From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: "linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org" <lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: include linux/backlight.h from asm/backlight.h
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 11:36:00 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87frx5plan.fsf@mail.lhotse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e5a0e44d-d2b9-49f0-9a08-fb7d9254266c@csgroup.eu>
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
> Le 04/03/2024 à 11:32, Thomas Zimmermann a écrit :
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 04.03.24 um 10:55 schrieb Jani Nikula:
>>> Removal of the backlight include from fb.h uncovered an implicit
>>> dependency in powerpc asm/backlight.h. Add the explicit include.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
>>> Closes:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/CA+G9fYsAk5TbqqxFC2W4oHLGA0CbTHMxbeq8QayFXTU75YiueA@mail.gmail.com
>>> Fixes: 11b4eedfc87d ("fbdev: Do not include <linux/backlight.h> in
>>> header")
>>> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
>>> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
>>> Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Not even compile tested!
>>
>> That's one of the cases that's hard to catch unless you get the config
>> right.
>>
>>> ---
>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>>> index 1b5eab62ed04..275d5bb9aa04 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>>> #define __ASM_POWERPC_BACKLIGHT_H
>>> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>>> +#include <linux/backlight.h>
>>
>> Thanks, but I think this should go directly into chipsfb.c. I would have
>> provided a patch already, if our mail server didn't have issues this
>> morning. Let me try again.
>
> asm/backlight.h needs it for struct backlight_device
>
> At least if you don't want to include linux/backlight.h in
> asm/backlight.h, then you need a forward declaration of struct
> backlight_device;
It's preferable for asm headers not to include linux headers (to avoid
loops), so a forward declaration would be better IMHO.
cheers
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: "linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org" <lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: include linux/backlight.h from asm/backlight.h
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 11:36:00 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87frx5plan.fsf@mail.lhotse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e5a0e44d-d2b9-49f0-9a08-fb7d9254266c@csgroup.eu>
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
> Le 04/03/2024 à 11:32, Thomas Zimmermann a écrit :
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 04.03.24 um 10:55 schrieb Jani Nikula:
>>> Removal of the backlight include from fb.h uncovered an implicit
>>> dependency in powerpc asm/backlight.h. Add the explicit include.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
>>> Closes:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/CA+G9fYsAk5TbqqxFC2W4oHLGA0CbTHMxbeq8QayFXTU75YiueA@mail.gmail.com
>>> Fixes: 11b4eedfc87d ("fbdev: Do not include <linux/backlight.h> in
>>> header")
>>> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
>>> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
>>> Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Not even compile tested!
>>
>> That's one of the cases that's hard to catch unless you get the config
>> right.
>>
>>> ---
>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>>> index 1b5eab62ed04..275d5bb9aa04 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>>> #define __ASM_POWERPC_BACKLIGHT_H
>>> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>>> +#include <linux/backlight.h>
>>
>> Thanks, but I think this should go directly into chipsfb.c. I would have
>> provided a patch already, if our mail server didn't have issues this
>> morning. Let me try again.
>
> asm/backlight.h needs it for struct backlight_device
>
> At least if you don't want to include linux/backlight.h in
> asm/backlight.h, then you need a forward declaration of struct
> backlight_device;
It's preferable for asm headers not to include linux headers (to avoid
loops), so a forward declaration would be better IMHO.
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-05 0:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-04 8:20 fbdev/chipsfb.c:401:31: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct backlight_device' Naresh Kamboju
2024-03-04 9:55 ` [PATCH] powerpc: include linux/backlight.h from asm/backlight.h Jani Nikula
2024-03-04 9:55 ` Jani Nikula
2024-03-04 10:01 ` Jani Nikula
2024-03-04 10:01 ` Jani Nikula
2024-03-04 14:55 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-03-04 14:55 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-03-05 0:39 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-03-05 0:39 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-03-05 8:19 ` Jani Nikula
2024-03-05 8:19 ` Jani Nikula
2024-03-04 10:32 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-03-04 10:32 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-03-04 10:40 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-03-04 10:40 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-03-04 18:13 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-03-04 18:13 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-03-05 0:36 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2024-03-05 0:36 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-03-05 8:09 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-03-05 8:09 ` Thomas Zimmermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87frx5plan.fsf@mail.lhotse \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.