All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/params: Align visibility of device level and global modparams
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 17:37:54 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fsy9blx9.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210526141946.2347085-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, 26 May 2021, Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>
> We have a few modparams which get conditionaly exposed based on a Kconfig
> options and in most cases this also means portions of the driver
> implementing the respective feature are also left out.
>
> Align the visibility of device level and global modparams to make them
> consistent in this respect.
>
> v2:
>  * Fix misplaced parentheses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

I'd happily accept patches removing some of the module params, and just
leaving the debugfs device params in place. ;)

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
> index 14cd64cc61d0..4a114a5ad000 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
> @@ -71,18 +71,18 @@ struct drm_printer;
>  	param(int, fastboot, -1, 0600) \
>  	param(int, enable_dpcd_backlight, -1, 0600) \
>  	param(char *, force_probe, CONFIG_DRM_I915_FORCE_PROBE, 0400) \
> -	param(unsigned long, fake_lmem_start, 0, 0400) \
> -	param(unsigned int, request_timeout_ms, CONFIG_DRM_I915_REQUEST_TIMEOUT, 0600) \
> +	param(unsigned long, fake_lmem_start, 0, IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_UNSTABLE_FAKE_LMEM) ? 0400 : 0) \
> +	param(unsigned int, request_timeout_ms, CONFIG_DRM_I915_REQUEST_TIMEOUT, CONFIG_DRM_I915_REQUEST_TIMEOUT ? 0600 : 0) \
>  	/* leave bools at the end to not create holes */ \
>  	param(bool, enable_hangcheck, true, 0600) \
>  	param(bool, load_detect_test, false, 0600) \
>  	param(bool, force_reset_modeset_test, false, 0600) \
> -	param(bool, error_capture, true, 0600) \
> +	param(bool, error_capture, true, IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_CAPTURE_ERROR) ? 0600 : 0) \
>  	param(bool, disable_display, false, 0400) \
>  	param(bool, verbose_state_checks, true, 0) \
>  	param(bool, nuclear_pageflip, false, 0400) \
>  	param(bool, enable_dp_mst, true, 0600) \
> -	param(bool, enable_gvt, false, 0400)
> +	param(bool, enable_gvt, false, IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_GVT) ? 0400 : 0)
>  
>  #define MEMBER(T, member, ...) T member;
>  struct i915_params {

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/params: Align visibility of device level and global modparams
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 17:37:54 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fsy9blx9.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210526141946.2347085-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, 26 May 2021, Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>
> We have a few modparams which get conditionaly exposed based on a Kconfig
> options and in most cases this also means portions of the driver
> implementing the respective feature are also left out.
>
> Align the visibility of device level and global modparams to make them
> consistent in this respect.
>
> v2:
>  * Fix misplaced parentheses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

I'd happily accept patches removing some of the module params, and just
leaving the debugfs device params in place. ;)

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
> index 14cd64cc61d0..4a114a5ad000 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
> @@ -71,18 +71,18 @@ struct drm_printer;
>  	param(int, fastboot, -1, 0600) \
>  	param(int, enable_dpcd_backlight, -1, 0600) \
>  	param(char *, force_probe, CONFIG_DRM_I915_FORCE_PROBE, 0400) \
> -	param(unsigned long, fake_lmem_start, 0, 0400) \
> -	param(unsigned int, request_timeout_ms, CONFIG_DRM_I915_REQUEST_TIMEOUT, 0600) \
> +	param(unsigned long, fake_lmem_start, 0, IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_UNSTABLE_FAKE_LMEM) ? 0400 : 0) \
> +	param(unsigned int, request_timeout_ms, CONFIG_DRM_I915_REQUEST_TIMEOUT, CONFIG_DRM_I915_REQUEST_TIMEOUT ? 0600 : 0) \
>  	/* leave bools at the end to not create holes */ \
>  	param(bool, enable_hangcheck, true, 0600) \
>  	param(bool, load_detect_test, false, 0600) \
>  	param(bool, force_reset_modeset_test, false, 0600) \
> -	param(bool, error_capture, true, 0600) \
> +	param(bool, error_capture, true, IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_CAPTURE_ERROR) ? 0600 : 0) \
>  	param(bool, disable_display, false, 0400) \
>  	param(bool, verbose_state_checks, true, 0) \
>  	param(bool, nuclear_pageflip, false, 0400) \
>  	param(bool, enable_dp_mst, true, 0600) \
> -	param(bool, enable_gvt, false, 0400)
> +	param(bool, enable_gvt, false, IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_GVT) ? 0400 : 0)
>  
>  #define MEMBER(T, member, ...) T member;
>  struct i915_params {

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-26 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-26 10:00 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/params: Align visibility of device level and global modparams Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 10:00 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for " Patchwork
2021-05-26 14:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Ville Syrjälä
2021-05-26 14:11   ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-05-26 14:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 14:19   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 14:37   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2021-05-26 14:37     ` Jani Nikula
2021-05-26 18:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/params: Align visibility of device level and global modparams (rev2) Patchwork
2021-05-26 19:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-05-27  6:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fsy9blx9.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.