All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: "ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY" <kishon@ti.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
	tony@atomide.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, balbi@ti.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] omap: add ocp2scp as a misc driver
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:07:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fwa01mso.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAe_U6+zi50muNFKXW9ytK0BVki+5wxVK_S0rjEc53M2oc-GeQ@mail.gmail.com> (KISHON VIJAY ABRAHAM's message of "Wed, 6 Jun 2012 20:40:50 +0530")

"ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY" <kishon@ti.com> writes:

> Hi Kevin, Benoit, Paul,
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>> On Thursday 31 May 2012, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
>>> > I would mark the multiplexed device compatible with "simple-bus", which
>>> > results in the child devices automatically getting added.
>>>
>>> hmm.. ocp2scp has a sysconfig register and it also has a module mode
>>> by which it can be enabled/disabled. I was making use of pm_runtime
>>> API's to control these registers (Apart from creating child devices,
>>> the driver also has a call to pm_runtime_enable).
>>
>> I see.
>>
>>> I'm not sure if with
>>> "simple-bus" we'll be able to do those. I have to check on that.
>>
>> How about making it compatible with both "simple-bus" and something
>> that handles the pm_runtime requirements?
>>
>> I don't understand enough of what needs to be done for pm_runtime
>> across a lot of devices, but I'd hope that it should be possible
>> to do that in a generic way based on the device definition.
>
> Is there already exists a generic way for handling pm_runtime
> requirements (as simple as doing a pm_runtime_enable on a device).

As you've discovered, the runtime PM core handles the parent/child
relationships already.

> So the actual problem is we have ocp2scp as parent and usb2phy and
> usb3phy as the child device. ocp2scp has the sysconfig register and it
> can be controlled using module mode bit (both of this can be
> controlled by pm_runtime). Whenever usb controller(dwc3/musb) wants to
> enable a phy, it calls an exported API in usb2/usb3 phy to enable it.
> These API's have pm_runtime_get_sync on usb2/usb3 device which in-turn
> calls pm_runtime_get_sync of ocp2scp because of parent->child
> relationship (For this both usb2/usb3 phy and ocp2scp devices should
> have called pm_runtime_enable). All I'm trying is to find a place to
> have pm_runtime_enable for ocp2scp.

Maybe I'm not following, but why can't it be in the driver?

Kevin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/5] omap: add ocp2scp as a misc driver
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:07:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fwa01mso.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAe_U6+zi50muNFKXW9ytK0BVki+5wxVK_S0rjEc53M2oc-GeQ@mail.gmail.com> (KISHON VIJAY ABRAHAM's message of "Wed, 6 Jun 2012 20:40:50 +0530")

"ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY" <kishon@ti.com> writes:

> Hi Kevin, Benoit, Paul,
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>> On Thursday 31 May 2012, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
>>> > I would mark the multiplexed device compatible with "simple-bus", which
>>> > results in the child devices automatically getting added.
>>>
>>> hmm.. ocp2scp has a sysconfig register and it also has a module mode
>>> by which it can be enabled/disabled. I was making use of pm_runtime
>>> API's to control these registers (Apart from creating child devices,
>>> the driver also has a call to pm_runtime_enable).
>>
>> I see.
>>
>>> I'm not sure if with
>>> "simple-bus" we'll be able to do those. I have to check on that.
>>
>> How about making it compatible with both "simple-bus" and something
>> that handles the pm_runtime requirements?
>>
>> I don't understand enough of what needs to be done for pm_runtime
>> across a lot of devices, but I'd hope that it should be possible
>> to do that in a generic way based on the device definition.
>
> Is there already exists a generic way for handling pm_runtime
> requirements (as simple as doing a pm_runtime_enable on a device).

As you've discovered, the runtime PM core handles the parent/child
relationships already.

> So the actual problem is we have ocp2scp as parent and usb2phy and
> usb3phy as the child device. ocp2scp has the sysconfig register and it
> can be controlled using module mode bit (both of this can be
> controlled by pm_runtime). Whenever usb controller(dwc3/musb) wants to
> enable a phy, it calls an exported API in usb2/usb3 phy to enable it.
> These API's have pm_runtime_get_sync on usb2/usb3 device which in-turn
> calls pm_runtime_get_sync of ocp2scp because of parent->child
> relationship (For this both usb2/usb3 phy and ocp2scp devices should
> have called pm_runtime_enable). All I'm trying is to find a place to
> have pm_runtime_enable for ocp2scp.

Maybe I'm not following, but why can't it be in the driver?

Kevin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: "ABRAHAM\, KISHON VIJAY" <kishon@ti.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, "Cousson\,
	Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
	tony@atomide.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, balbi@ti.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] omap: add ocp2scp as a misc driver
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:07:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fwa01mso.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAe_U6+zi50muNFKXW9ytK0BVki+5wxVK_S0rjEc53M2oc-GeQ@mail.gmail.com> (KISHON VIJAY ABRAHAM's message of "Wed, 6 Jun 2012 20:40:50 +0530")

"ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY" <kishon@ti.com> writes:

> Hi Kevin, Benoit, Paul,
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>> On Thursday 31 May 2012, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
>>> > I would mark the multiplexed device compatible with "simple-bus", which
>>> > results in the child devices automatically getting added.
>>>
>>> hmm.. ocp2scp has a sysconfig register and it also has a module mode
>>> by which it can be enabled/disabled. I was making use of pm_runtime
>>> API's to control these registers (Apart from creating child devices,
>>> the driver also has a call to pm_runtime_enable).
>>
>> I see.
>>
>>> I'm not sure if with
>>> "simple-bus" we'll be able to do those. I have to check on that.
>>
>> How about making it compatible with both "simple-bus" and something
>> that handles the pm_runtime requirements?
>>
>> I don't understand enough of what needs to be done for pm_runtime
>> across a lot of devices, but I'd hope that it should be possible
>> to do that in a generic way based on the device definition.
>
> Is there already exists a generic way for handling pm_runtime
> requirements (as simple as doing a pm_runtime_enable on a device).

As you've discovered, the runtime PM core handles the parent/child
relationships already.

> So the actual problem is we have ocp2scp as parent and usb2phy and
> usb3phy as the child device. ocp2scp has the sysconfig register and it
> can be controlled using module mode bit (both of this can be
> controlled by pm_runtime). Whenever usb controller(dwc3/musb) wants to
> enable a phy, it calls an exported API in usb2/usb3 phy to enable it.
> These API's have pm_runtime_get_sync on usb2/usb3 device which in-turn
> calls pm_runtime_get_sync of ocp2scp because of parent->child
> relationship (For this both usb2/usb3 phy and ocp2scp devices should
> have called pm_runtime_enable). All I'm trying is to find a place to
> have pm_runtime_enable for ocp2scp.

Maybe I'm not following, but why can't it be in the driver?

Kevin


  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-12 17:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-30 10:56 [RFC PATCH 0/5] omap: add ocp2scp as a misc driver Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2012-05-30 10:56 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2012-05-30 10:56 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2012-05-30 10:56 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] arm: omap: hwmod: make *phy_48m* as the main_clk of ocp2scp Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2012-05-30 10:56   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2012-05-30 10:56   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2012-05-30 14:48   ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-05-30 14:48     ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-05-30 14:48     ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-05-30 10:56 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] arm: omap: remove ocp2scp_usb_phy_ick clock node Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2012-05-30 10:56   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2012-05-30 10:56   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2012-05-30 14:51   ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-05-30 14:51     ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-05-30 14:51     ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-05-30 15:23     ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-05-30 15:23       ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-05-30 15:23       ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-06-01 12:52       ` ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY
2012-06-01 12:52         ` ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY
2012-06-01 12:52         ` ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY
2012-06-01 13:24         ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-06-01 13:24           ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-06-01 13:24           ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-06-01 15:54           ` ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY
2012-06-01 15:54             ` ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY
2012-06-01 15:54             ` ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY
2012-09-06 15:02   ` ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY
2012-09-06 15:02     ` ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY
2012-05-30 10:56 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] drivers: misc: omap: add a new driver for ocp2scp Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2012-05-30 10:56   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2012-05-30 10:56   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2012-05-30 14:55   ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-05-30 14:55     ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-05-30 10:56 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] ARM: OMAP4: add _dev_attr_ to ocp2scp for representing usb_phy Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2012-05-30 10:56   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2012-05-30 10:56   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2012-05-30 10:56 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] arm: omap: ocp2scp: create omap device for ocp2scp Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2012-05-30 10:56   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2012-05-30 10:56   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2012-05-30 18:43 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] omap: add ocp2scp as a misc driver Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-30 18:43   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-31  8:14   ` ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY
2012-05-31  8:14     ` ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY
2012-05-31  9:22     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-31  9:22       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-31 11:18       ` ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY
2012-05-31 11:18         ` ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY
2012-05-31 11:18         ` ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY
2012-05-31 20:46         ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-31 20:46           ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-06-06 15:10           ` ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY
2012-06-06 15:10             ` ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY
2012-06-12 17:07             ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-06-12 17:07               ` Kevin Hilman
2012-06-12 17:07               ` Kevin Hilman
2012-06-18  9:34               ` ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY
2012-06-18  9:34                 ` ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY
2012-06-01 10:58       ` Tony Lindgren
2012-06-01 10:58         ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fwa01mso.fsf@ti.com \
    --to=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.