From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Vishwanath Sripathy <vishwanath.bs@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain support via hwmod mux
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:48:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k46izb8b.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a480ee86d60a9db484d3baa0faf2477f@mail.gmail.com> (Vishwanath Sripathy's message of "Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:29:38 +0530")
Vishwanath Sripathy <vishwanath.bs@ti.com> writes:
> Hi Kevin,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Vishwanath Sripathy [mailto:vishwanath.bs@ti.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 4:53 PM
>> To: Kevin Hilman
>> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> Subject: RE: [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain
>> support via hwmod mux
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khilman@ti.com]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 6:28 AM
>> > To: Vishwanath BS
>> > Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
>> kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> > Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain
>> > support via hwmod mux
>> >
>> > Hi Vishwa,
>> >
>> > Vishwanath BS <vishwanath.bs@ti.com> writes:
>> >
>> > > The folowing patch series provides IO Daisychain feature via
>> omap
>> > hwmod mux
>> > > framework.
>> >
>> > The series looks OK at first glance, but needs a refresh against
>> > current
>> > mainline.
>> OK.
>> >
>> > Can you refresh this against Tony's 'fixes' branch and re-test.
>> >
>> > I tested this on OMAP3430/n900 and noticed that it no longer hit
>> off
>> > mode from idle.
>> >
>> > IOW, If I enable UART timeouts and then enable off mode, I don't
>> > actually ever hit off during idle. However, if I do a
>> > suspend/resume I
>> > see it hits off mode, then subsequent attempts to hit off during
>> > idle work.
>> >
>> > Can you investigate this?
>> OK. Let me check that.
> I rebased these patches against latest Tony's fixes branch and tested it
> on OMAP3430 SDP. I see that Core enters off mode in idle path after
> setting UART timeout w/o having to suspend the system.
OK, sounds good.
Do you have a branch that I can test as well?
Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain support via hwmod mux
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:48:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k46izb8b.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a480ee86d60a9db484d3baa0faf2477f@mail.gmail.com> (Vishwanath Sripathy's message of "Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:29:38 +0530")
Vishwanath Sripathy <vishwanath.bs@ti.com> writes:
> Hi Kevin,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Vishwanath Sripathy [mailto:vishwanath.bs at ti.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 4:53 PM
>> To: Kevin Hilman
>> Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> Subject: RE: [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain
>> support via hwmod mux
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khilman at ti.com]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 6:28 AM
>> > To: Vishwanath BS
>> > Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
>> kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> > Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain
>> > support via hwmod mux
>> >
>> > Hi Vishwa,
>> >
>> > Vishwanath BS <vishwanath.bs@ti.com> writes:
>> >
>> > > The folowing patch series provides IO Daisychain feature via
>> omap
>> > hwmod mux
>> > > framework.
>> >
>> > The series looks OK at first glance, but needs a refresh against
>> > current
>> > mainline.
>> OK.
>> >
>> > Can you refresh this against Tony's 'fixes' branch and re-test.
>> >
>> > I tested this on OMAP3430/n900 and noticed that it no longer hit
>> off
>> > mode from idle.
>> >
>> > IOW, If I enable UART timeouts and then enable off mode, I don't
>> > actually ever hit off during idle. However, if I do a
>> > suspend/resume I
>> > see it hits off mode, then subsequent attempts to hit off during
>> > idle work.
>> >
>> > Can you investigate this?
>> OK. Let me check that.
> I rebased these patches against latest Tony's fixes branch and tested it
> on OMAP3430 SDP. I see that Core enters off mode in idle path after
> setting UART timeout w/o having to suspend the system.
OK, sounds good.
Do you have a branch that I can test as well?
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-30 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-07 17:47 [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain support via hwmod mux Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` [PATCHv2 1/7] ARM: OMAP3 PM: correct enable/disable of daisy io chain Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` [PATCHv2 2/7] ARM: OMAP3 PM: Move IO Daisychain function to omap3 prm file Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` [PATCHv2 3/7] ARM: OMAP4 PM: Add IO Daisychain support Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` [PATCHv2 4/7] ARM: OMAP3 PM: Enable IO Wake up Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` [PATCHv2 5/7] ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO Daisychain support via hwmod mux Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` [PATCHv2 6/7] ARM: OMAP3 PM: Remove IO Daisychain control from cpuidle Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` [PATCHv2 7/7] ARM: OMAP3 PM: Enable IO Daisychain for supported chips Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` Vishwanath BS
2011-11-08 0:58 ` [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain support via hwmod mux Kevin Hilman
2011-11-08 0:58 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-11-29 11:22 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-11-29 11:22 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-11-29 14:59 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-11-29 14:59 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-11-30 0:48 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-11-30 0:48 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-11-30 9:27 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-11-30 9:27 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-12-02 16:58 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-12-02 16:58 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-12-13 14:23 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-12-13 14:23 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-12-13 19:31 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-12-13 19:31 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k46izb8b.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishwanath.bs@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.