From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Vishwanath Sripathy <vishwanath.bs@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain support via hwmod mux
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:31:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wra0uv3k.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f34d798db0dcb69747e6fc722cb0cf7@mail.gmail.com> (Vishwanath Sripathy's message of "Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:53:29 +0530")
Vishwanath Sripathy <vishwanath.bs@ti.com> writes:
> Kevin,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Vishwanath Sripathy [mailto:vishwanath.bs@ti.com]
>> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 10:29 PM
>> To: Kevin Hilman
>> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> Subject: RE: [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain
>> support via hwmod mux
>>
>> Kevin,
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Vishwanath Sripathy [mailto:vishwanath.bs@ti.com]
>> > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 2:58 PM
>> > To: Kevin Hilman
>> > Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
>> kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> > Subject: RE: [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain
>> > support via hwmod mux
>> >
>> > ---
>> > > >> > Can you refresh this against Tony's 'fixes' branch and re-
>> > test.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > I tested this on OMAP3430/n900 and noticed that it no
>> longer
>> > > hit
>> > > >> off
>> > > >> > mode from idle.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > IOW, If I enable UART timeouts and then enable off mode, I
>> > > don't
>> > > >> > actually ever hit off during idle. However, if I do a
>> > > >> > suspend/resume I
>> > > >> > see it hits off mode, then subsequent attempts to hit off
>> > > during
>> > > >> > idle work.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Can you investigate this?
>> > > >> OK. Let me check that.
>> > > > I rebased these patches against latest Tony's fixes branch and
>> > > tested it
>> > > > on OMAP3430 SDP. I see that Core enters off mode in idle path
>> > > after
>> > > > setting UART timeout w/o having to suspend the system.
>> > >
>> > > OK, sounds good.
>> > >
>> > > Do you have a branch that I can test as well?
>> > Sure. It's available at
>> > git://gitorious.org/omap-pm/linux.git for_3.3/io_daisy_chain
>> Did you get any chance to test it at your side?
>> Should I post the rebased patches?
> I have rebased these patch series against LO master commit id:
> deee6d5359969a0ce4e2760cfd7b9f379bd5698a and same is available here [1].
>
> I have tested these patch series along with Tero's Chain Handler +
> Govind's UART Runtime series which is available at [2].
Thanks.
Can you repost the latest version, with tested-bys as appropriate and
describing how it was tested and on what platforms.
This series has several dependencies/conflicts with Tero's series, so it
would be helpful that the posted version is based on Tero's stuff.
Since Tero's stuff is going through Paul, your series will as well (if
Paul is OK with it.)
Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain support via hwmod mux
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:31:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wra0uv3k.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f34d798db0dcb69747e6fc722cb0cf7@mail.gmail.com> (Vishwanath Sripathy's message of "Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:53:29 +0530")
Vishwanath Sripathy <vishwanath.bs@ti.com> writes:
> Kevin,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Vishwanath Sripathy [mailto:vishwanath.bs at ti.com]
>> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 10:29 PM
>> To: Kevin Hilman
>> Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> Subject: RE: [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain
>> support via hwmod mux
>>
>> Kevin,
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Vishwanath Sripathy [mailto:vishwanath.bs at ti.com]
>> > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 2:58 PM
>> > To: Kevin Hilman
>> > Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
>> kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> > Subject: RE: [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain
>> > support via hwmod mux
>> >
>> > ---
>> > > >> > Can you refresh this against Tony's 'fixes' branch and re-
>> > test.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > I tested this on OMAP3430/n900 and noticed that it no
>> longer
>> > > hit
>> > > >> off
>> > > >> > mode from idle.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > IOW, If I enable UART timeouts and then enable off mode, I
>> > > don't
>> > > >> > actually ever hit off during idle. However, if I do a
>> > > >> > suspend/resume I
>> > > >> > see it hits off mode, then subsequent attempts to hit off
>> > > during
>> > > >> > idle work.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Can you investigate this?
>> > > >> OK. Let me check that.
>> > > > I rebased these patches against latest Tony's fixes branch and
>> > > tested it
>> > > > on OMAP3430 SDP. I see that Core enters off mode in idle path
>> > > after
>> > > > setting UART timeout w/o having to suspend the system.
>> > >
>> > > OK, sounds good.
>> > >
>> > > Do you have a branch that I can test as well?
>> > Sure. It's available at
>> > git://gitorious.org/omap-pm/linux.git for_3.3/io_daisy_chain
>> Did you get any chance to test it at your side?
>> Should I post the rebased patches?
> I have rebased these patch series against LO master commit id:
> deee6d5359969a0ce4e2760cfd7b9f379bd5698a and same is available here [1].
>
> I have tested these patch series along with Tero's Chain Handler +
> Govind's UART Runtime series which is available at [2].
Thanks.
Can you repost the latest version, with tested-bys as appropriate and
describing how it was tested and on what platforms.
This series has several dependencies/conflicts with Tero's series, so it
would be helpful that the posted version is based on Tero's stuff.
Since Tero's stuff is going through Paul, your series will as well (if
Paul is OK with it.)
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-13 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-07 17:47 [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain support via hwmod mux Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` [PATCHv2 1/7] ARM: OMAP3 PM: correct enable/disable of daisy io chain Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` [PATCHv2 2/7] ARM: OMAP3 PM: Move IO Daisychain function to omap3 prm file Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` [PATCHv2 3/7] ARM: OMAP4 PM: Add IO Daisychain support Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` [PATCHv2 4/7] ARM: OMAP3 PM: Enable IO Wake up Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` [PATCHv2 5/7] ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO Daisychain support via hwmod mux Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` [PATCHv2 6/7] ARM: OMAP3 PM: Remove IO Daisychain control from cpuidle Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` [PATCHv2 7/7] ARM: OMAP3 PM: Enable IO Daisychain for supported chips Vishwanath BS
2011-10-07 17:47 ` Vishwanath BS
2011-11-08 0:58 ` [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain support via hwmod mux Kevin Hilman
2011-11-08 0:58 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-11-29 11:22 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-11-29 11:22 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-11-29 14:59 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-11-29 14:59 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-11-30 0:48 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-11-30 0:48 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-11-30 9:27 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-11-30 9:27 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-12-02 16:58 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-12-02 16:58 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-12-13 14:23 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-12-13 14:23 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-12-13 19:31 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-12-13 19:31 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wra0uv3k.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishwanath.bs@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.