From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/24] KVM: arm64: Introduce shadow VM state at EL2
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 10:41:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lespzbfc.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YtWpBYPrBcdyp9r6@google.com>
On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 19:40:05 +0100,
Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> In the end, we don't seem to use much from the struct kvm_cpu. Is it for
> convinience that a smaller struct kvm_shadow_cpu hasn't been created, or we do
> anticipate a later wider usage?
The alternative would be to repaint the whole of the core KVM/arm64
code to be able to take the new structure in parallel with the
standard one. There is very little to gain from such a move.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
kernel-team@android.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/24] KVM: arm64: Introduce shadow VM state at EL2
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 10:41:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lespzbfc.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YtWpBYPrBcdyp9r6@google.com>
On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 19:40:05 +0100,
Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> In the end, we don't seem to use much from the struct kvm_cpu. Is it for
> convinience that a smaller struct kvm_shadow_cpu hasn't been created, or we do
> anticipate a later wider usage?
The alternative would be to repaint the whole of the core KVM/arm64
code to be able to take the new structure in parallel with the
standard one. There is very little to gain from such a move.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
kernel-team@android.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/24] KVM: arm64: Introduce shadow VM state at EL2
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 10:41:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lespzbfc.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YtWpBYPrBcdyp9r6@google.com>
On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 19:40:05 +0100,
Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> In the end, we don't seem to use much from the struct kvm_cpu. Is it for
> convinience that a smaller struct kvm_shadow_cpu hasn't been created, or we do
> anticipate a later wider usage?
The alternative would be to repaint the whole of the core KVM/arm64
code to be able to take the new structure in parallel with the
standard one. There is very little to gain from such a move.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-19 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 135+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-30 13:57 [PATCH v2 00/24] KVM: arm64: Introduce pKVM shadow state at EL2 Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 01/24] KVM: arm64: Move hyp refcount manipulation helpers Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 02/24] KVM: arm64: Allow non-coalescable pages in a hyp_pool Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 03/24] KVM: arm64: Add flags to struct hyp_page Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-18 10:54 ` Vincent Donnefort
2022-07-18 10:54 ` Vincent Donnefort
2022-07-18 10:54 ` Vincent Donnefort
2022-07-18 10:57 ` Vincent Donnefort
2022-07-18 10:57 ` Vincent Donnefort
2022-07-18 10:57 ` Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-30 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 04/24] KVM: arm64: Back hyp_vmemmap for all of memory Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 05/24] KVM: arm64: Make hyp stage-1 refcnt correct on the whole range Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 06/24] KVM: arm64: Unify identifiers used to distinguish host and hypervisor Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-20 15:11 ` Oliver Upton
2022-07-20 15:11 ` Oliver Upton
2022-07-20 15:11 ` Oliver Upton
2022-07-20 18:14 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-20 18:14 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-20 18:14 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-29 19:28 ` Oliver Upton
2022-07-29 19:28 ` Oliver Upton
2022-07-29 19:28 ` Oliver Upton
2022-06-30 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 07/24] KVM: arm64: Implement do_donate() helper for donating memory Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/24] KVM: arm64: Prevent the donation of no-map pages Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 09/24] KVM: arm64: Add helpers to pin memory shared with hyp Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 10/24] KVM: arm64: Include asm/kvm_mmu.h in nvhe/mem_protect.h Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 11/24] KVM: arm64: Add hyp_spinlock_t static initializer Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/24] KVM: arm64: Introduce shadow VM state at EL2 Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-18 18:40 ` Vincent Donnefort
2022-07-18 18:40 ` Vincent Donnefort
2022-07-18 18:40 ` Vincent Donnefort
2022-07-19 9:41 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2022-07-19 9:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-19 9:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-20 18:20 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-20 18:20 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-20 18:20 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 13/24] KVM: arm64: Instantiate VM shadow data from EL1 Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 14/24] KVM: arm64: Add pcpu fixmap infrastructure at EL2 Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-19 13:30 ` Vincent Donnefort
2022-07-19 13:30 ` Vincent Donnefort
2022-07-19 13:30 ` Vincent Donnefort
2022-07-19 14:09 ` Quentin Perret
2022-07-19 14:09 ` Quentin Perret
2022-07-19 14:09 ` Quentin Perret
2022-07-19 14:10 ` Quentin Perret
2022-07-19 14:10 ` Quentin Perret
2022-07-19 14:10 ` Quentin Perret
2022-06-30 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 15/24] KVM: arm64: Initialise hyp symbols regardless of pKVM Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 16/24] KVM: arm64: Provide I-cache invalidation by VA at EL2 Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 17/24] KVM: arm64: Add generic hyp_memcache helpers Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 18/24] KVM: arm64: Instantiate guest stage-2 page-tables at EL2 Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-19 13:32 ` Vincent Donnefort
2022-07-19 13:32 ` Vincent Donnefort
2022-07-19 13:32 ` Vincent Donnefort
2022-07-20 18:26 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-20 18:26 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-20 18:26 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 19/24] KVM: arm64: Return guest memory from EL2 via dedicated teardown memcache Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 20/24] KVM: arm64: Unmap kvm_arm_hyp_percpu_base from the host Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 21/24] KVM: arm64: Maintain a copy of 'kvm_arm_vmid_bits' at EL2 Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 22/24] KVM: arm64: Explicitly map kvm_vgic_global_state " Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 23/24] KVM: arm64: Don't map host sections in pkvm Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/24] KVM: arm64: Use the shadow vCPU structure in handle___kvm_vcpu_run() Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-06-30 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-06 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 00/24] KVM: arm64: Introduce pKVM shadow state at EL2 Sean Christopherson
2022-07-06 19:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-06 19:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-08 16:23 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-08 16:23 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-08 16:23 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-19 16:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-19 16:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-19 16:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-20 9:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-20 9:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-20 9:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-20 18:48 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-20 18:48 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-20 18:48 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-20 21:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-20 21:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-20 21:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-19 14:24 ` Vincent Donnefort
2022-07-19 14:24 ` Vincent Donnefort
2022-07-19 14:24 ` Vincent Donnefort
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lespzbfc.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.