Are we ready for jewel 10.2.6?

Are we ready for jewel 10.2.6?

[Nathan Cutler]

Hi Abhishek:

The stable releases and backports team has been working to prepare the 
Jewel 10.2.6 release and so far we have merged a large number of 
bugfixes and even some features that were judged to be worth backporting.

I don't have a full list, yet, because I'm still merging RGW backports 
and there a few more miscellaneous backports still in the queue. The 
integration tests are looking better and better, and I expect these will 
be merged within the next week or two.

Do you think it's time to publish a 10.2.6 point release?

Nathan

Re: Are we ready for jewel 10.2.6?

[Abhishek L]

Nathan Cutler writes:

> Hi Abhishek:
>
> The stable releases and backports team has been working to prepare the
> Jewel 10.2.6 release and so far we have merged a large number of
> bugfixes and even some features that were judged to be worth backporting.
>
> I don't have a full list, yet, because I'm still merging RGW backports
> and there a few more miscellaneous backports still in the queue. The
> integration tests are looking better and better, and I expect these will
> be merged within the next week or two.
>
> Do you think it's time to publish a 10.2.6 point release?

Yes, lets start getting the leads approval and handover to QE
--
Abhishek Lekshmanan
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

Re: Are we ready for jewel 10.2.6?

[Wido den Hollander]

> Op 1 februari 2017 om 16:35 schreef Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.cz>:
> 
> 
> Hi Abhishek:
> 
> The stable releases and backports team has been working to prepare the 
> Jewel 10.2.6 release and so far we have merged a large number of 
> bugfixes and even some features that were judged to be worth backporting.
> 
> I don't have a full list, yet, because I'm still merging RGW backports 
> and there a few more miscellaneous backports still in the queue. The 
> integration tests are looking better and better, and I expect these will 
> be merged within the next week or two.
> 
> Do you think it's time to publish a 10.2.6 point release?

I would ask to wait a bit. Some long outstanding issues with RGW are data leaks and the orphan scan not working.

These issues:

- http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18331
- http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18258

As 10.2.7 might take a long time I would ask to wait for Yehuda. He says to be close. I and many other users would like to see this fixed sooner then later.

Wido

> 
> Nathan
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Are we ready for jewel 10.2.6?

[Wyllys Ingersoll]

Any chance this one gets fixed in 10.2.6?

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14115

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Wido den Hollander <wido@42on.com> wrote:
>
>> Op 1 februari 2017 om 16:35 schreef Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.cz>:
>>
>>
>> Hi Abhishek:
>>
>> The stable releases and backports team has been working to prepare the
>> Jewel 10.2.6 release and so far we have merged a large number of
>> bugfixes and even some features that were judged to be worth backporting.
>>
>> I don't have a full list, yet, because I'm still merging RGW backports
>> and there a few more miscellaneous backports still in the queue. The
>> integration tests are looking better and better, and I expect these will
>> be merged within the next week or two.
>>
>> Do you think it's time to publish a 10.2.6 point release?
>
> I would ask to wait a bit. Some long outstanding issues with RGW are data leaks and the orphan scan not working.
>
> These issues:
>
> - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18331
> - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18258
>
> As 10.2.7 might take a long time I would ask to wait for Yehuda. He says to be close. I and many other users would like to see this fixed sooner then later.
>
> Wido
>
>>
>> Nathan
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Are we ready for jewel 10.2.6?

[Piotr Dałek]

On 02/01/2017 04:35 PM, Nathan Cutler wrote:
> Hi Abhishek:
>
> The stable releases and backports team has been working to prepare the Jewel
> 10.2.6 release and so far we have merged a large number of bugfixes and even
> some features that were judged to be worth backporting.
>
> I don't have a full list, yet, because I'm still merging RGW backports and
> there a few more miscellaneous backports still in the queue. The integration
> tests are looking better and better, and I expect these will be merged
> within the next week or two.
>
> Do you think it's time to publish a 10.2.6 point release?

Any chance to have
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13131
and
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13214
included in 10.2.6?

-- 
Piotr Dałek
piotr.dalek@corp.ovh.com
https://www.ovh.com/us/

Re: Are we ready for jewel 10.2.6?

[Loic Dachary]

Hi,

On 02/02/2017 08:06 AM, Piotr Dałek wrote:
> On 02/01/2017 04:35 PM, Nathan Cutler wrote:
>> Hi Abhishek:
>>
>> The stable releases and backports team has been working to prepare the Jewel
>> 10.2.6 release and so far we have merged a large number of bugfixes and even
>> some features that were judged to be worth backporting.
>>
>> I don't have a full list, yet, because I'm still merging RGW backports and
>> there a few more miscellaneous backports still in the queue. The integration
>> tests are looking better and better, and I expect these will be merged
>> within the next week or two.
>>
>> Do you think it's time to publish a 10.2.6 point release?
> 
> Any chance to have
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13131

I'll let Nathan comment on this one.

> and
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13214

Since it is a backport of https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13213 which is not yet merged in master, it is unlikely to make it to 10.2.6. Not impossible but things would have to move unusually fast for that to happen ;-)

> included in 10.2.6?

Cheers

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Re: Are we ready for jewel 10.2.6?

[Piotr Dałek]

On 02/02/2017 09:22 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>>[..]
>>> Do you think it's time to publish a 10.2.6 point release?
>>
>> Any chance to have
>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13131
>
> I'll let Nathan comment on this one.
>
>> and
>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13214
>
> Since it is a backport of https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13213 which is not yet merged in master, it is unlikely to make it to 10.2.6. Not impossible but things would have to move unusually fast for that to happen ;-)

The last one is of particular use (for us at least) - it could help reducing 
the time the cluster needs to recover while still serving I/O to clients -- 
of which we have a whole lot. In the past it was the throttler which was 
limiting us, and not the cluster itself, we could change the throttler 
values but that required an OSD restart... which was unacceptable because 
that would induce even more recovery.

-- 
Piotr Dałek
piotr.dalek@corp.ovh.com
https://www.ovh.com/us/

Re: Are we ready for jewel 10.2.6?

[Nathan Cutler]

> Any chance this one gets fixed in 10.2.6?
>
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14115

That's https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/12624 which has not been merged 
to master. It can't be backported until it's merged.

Nathan

Re: Are we ready for jewel 10.2.6?

[Nathan Cutler]

>> Any chance to have
>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13131
>
> I'll let Nathan comment on this one.

That one is properly staged and is just waiting for me to fix 
upgrade/hammer-x and run it. So, barring unforeseen circumstances it 
should make it.

Nathan

Re: Are we ready for jewel 10.2.6?

[Bartłomiej Święcki]

Hi,

Any chance to get this in: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13232 ?

Guess it was skipped, I incorrectly marked the issue for backport.

Bartek


On 02/01/2017 04:35 PM, Nathan Cutler wrote:
> Hi Abhishek:
>
> The stable releases and backports team has been working to prepare the 
> Jewel 10.2.6 release and so far we have merged a large number of 
> bugfixes and even some features that were judged to be worth backporting.
>
> I don't have a full list, yet, because I'm still merging RGW backports 
> and there a few more miscellaneous backports still in the queue. The 
> integration tests are looking better and better, and I expect these 
> will be merged within the next week or two.
>
> Do you think it's time to publish a 10.2.6 point release?
>
> Nathan
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Are we ready for jewel 10.2.6?

[Alexey Sheplyakov]

Hi,

> I'm still merging RGW backports and there a few more miscellaneous backports still in the queue.

Any chance to have https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13004 included in 10.2.6?

Best regards,
      Alexey

Re: Are we ready for jewel 10.2.6?

[Loic Dachary]

Hi Alexey,

On 02/03/2017 07:11 AM, Alexey Sheplyakov wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> I'm still merging RGW backports and there a few more miscellaneous backports still in the queue.
> 
> Any chance to have https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13004 included in 10.2.6?

Thanks for rebasing it :-) It now needs to go through a round of testing, which may or may not happen. Note however that you can run the relevant rgw teuthology jobs to test this pull request and if they succeed it will be merged.

Cheers

> 
> Best regards,
>       Alexey
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Re: Are we ready for jewel 10.2.6?

[Brad Hubbard]

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11410 maybe?

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
> Hi Alexey,
>
> On 02/03/2017 07:11 AM, Alexey Sheplyakov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> I'm still merging RGW backports and there a few more miscellaneous backports still in the queue.
>>
>> Any chance to have https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13004 included in 10.2.6?
>
> Thanks for rebasing it :-) It now needs to go through a round of testing, which may or may not happen. Note however that you can run the relevant rgw teuthology jobs to test this pull request and if they succeed it will be merged.
>
> Cheers
>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>       Alexey
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Cheers,
Brad

Re: Are we ready for jewel 10.2.6?

[Dan van der Ster]

Hi guys,

How close is 10.2.6? It would be really nice if this one-liner could
be included: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18708

Cheers, Dan


On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Brad Hubbard <bhubbard@redhat.com> wrote:
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11410 maybe?
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
>> Hi Alexey,
>>
>> On 02/03/2017 07:11 AM, Alexey Sheplyakov wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> I'm still merging RGW backports and there a few more miscellaneous backports still in the queue.
>>>
>>> Any chance to have https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13004 included in 10.2.6?
>>
>> Thanks for rebasing it :-) It now needs to go through a round of testing, which may or may not happen. Note however that you can run the relevant rgw teuthology jobs to test this pull request and if they succeed it will be merged.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>       Alexey
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Brad
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Are we ready for jewel 10.2.6?

[Wido den Hollander]

> Op 16 februari 2017 om 11:55 schreef Dan van der Ster <dan@vanderster.com>:
> 
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
> How close is 10.2.6? It would be really nice if this one-liner could
> be included: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18708
> 

I checked, but there is/was no PR against the Jewel branch, only the one against master: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/12973

So I doubt it will make it in.

Wido


> Cheers, Dan
> 
> 
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Brad Hubbard <bhubbard@redhat.com> wrote:
> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11410 maybe?
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
> >> Hi Alexey,
> >>
> >> On 02/03/2017 07:11 AM, Alexey Sheplyakov wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>>> I'm still merging RGW backports and there a few more miscellaneous backports still in the queue.
> >>>
> >>> Any chance to have https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13004 included in 10.2.6?
> >>
> >> Thanks for rebasing it :-) It now needs to go through a round of testing, which may or may not happen. Note however that you can run the relevant rgw teuthology jobs to test this pull request and if they succeed it will be merged.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>>       Alexey
> >>> --
> >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> >>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Brad
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Are we ready for jewel 10.2.6?

[Vaibhav Bhembre]

Would it be possible to include http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17821 
(i.e. https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13496) into 10.2.6? 

On 02/16, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> 
> > Op 16 februari 2017 om 11:55 schreef Dan van der Ster <dan@vanderster.com>:
> > 
> > 
> > Hi guys,
> > 
> > How close is 10.2.6? It would be really nice if this one-liner could
> > be included: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18708
> > 
> 
> I checked, but there is/was no PR against the Jewel branch, only the one against master: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/12973
> 
> So I doubt it will make it in.
> 
> Wido
> 
> 
> > Cheers, Dan
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Brad Hubbard <bhubbard@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11410 maybe?
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
> > >> Hi Alexey,
> > >>
> > >> On 02/03/2017 07:11 AM, Alexey Sheplyakov wrote:
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>>> I'm still merging RGW backports and there a few more miscellaneous backports still in the queue.
> > >>>
> > >>> Any chance to have https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13004 included in 10.2.6?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for rebasing it :-) It now needs to go through a round of testing, which may or may not happen. Note however that you can run the relevant rgw teuthology jobs to test this pull request and if they succeed it will be merged.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> Best regards,
> > >>>       Alexey
> > >>> --
> > >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> > >>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > >>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> > >> --
> > >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> > >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cheers,
> > > Brad
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Are we ready for jewel 10.2.6?

[Nathan Cutler]

Hi Jason, John, Josh, Yehuda:

The following PRs and issues have been requested as "last-minute" items 
for 10.2.6 - see their current status below. Should any of these be 
considered blockers for 10.2.6? That said, if you're ready to give a 
green light for 10.2.6 now, please don't hesitate to do so.

RGW
- http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18258 (no backport PR yet)
- http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18331 
(https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13358 - merged, will be in 10.2.6)
- http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18563 
(https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13004 - waiting for Yehuda's approval)
- http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17756 - bucket resharding feature 
(https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13341 - waiting for Yehuda's approval)

CORE/COMMON
- http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14115 (no backport PR yet, master PR 
still open)
- http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18582 
(https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13131 - backport PR pending; affects 
upgrade, so will be included in 10.2.6)
- http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18791 
(https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13214 - in testing)
- http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18794 
(https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13232 - conflict)
- http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18812 
(https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13270 - conflict)
- http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17334 
(https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11410 - merged, will be in 10.2.6)
- http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17821 
(https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13496 - in testing)

CEPHFS
- http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18708 
(https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13459 - in testing)

Re: Are we ready for jewel 10.2.6?

[Josh Durgin]

On 02/20/2017 06:57 AM, Nathan Cutler wrote:
> Hi Jason, John, Josh, Yehuda:
>
> The following PRs and issues have been requested as "last-minute" items
> for 10.2.6 - see their current status below. Should any of these be
> considered blockers for 10.2.6? That said, if you're ready to give a
> green light for 10.2.6 now, please don't hesitate to do so.
>
> CORE/COMMON
> - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14115 (no backport PR yet, master PR
> still open)

This is just diagnostics still - the underlying issue isn't fixed by
that PR.

> - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18582
> (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13131 - backport PR pending; affects
> upgrade, so will be included in 10.2.6)

Sounds good.

> - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18791
> (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13214 - in testing)
> - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18794
> (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13232 - conflict)
> - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18812
> (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13270 - conflict)

This one is a blocker - it's a severe upgrade issue for hammer clients
under some circumstances.

> - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17334
> (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11410 - merged, will be in 10.2.6)
> - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17821
> (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13496 - in testing)

I think the rest are less critical and can wait for 10.2.7.

Thanks!
Josh