Re: ceph v10.2.4 QE validation status

[Abhishek L <abhishek@suse.com>]

Sage Weil writes:

> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Abhishek L wrote:
>>
>> Hi Sage, Greg,
>>
>>
>> Yuri Weinstein writes:
>>
>> > See updated status - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-32
>> >
>> > Outstanding issues:
>> >
>> > knfs - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16397 (same as in v10.2.3, Greg
>> > pls review/approve, assumed Approved ?)
>> >
>> > upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17847 ((Sage
>> > pls review/approve, seems persistent, but maybe not a showstopper)
>> >
>> > upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel) - deprecated (Nathan is still working
>> > to make it pass, see issues in the tacker summary above)
>> >
>> > Sage, jewel 10.2.4 can be released as soon as you agree with the
>> > findings/summary.
>>
>> Do you think we're ready to release 10.2.4 yet?
>
> I'm reproducing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17847 with logs to make
> sure this isn't a regression.
>
> We can ignore the infernalis runs.
>
> I think we can ignore the knfs selinux issue too.. Greg, can you confirm?
>
Added the prs 12001 & 12167 on top of the jewel branch and scheduled rados runs
at
http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2016-11-29_10:22:25-rados-wip-jewel-10-2-4-distro-basic-smithi/ &

updated the tracker at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17851#note-17,
with details of the test. I'll update the progress once the suite goes
through

Best,
Abhishek