From: Abhishek L <abhishek@suse.com>
To: Sage Weil <sweil@redhat.com>, Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@redhat.com>
Cc: Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
Abhishek Varshney <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com>,
"Dachary, Loic" <ldachary@redhat.com>,
"Dachary, Loic" <loic@dachary.org>,
"Dillaman, Jason" <dillaman@redhat.com>,
Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.cz>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>, John Spray <jspray@redhat.com>,
"Durgin, Josh" <jdurgin@redhat.com>,
Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: ceph v10.2.4 QE validation status
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:39:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r362tr92.fsf@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMMFjmGRO7F30WwU8NwMU=t3bEXEhz1G6bwZwqyQJrp7mceZdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Sage, Greg,
Yuri Weinstein writes:
> See updated status - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-32
>
> Outstanding issues:
>
> knfs - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16397 (same as in v10.2.3, Greg
> pls review/approve, assumed Approved ?)
>
> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17847 ((Sage
> pls review/approve, seems persistent, but maybe not a showstopper)
>
> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel) - deprecated (Nathan is still working
> to make it pass, see issues in the tacker summary above)
>
> Sage, jewel 10.2.4 can be released as soon as you agree with the
> findings/summary.
Do you think we're ready to release 10.2.4 yet?
Best,
Abhishek
>
> Thx
> YuriW
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-32
>>
>> The following suites were in scope of this point release validation:
>>
>> rados (subset 35/50 297 jobs)
>> rbd
>> rgw
>> fs
>> krbd
>> kcephfs
>> knfs
>> rest
>> hadoop
>> samba
>> ceph-deploy
>> ceph-disk
>> upgrade/client-upgrade
>> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel)
>> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel) - deprecated
>> powercycle
>> (please let me know if any suites are missing from this ^ list)
>>
>> ==============================
>> Issues requiring approval/decision:
>>
>> fs - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17832 (Greg pls review/approve)
>>
>> krbd - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17221 (Jason, Ilya pls review/approve)
>>
>> knfs - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16397 (same as in v10.2.3, Greg
>> pls review/approve)
>>
>> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17847 ((Sage
>> pls review/approve)
>>
>> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel) - deprecated, but Nathan is still working
>> to make it pass (Sage pls review/approve)
>>
>> powercycle - in progress
>>
>> Thx
>> YuriW
--
Abhishek Lekshmanan
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-23 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-11 16:47 ceph v10.2.4 QE validation status Yuri Weinstein
2016-11-11 16:58 ` Ilya Dryomov
2016-11-13 12:15 ` John Spray
2016-11-13 12:34 ` Nathan Cutler
2016-11-14 22:20 ` Yuri Weinstein
2016-11-15 8:18 ` Nathan Cutler
2016-11-23 10:39 ` Abhishek L [this message]
2016-11-23 14:39 ` Gregory Farnum
2016-11-23 14:42 ` Sage Weil
2016-11-23 15:06 ` John Spray
2016-11-29 10:46 ` Abhishek L
2016-11-30 14:57 ` Abhishek L
2016-11-30 16:01 ` Sage Weil
2016-11-30 16:21 ` Abhishek L
2016-11-30 16:29 ` Abhishek L
2016-11-30 16:57 ` Sage Weil
2016-12-02 14:00 ` Abhishek L
2016-12-05 11:53 ` Abhishek L
2016-12-07 13:06 ` Alfredo Deza
2016-11-30 16:09 ` Josh Durgin
2016-11-30 16:23 ` Abhishek L
2016-11-30 16:35 ` Josh Durgin
2016-11-30 21:56 ` Ken Dreyer
2016-11-30 22:09 ` Abhishek L
2016-12-01 8:09 ` Yoann Moulin
2016-12-01 13:26 ` Alfredo Deza
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r362tr92.fsf@suse.com \
--to=abhishek@suse.com \
--cc=abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dillaman@redhat.com \
--cc=gfarnum@redhat.com \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=jdurgin@redhat.com \
--cc=jspray@redhat.com \
--cc=ldachary@redhat.com \
--cc=loic@dachary.org \
--cc=ncutler@suse.cz \
--cc=sweil@redhat.com \
--cc=yweinste@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.