Re: ceph v10.2.4 QE validation status

[Abhishek L <abhishek@suse.com>]

Josh Durgin writes:

> On 11/30/2016 06:57 AM, Abhishek L wrote:
>>
>> Abhishek L writes:
>>
>>> Sage Weil writes:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Abhishek L wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Sage, Greg,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yuri Weinstein writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> See updated status - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-32
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Outstanding issues:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> knfs - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16397 (same as in v10.2.3, Greg
>>>>>> pls review/approve, assumed Approved ?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17847 ((Sage
>>>>>> pls review/approve, seems persistent, but maybe not a showstopper)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel) - deprecated (Nathan is still working
>>>>>> to make it pass, see issues in the tacker summary above)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sage, jewel 10.2.4 can be released as soon as you agree with the
>>>>>> findings/summary.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you think we're ready to release 10.2.4 yet?
>>>>
>>>> I'm reproducing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17847 with logs to make
>>>> sure this isn't a regression.
>>>>
>>>> We can ignore the infernalis runs.
>>>>
>>>> I think we can ignore the knfs selinux issue too.. Greg, can you confirm?
>>>>
>>> Added the prs 12001 & 12167 on top of the jewel branch and scheduled rados runs
>>> at
>>> http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2016-11-29_10:22:25-rados-wip-jewel-10-2-4-distro-basic-smithi/ &
>>>
>>> updated the tracker at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17851#note-17,
>>> with details of the test. I'll update the progress once the suite goes
>>> through
>>
>> Had around 11 tests fail from 296 scheduled, there were a couple of
>> valgrind issues on ceph-mon (which were seen at earlier runs on jewel as
>> well) and an s3test failure, rest of the issues were looking related to
>> infrastructure as they were failing to get specific version numbers from
>> gitbuilders.
>>
>> Reported this issue as:
>>
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18089
>>
>> subsequent re runs are still failing with similar errors. The details
>> are updated at
>>
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-37
>>
>> The upgrade suite has also failed with similar errors.
>>
>> Overall it looks like we're close to cutting the release, as soon as we
>> can get through these infra errors
>
> We should also get https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/12207 in once the
> master version (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/12206) is merged -
> likely later today.

Do you want it in 10.2.4 itself? what all qe suites would you recommend if so?