Re: [PATCH 4/5] migration: Fix rare hang of migration_channel_read_peek()

[Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>]

Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:

> On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 05:24:36PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 11:52:46AM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
>> > In an unlikely case, when a migration stream is attached to the destination
>> > QEMU and only send <4 bytes to the channel as magic, it's possible that
>> > migration_channel_read_peek() may spin forever without yielding in the main
>> > thread causing two unwanted consequences:
>> > 
>> > - CPU will spin 100% waiting for the rest bytes until it reaches 4
>> > - (more importantly..) Main thread is stuck during this process as the qio
>> >   operation won't really yield the coroutine
>> > 
>> > Fix it by consuming the bytes that arrived.
>> > 
>> > Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/work_items/3889
>> > Cc: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
>> > Reported-by: Feifan Qian <bea1e@proton.me>
>> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
>> > ---
>> >  migration/channel.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> >  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> > 
>> > diff --git a/migration/channel.c b/migration/channel.c
>> > index 1e2935f926..28fe1d2906 100644
>> > --- a/migration/channel.c
>> > +++ b/migration/channel.c
>> > @@ -294,11 +294,31 @@ int migration_channel_read_peek(QIOChannel *ioc,
>> >              return -1;
>> >          }
>> >  
>> > -        if (len == buflen) {
>> > +        if (len == iov.iov_len) {
>> >              break;
>> > -        }
>> > +        } else if (len == 0) {
>> > +            qio_channel_wait_cond(ioc, G_IO_IN);
>> > +        } else {
>> > +            ssize_t received = len;
>> >  
>> > -        qio_channel_wait_cond(ioc, G_IO_IN);
>> > +            /*
>> > +             * Partially arrived, read out to make qio_channel_wait_cond()
>> > +             * won't return immediately, causing an unwanted spin on this
>> > +             * CPU.
>> > +             */
>> > +            iov.iov_len = len;
>> > +            len = qio_channel_readv_full(ioc, &iov, 1, NULL, NULL, 0, errp);
>> 
>> Sure this breaks the API behaviour that the caller is expecting to
>> see.
>> 
>> migration_channel_identify will call migration_channel_read_peek
>> to match the magic bytes.
>> 
>> But something later in the flow will actually try to read the magic
>> bytes.  By consuming them in this migration_channel_read_peek
>> method, surely we're breaking the code that wants to read the bytes
>> later.
>
> Ah right, stupid me.  The best then is for partial read we apply a manual
> wait.
>
> I can also revert 604bb1badc ("migration: Properly wait on G_IO_IN when
> peeking messages"), looping with 1ms interval for data isn't too bad.  But
> the best is we only do that for partial, so:
>
> diff --git a/migration/channel.c b/migration/channel.c
> index 1e2935f926..88f89521f8 100644
> --- a/migration/channel.c
> +++ b/migration/channel.c
> @@ -296,9 +296,19 @@ int migration_channel_read_peek(QIOChannel *ioc,
>
>          if (len == buflen) {
>              break;
> +        } else if (len == 0) {
> +            qio_channel_wait_cond(ioc, G_IO_IN);
> +        } else {
> +            /*
> +             * When partially ready, we can't use qio_channel_wait_cond()
> +             * because it will return immediately.  Apply a manual wait.
> +             */
> +            if (qemu_in_coroutine()) {

There's no coroutine at this point, could replace this with an assert.

> +                qemu_co_sleep_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_REALTIME, 1000000);
> +            } else {
> +                g_usleep(1000);
> +            }
>          }
> -
> -        qio_channel_wait_cond(ioc, G_IO_IN);
>      }
>
>      return 0;
>
> Any preference?
>
> Thanks,
>
>> 
>> > +            /*
>> > +             * QIO_CHANNEL_ERR_BLOCK also shouldn't happen, due to the
>> > +             * prior peek just happened.  We should be pretty sure we will
>> > +             * read what we peeked, or the channel was broken.
>> > +             */
>> > +            if (len != received) {
>> > +                return -1;
>> > +            }
>> > +            iov.iov_base += received;
>> > +            iov.iov_len = buflen - received;
>> > +        }
>> >      }
>> >  
>> >      return 0;
>> > -- 
>> > 2.54.0
>> > 
>> 
>> With regards,
>> Daniel
>> -- 
>> |: https://berrange.com       ~~        https://hachyderm.io/@berrange :|
>> |: https://libvirt.org          ~~          https://entangle-photo.org :|
>> |: https://pixelfed.art/berrange   ~~    https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
>>