From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] powerpc: Use preemption model accessors
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 15:55:27 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o86rmgu8.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211110202448.4054153-4-valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> writes:
> Per PREEMPT_DYNAMIC, checking CONFIG_PREEMPT doesn't tell you the actual
> preemption model of the live kernel. Use the newly-introduced accessors
> instead.
>
> sched_init() -> preempt_dynamic_init() happens way before IRQs are set up,
> so this should be fine.
Despite the name interrupt_exit_kernel_prepare() is called before IRQs
are setup, traps and page faults are "interrupts" here.
So I'm not sure about adding that call there, because it will trigger a
WARN if called early in boot, which will trigger a trap and depending on
the context we may not survive.
I'd be happier if we can make it a build-time check.
cheers
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt.c
> index de10a2697258..c56c10b59be3 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt.c
> @@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ notrace unsigned long interrupt_exit_kernel_prepare(struct pt_regs *regs)
> /* Returning to a kernel context with local irqs enabled. */
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!(regs->msr & MSR_EE));
> again:
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT)) {
> + if (is_preempt_full()) {
> /* Return to preemptible kernel context */
> if (unlikely(current_thread_info()->flags & _TIF_NEED_RESCHED)) {
> if (preempt_count() == 0)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> index aac8c0412ff9..1cb31bbdc925 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static int __die(const char *str, struct pt_regs *regs, long err)
> printk("%s PAGE_SIZE=%luK%s%s%s%s%s%s %s\n",
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) ? "LE" : "BE",
> PAGE_SIZE / 1024, get_mmu_str(),
> - IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT) ? " PREEMPT" : "",
> + is_preempt_full() ? " PREEMPT" : "",
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP) ? " SMP" : "",
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP) ? (" NR_CPUS=" __stringify(NR_CPUS)) : "",
> debug_pagealloc_enabled() ? " DEBUG_PAGEALLOC" : "",
> --
> 2.25.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] powerpc: Use preemption model accessors
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 15:55:27 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o86rmgu8.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211110202448.4054153-4-valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> writes:
> Per PREEMPT_DYNAMIC, checking CONFIG_PREEMPT doesn't tell you the actual
> preemption model of the live kernel. Use the newly-introduced accessors
> instead.
>
> sched_init() -> preempt_dynamic_init() happens way before IRQs are set up,
> so this should be fine.
Despite the name interrupt_exit_kernel_prepare() is called before IRQs
are setup, traps and page faults are "interrupts" here.
So I'm not sure about adding that call there, because it will trigger a
WARN if called early in boot, which will trigger a trap and depending on
the context we may not survive.
I'd be happier if we can make it a build-time check.
cheers
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt.c
> index de10a2697258..c56c10b59be3 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt.c
> @@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ notrace unsigned long interrupt_exit_kernel_prepare(struct pt_regs *regs)
> /* Returning to a kernel context with local irqs enabled. */
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!(regs->msr & MSR_EE));
> again:
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT)) {
> + if (is_preempt_full()) {
> /* Return to preemptible kernel context */
> if (unlikely(current_thread_info()->flags & _TIF_NEED_RESCHED)) {
> if (preempt_count() == 0)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> index aac8c0412ff9..1cb31bbdc925 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static int __die(const char *str, struct pt_regs *regs, long err)
> printk("%s PAGE_SIZE=%luK%s%s%s%s%s%s %s\n",
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) ? "LE" : "BE",
> PAGE_SIZE / 1024, get_mmu_str(),
> - IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT) ? " PREEMPT" : "",
> + is_preempt_full() ? " PREEMPT" : "",
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP) ? " SMP" : "",
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP) ? (" NR_CPUS=" __stringify(NR_CPUS)) : "",
> debug_pagealloc_enabled() ? " DEBUG_PAGEALLOC" : "",
> --
> 2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-11 4:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-10 20:24 [PATCH v2 0/5] preempt: PREEMPT vs PREEMPT_DYNAMIC configs fixup Valentin Schneider
2021-11-10 20:24 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-11-10 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] preempt: Restore preemption model selection configs Valentin Schneider
2021-11-10 20:24 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-11-11 8:58 ` Marco Elver
2021-11-11 8:58 ` Marco Elver
2021-11-11 12:22 ` [tip: sched/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Valentin Schneider
2021-11-10 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] preempt/dynamic: Introduce preempt mode accessors Valentin Schneider
2021-11-10 20:24 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-11-11 3:16 ` Mike Galbraith
2021-11-11 3:16 ` Mike Galbraith
2021-11-11 3:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2021-11-11 3:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2021-11-11 3:47 ` Mike Galbraith
2021-11-11 3:47 ` Mike Galbraith
2021-11-11 3:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2021-11-11 3:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2021-11-11 9:36 ` Marco Elver
2021-11-11 9:36 ` Marco Elver
2021-11-11 10:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2021-11-11 10:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2021-11-11 10:56 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-11-11 10:56 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-11-11 11:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2021-11-11 11:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2021-11-11 8:54 ` Marco Elver
2021-11-11 8:54 ` Marco Elver
2021-11-11 10:56 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-11-11 10:56 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-11-16 13:29 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-11-16 13:29 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-11-22 16:37 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-11-22 16:37 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-11-10 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] powerpc: Use preemption model accessors Valentin Schneider
2021-11-10 20:24 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-11-11 4:55 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2021-11-11 4:55 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-11-15 15:29 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-11-15 15:29 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-11-16 13:41 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-11-16 13:41 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-11-22 16:44 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-11-22 16:44 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-11-10 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] kscan: " Valentin Schneider
2021-11-10 20:24 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-11-11 9:11 ` Marco Elver
2021-11-11 9:11 ` Marco Elver
2021-11-11 9:39 ` Marco Elver
2021-11-11 9:39 ` Marco Elver
2021-11-11 10:57 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-11-11 10:57 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-11-10 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ftrace: Use preemption model accessors for trace header printout Valentin Schneider
2021-11-10 20:24 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-11-10 20:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-10 20:36 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o86rmgu8.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.