All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Andrew Walbran <qwandor@google.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/24] psci: Accessor for configured PSCI function IDs
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:47:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o8jo5go3.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201116204318.63987-3-dbrazdil@google.com>

On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 20:42:56 +0000,
David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com> wrote:
> 
> Function IDs used by PSCI are configurable for v0.1 via DT/APCI. If the
> host is using PSCI v0.1, KVM's host PSCI proxy needs to use the same IDs.
> Expose the array holding the information with a read-only accessor.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c | 14 ++++++--------
>  include/linux/psci.h         | 10 ++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> index 213c68418a65..d835f3d8b121 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> @@ -58,16 +58,14 @@ typedef unsigned long (psci_fn)(unsigned long, unsigned long,
>  				unsigned long, unsigned long);
>  static psci_fn *invoke_psci_fn;
>  
> -enum psci_function {
> -	PSCI_FN_CPU_SUSPEND,
> -	PSCI_FN_CPU_ON,
> -	PSCI_FN_CPU_OFF,
> -	PSCI_FN_MIGRATE,
> -	PSCI_FN_MAX,
> -};
> -
>  static u32 psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_MAX];
>  
> +u32 psci_get_function_id(enum psci_function fn)
> +{
> +	WARN_ON(fn >= PSCI_FN_MAX);

If we are going to warn on something that is out of bounds, maybe we
shouldn't perform the access at all? And maybe check for lower bound
as well?

> +	return psci_function_id[fn];
> +}
> +
>  #define PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_MASK		\
>  				(PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_ID_MASK | \
>  				PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_TYPE_MASK | \
> diff --git a/include/linux/psci.h b/include/linux/psci.h
> index 2a1bfb890e58..5b49a5c82d6f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/psci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/psci.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,16 @@ bool psci_power_state_is_valid(u32 state);
>  int psci_set_osi_mode(bool enable);
>  bool psci_has_osi_support(void);
>  
> +enum psci_function {
> +	PSCI_FN_CPU_SUSPEND,
> +	PSCI_FN_CPU_ON,
> +	PSCI_FN_CPU_OFF,
> +	PSCI_FN_MIGRATE,
> +	PSCI_FN_MAX,
> +};
> +
> +u32 psci_get_function_id(enum psci_function fn);
> +
>  struct psci_operations {
>  	u32 (*get_version)(void);
>  	int (*cpu_suspend)(u32 state, unsigned long entry_point);
> -- 
> 2.29.2.299.gdc1121823c-goog
> 
> 

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Andrew Walbran <qwandor@google.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Scull <ascull@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/24] psci: Accessor for configured PSCI function IDs
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:47:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o8jo5go3.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201116204318.63987-3-dbrazdil@google.com>

On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 20:42:56 +0000,
David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com> wrote:
> 
> Function IDs used by PSCI are configurable for v0.1 via DT/APCI. If the
> host is using PSCI v0.1, KVM's host PSCI proxy needs to use the same IDs.
> Expose the array holding the information with a read-only accessor.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c | 14 ++++++--------
>  include/linux/psci.h         | 10 ++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> index 213c68418a65..d835f3d8b121 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> @@ -58,16 +58,14 @@ typedef unsigned long (psci_fn)(unsigned long, unsigned long,
>  				unsigned long, unsigned long);
>  static psci_fn *invoke_psci_fn;
>  
> -enum psci_function {
> -	PSCI_FN_CPU_SUSPEND,
> -	PSCI_FN_CPU_ON,
> -	PSCI_FN_CPU_OFF,
> -	PSCI_FN_MIGRATE,
> -	PSCI_FN_MAX,
> -};
> -
>  static u32 psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_MAX];
>  
> +u32 psci_get_function_id(enum psci_function fn)
> +{
> +	WARN_ON(fn >= PSCI_FN_MAX);

If we are going to warn on something that is out of bounds, maybe we
shouldn't perform the access at all? And maybe check for lower bound
as well?

> +	return psci_function_id[fn];
> +}
> +
>  #define PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_MASK		\
>  				(PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_ID_MASK | \
>  				PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_TYPE_MASK | \
> diff --git a/include/linux/psci.h b/include/linux/psci.h
> index 2a1bfb890e58..5b49a5c82d6f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/psci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/psci.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,16 @@ bool psci_power_state_is_valid(u32 state);
>  int psci_set_osi_mode(bool enable);
>  bool psci_has_osi_support(void);
>  
> +enum psci_function {
> +	PSCI_FN_CPU_SUSPEND,
> +	PSCI_FN_CPU_ON,
> +	PSCI_FN_CPU_OFF,
> +	PSCI_FN_MIGRATE,
> +	PSCI_FN_MAX,
> +};
> +
> +u32 psci_get_function_id(enum psci_function fn);
> +
>  struct psci_operations {
>  	u32 (*get_version)(void);
>  	int (*cpu_suspend)(u32 state, unsigned long entry_point);
> -- 
> 2.29.2.299.gdc1121823c-goog
> 
> 

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
	Andrew Scull <ascull@google.com>,
	Andrew Walbran <qwandor@google.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/24] psci: Accessor for configured PSCI function IDs
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:47:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o8jo5go3.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201116204318.63987-3-dbrazdil@google.com>

On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 20:42:56 +0000,
David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com> wrote:
> 
> Function IDs used by PSCI are configurable for v0.1 via DT/APCI. If the
> host is using PSCI v0.1, KVM's host PSCI proxy needs to use the same IDs.
> Expose the array holding the information with a read-only accessor.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c | 14 ++++++--------
>  include/linux/psci.h         | 10 ++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> index 213c68418a65..d835f3d8b121 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> @@ -58,16 +58,14 @@ typedef unsigned long (psci_fn)(unsigned long, unsigned long,
>  				unsigned long, unsigned long);
>  static psci_fn *invoke_psci_fn;
>  
> -enum psci_function {
> -	PSCI_FN_CPU_SUSPEND,
> -	PSCI_FN_CPU_ON,
> -	PSCI_FN_CPU_OFF,
> -	PSCI_FN_MIGRATE,
> -	PSCI_FN_MAX,
> -};
> -
>  static u32 psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_MAX];
>  
> +u32 psci_get_function_id(enum psci_function fn)
> +{
> +	WARN_ON(fn >= PSCI_FN_MAX);

If we are going to warn on something that is out of bounds, maybe we
shouldn't perform the access at all? And maybe check for lower bound
as well?

> +	return psci_function_id[fn];
> +}
> +
>  #define PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_MASK		\
>  				(PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_ID_MASK | \
>  				PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_TYPE_MASK | \
> diff --git a/include/linux/psci.h b/include/linux/psci.h
> index 2a1bfb890e58..5b49a5c82d6f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/psci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/psci.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,16 @@ bool psci_power_state_is_valid(u32 state);
>  int psci_set_osi_mode(bool enable);
>  bool psci_has_osi_support(void);
>  
> +enum psci_function {
> +	PSCI_FN_CPU_SUSPEND,
> +	PSCI_FN_CPU_ON,
> +	PSCI_FN_CPU_OFF,
> +	PSCI_FN_MIGRATE,
> +	PSCI_FN_MAX,
> +};
> +
> +u32 psci_get_function_id(enum psci_function fn);
> +
>  struct psci_operations {
>  	u32 (*get_version)(void);
>  	int (*cpu_suspend)(u32 state, unsigned long entry_point);
> -- 
> 2.29.2.299.gdc1121823c-goog
> 
> 

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-23 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 135+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-16 20:42 [PATCH v2 00/24] Opt-in always-on nVHE hypervisor David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:42 ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:42 ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 01/24] psci: Support psci_ops.get_version for v0.1 David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:42   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:42   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 02/24] psci: Accessor for configured PSCI function IDs David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:42   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:42   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-23 13:47   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-11-23 13:47     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 13:47     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-16 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 03/24] arm64: Make cpu_logical_map() take unsigned int David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:42   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:42   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 04/24] arm64: Move MAIR_EL1_SET to asm/memory.h David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:42   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:42   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-23 13:52   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 13:52     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 13:52     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-25 10:31     ` David Brazdil
2020-11-25 10:31       ` David Brazdil
2020-11-25 10:31       ` David Brazdil
2020-11-25 11:21       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-25 11:21         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-25 11:21         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-25 13:26         ` David Brazdil
2020-11-25 13:26           ` David Brazdil
2020-11-25 13:26           ` David Brazdil
2020-11-25 13:33           ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-25 13:33             ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-25 13:33             ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-16 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 05/24] kvm: arm64: Initialize MAIR_EL2 using a constant David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:42   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:42   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 06/24] kvm: arm64: Move hyp-init params to a per-CPU struct David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-23 14:20   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 14:20     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 14:20     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-25 10:39     ` David Brazdil
2020-11-25 10:39       ` David Brazdil
2020-11-25 10:39       ` David Brazdil
2020-11-25 10:49       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-25 10:49         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-25 10:49         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-16 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 07/24] kvm: arm64: Refactor handle_trap to use a switch David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-23 14:32   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 14:32     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 14:32     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-16 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 08/24] kvm: arm64: Add SMC handler in nVHE EL2 David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-23 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 18:00     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 18:00     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-16 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 09/24] kvm: arm64: Add .hyp.data..ro_after_init ELF section David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 10/24] kvm: arm64: Support per_cpu_ptr in nVHE hyp code David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 11/24] kvm: arm64: Create nVHE copy of cpu_logical_map David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 12/24] kvm: arm64: Bootstrap PSCI SMC handler in nVHE EL2 David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-23 17:55   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 17:55     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 17:55     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-16 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 13/24] kvm: arm64: Add offset for hyp VA <-> PA conversion David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 14/24] kvm: arm64: Forward safe PSCI SMCs coming from host David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 15/24] kvm: arm64: Extract parts of el2_setup into a macro David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-23 15:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 15:27     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 15:27     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-25 12:57     ` David Brazdil
2020-11-25 12:57       ` David Brazdil
2020-11-25 12:57       ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 16/24] kvm: arm64: Extract __do_hyp_init into a helper function David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 17/24] kvm: arm64: Add CPU entry point in nVHE hyp David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 18/24] kvm: arm64: Add function to enter host from KVM nVHE hyp code David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 19/24] kvm: arm64: Intercept host's PSCI_CPU_ON SMCs David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-23 17:04   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 17:04     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 17:04     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-16 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 20/24] kvm: arm64: Intercept host's CPU_SUSPEND PSCI SMCs David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-23 17:22   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 17:22     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 17:22     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-16 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 21/24] kvm: arm64: Add kvm-arm.protected early kernel parameter David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-23 17:30   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 17:30     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 17:30     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-16 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 22/24] kvm: arm64: Keep nVHE EL2 vector installed David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 23/24] kvm: arm64: Trap host SMCs in protected mode David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-23 17:36   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 17:36     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 17:36     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-16 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 24/24] kvm: arm64: Fix EL2 mode availability checks David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 20:43   ` David Brazdil
2020-11-23 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 00/24] Opt-in always-on nVHE hypervisor Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 13:44   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 13:44   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 18:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 18:01   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 18:01   ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87o8jo5go3.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=dbrazdil@google.com \
    --cc=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=qwandor@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.