From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@gmail.com>,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/opregion: Remove null check before kfree
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 09:30:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o9qw8d1u.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1504099876-4142-1-git-send-email-himanshujha199640@gmail.com>
On Wed, 30 Aug 2017, Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@gmail.com> wrote:
> kfree on NULL pointer is a no-op and therefore checking is redundant.
IMO the code has more clarity as it is.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Signed-off-by: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
> index 98154ef..2427b40 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
> @@ -830,10 +830,8 @@ void intel_opregion_unregister(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> memunmap(opregion->rvda);
> opregion->rvda = NULL;
> }
> - if (opregion->vbt_firmware) {
> - kfree(opregion->vbt_firmware);
> - opregion->vbt_firmware = NULL;
> - }
> + kfree(opregion->vbt_firmware);
> + opregion->vbt_firmware = NULL;
> opregion->header = NULL;
> opregion->acpi = NULL;
> opregion->swsci = NULL;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@gmail.com>
Cc: joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
airlied@linux.ie, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/opregion: Remove null check before kfree
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 09:30:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o9qw8d1u.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1504099876-4142-1-git-send-email-himanshujha199640@gmail.com>
On Wed, 30 Aug 2017, Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@gmail.com> wrote:
> kfree on NULL pointer is a no-op and therefore checking is redundant.
IMO the code has more clarity as it is.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Signed-off-by: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
> index 98154ef..2427b40 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
> @@ -830,10 +830,8 @@ void intel_opregion_unregister(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> memunmap(opregion->rvda);
> opregion->rvda = NULL;
> }
> - if (opregion->vbt_firmware) {
> - kfree(opregion->vbt_firmware);
> - opregion->vbt_firmware = NULL;
> - }
> + kfree(opregion->vbt_firmware);
> + opregion->vbt_firmware = NULL;
> opregion->header = NULL;
> opregion->acpi = NULL;
> opregion->swsci = NULL;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-31 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-30 13:31 [PATCH] drm/i915/opregion: Remove null check before kfree Himanshu Jha
2017-08-31 6:30 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2017-08-31 6:30 ` Jani Nikula
2017-09-27 12:47 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-09-27 16:39 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o9qw8d1u.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=himanshujha199640@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.