All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitriy Monakhov <dmonakhov@sw.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Dmitriy Monakhov <dmonakhov@sw.ru>,
	Dmitriy Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	devel@openvz.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]  incorrect error handling inside generic_file_direct_write
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:18:32 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87psapz1zr.fsf@sw.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061212015232.eacfbb46.akpm@osdl.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:52:32 -0800")

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1433 bytes --]

Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes:

> On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:20:52 +0300
> Dmitriy Monakhov <dmonakhov@sw.ru> wrote:
>
>> > XFS (at least) can call generic_file_direct_write() with i_mutex not held. 
>> > And vmtruncate() expects i_mutex to be held.
>> >
>> > I guess a suitable solution would be to push this problem back up to the
>> > callers: let them decide whether to run vmtruncate() and if so, to ensure
>> > that i_mutex is held.
>> >
>> > The existence of generic_file_aio_write_nolock() makes that rather messy
>> > though.
>> This means we may call generic_file_aio_write_nolock() without i_mutex, right?
>> but call trace is :
>>   generic_file_aio_write_nolock() 
>>   ->generic_file_buffered_write() /* i_mutex not held here */ 
>> but according to filemaps locking rules: mm/filemap.c:77
>>  ..
>>  *  ->i_mutex			(generic_file_buffered_write)
>>  *    ->mmap_sem		(fault_in_pages_readable->do_page_fault)
>>  ..
>> I'm confused a litle bit, where is the truth? 
>
> xfs_write() calls generic_file_direct_write() without taking i_mutex for
> O_DIRECT writes.
Yes, but my quastion is about __generic_file_aio_write_nolock().
As i understand _nolock sufix means that i_mutex was already locked 
by caller, am i right ?
If yes, than __generic_file_aio_write_nolock() is beter place for vmtrancate() 
acclivity after generic_file_direct_write() has fail.
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
-------

[-- Attachment #2: diff-generic-direct-io-write-fix --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 587 bytes --]

diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index 7b84dc8..723d2ca 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -2282,6 +2282,15 @@ __generic_file_aio_write_nolock(struct k
 
 		written = generic_file_direct_write(iocb, iov, &nr_segs, pos,
 							ppos, count, ocount);
+		if (written < 0) {
+			loff_t isize = i_size_read(inode);
+			/*
+			 * generic_file_direct_write() may have instantiated 
+			 * a few blocks outside i_size. Trim these off again.
+			 */
+			if (pos + count > isize)
+				vmtruncate(inode, isize);
+		}
 		if (written < 0 || written == count)
 			goto out;
 		/*

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dmitriy Monakhov <dmonakhov@sw.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Dmitriy Monakhov <dmonakhov@sw.ru>,
	Dmitriy Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <devel@openvz.org>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]  incorrect error handling inside generic_file_direct_write
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:18:32 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87psapz1zr.fsf@sw.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061212015232.eacfbb46.akpm@osdl.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:52:32 -0800")

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1433 bytes --]

Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes:

> On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:20:52 +0300
> Dmitriy Monakhov <dmonakhov@sw.ru> wrote:
>
>> > XFS (at least) can call generic_file_direct_write() with i_mutex not held. 
>> > And vmtruncate() expects i_mutex to be held.
>> >
>> > I guess a suitable solution would be to push this problem back up to the
>> > callers: let them decide whether to run vmtruncate() and if so, to ensure
>> > that i_mutex is held.
>> >
>> > The existence of generic_file_aio_write_nolock() makes that rather messy
>> > though.
>> This means we may call generic_file_aio_write_nolock() without i_mutex, right?
>> but call trace is :
>>   generic_file_aio_write_nolock() 
>>   ->generic_file_buffered_write() /* i_mutex not held here */ 
>> but according to filemaps locking rules: mm/filemap.c:77
>>  ..
>>  *  ->i_mutex			(generic_file_buffered_write)
>>  *    ->mmap_sem		(fault_in_pages_readable->do_page_fault)
>>  ..
>> I'm confused a litle bit, where is the truth? 
>
> xfs_write() calls generic_file_direct_write() without taking i_mutex for
> O_DIRECT writes.
Yes, but my quastion is about __generic_file_aio_write_nolock().
As i understand _nolock sufix means that i_mutex was already locked 
by caller, am i right ?
If yes, than __generic_file_aio_write_nolock() is beter place for vmtrancate() 
acclivity after generic_file_direct_write() has fail.
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
-------

[-- Attachment #2: diff-generic-direct-io-write-fix --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 587 bytes --]

diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index 7b84dc8..723d2ca 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -2282,6 +2282,15 @@ __generic_file_aio_write_nolock(struct k
 
 		written = generic_file_direct_write(iocb, iov, &nr_segs, pos,
 							ppos, count, ocount);
+		if (written < 0) {
+			loff_t isize = i_size_read(inode);
+			/*
+			 * generic_file_direct_write() may have instantiated 
+			 * a few blocks outside i_size. Trim these off again.
+			 */
+			if (pos + count > isize)
+				vmtruncate(inode, isize);
+		}
 		if (written < 0 || written == count)
 			goto out;
 		/*

  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-12 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-11 13:34 [PATCH] incorrect error handling inside generic_file_direct_write Dmitriy Monakhov
2006-12-11 13:34 ` Dmitriy Monakhov
2006-12-11 12:38 ` [Devel] " Kirill Korotaev
2006-12-11 12:38   ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-12-11 20:40 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-11 20:40   ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-11 20:40   ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-12  9:22   ` Dmitriy Monakhov
2006-12-12  9:22     ` Dmitriy Monakhov
2006-12-12  9:22     ` Dmitriy Monakhov
2006-12-12  6:36     ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-12  6:36       ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-12  6:36       ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-12 12:20   ` Dmitriy Monakhov
2006-12-12 12:20     ` Dmitriy Monakhov
2006-12-12 12:20     ` Dmitriy Monakhov
2006-12-12  9:52     ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-12  9:52       ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-12  9:52       ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-12 13:18       ` Dmitriy Monakhov [this message]
2006-12-12 13:18         ` Dmitriy Monakhov
2006-12-12 10:40         ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-12 10:40           ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-12 10:40           ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-12 23:14           ` Dmitriy Monakhov
2006-12-12 23:14             ` Dmitriy Monakhov
2006-12-13  2:43           ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-12-13  2:43             ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-12-13  2:43             ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-12-15 10:43             ` 'Christoph Hellwig'
2006-12-15 10:43               ` 'Christoph Hellwig'
2006-12-15 18:53               ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-12-15 18:53                 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-12-15 18:53                 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2007-01-02 11:17                 ` 'Christoph Hellwig'
2007-01-02 11:17                   ` 'Christoph Hellwig'

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87psapz1zr.fsf@sw.ru \
    --to=dmonakhov@sw.ru \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.