From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Qin Jian <qinjian@cqplus1.com>
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, p.zabel@pengutronix.de,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, broonie@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
wells.lu@sunplus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/10] irqchip: Add Sunplus SP7021 interrupt controller driver
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 09:02:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r1ao23fp.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e88ea4cf28ba69a41f6d1b4dd4128b82a6095c29.1638515726.git.qinjian@cqplus1.com>
On Fri, 03 Dec 2021 07:34:25 +0000,
Qin Jian <qinjian@cqplus1.com> wrote:
>
> Add interrupt controller driver for Sunplus SP7021 SoC.
>
> This is the interrupt controller in P-chip which collects all interrupt
> sources in P-chip and routes them to parent interrupt controller in C-chip.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qin Jian <qinjian@cqplus1.com>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 9 +
> drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/irqchip/irq-sp7021-intc.c | 284 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 295 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-sp7021-intc.c
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 6b3bbe021..febbd97bf 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -2665,6 +2665,7 @@ F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunplus,sp7021-clkc.yaml
> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sunplus,sp7021-intc.yaml
> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/sunplus,reset.yaml
> F: drivers/clk/clk-sp7021.c
> +F: drivers/irqchip/irq-sp7021-intc.c
> F: drivers/reset/reset-sunplus.c
> F: include/dt-bindings/clock/sp-sp7021.h
> F: include/dt-bindings/reset/sp-sp7021.h
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> index aca7b595c..b9429b8d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> @@ -602,4 +602,13 @@ config APPLE_AIC
> Support for the Apple Interrupt Controller found on Apple Silicon SoCs,
> such as the M1.
>
> +config SUNPLUS_SP7021_INTC
> + bool "Sunplus SP7021 interrupt controller"
> + help
> + Support for the Sunplus SP7021 Interrupt Controller IP core.
> + SP7021 SoC has 2 Chips: C-Chip & P-Chip. This is used as a
> + chained controller, routing all interrupt source in P-Chip to
> + the primary controller on C-Chip.
> + This is selected automatically by platform config.
> +
> endmenu
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> index f88cbf36a..75411f654 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> @@ -116,3 +116,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_REALTEK_RTL) += irq-realtek-rtl.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_WPCM450_AIC) += irq-wpcm450-aic.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_IRQ_IDT3243X) += irq-idt3243x.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_APPLE_AIC) += irq-apple-aic.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SUNPLUS_SP7021_INTC) += irq-sp7021-intc.o
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sp7021-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sp7021-intc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..beabc64d5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sp7021-intc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,284 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) Sunplus Technology Co., Ltd.
> + * All rights reserved.
> + */
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +
> +#define SP_INTC_HWIRQ_MIN 0
> +#define SP_INTC_HWIRQ_MAX 223
> +
> +#define SP_INTC_NR_IRQS (SP_INTC_HWIRQ_MAX - SP_INTC_HWIRQ_MIN + 1)
> +#define SP_INTC_NR_GROUPS DIV_ROUND_UP(SP_INTC_NR_IRQS, 32)
> +#define SP_INTC_REG_SIZE (SP_INTC_NR_GROUPS * 4)
> +
> +/* REG_GROUP_0 regs */
> +#define REG_INTR_TYPE (sp_intc.g0)
> +#define REG_INTR_POLARITY (REG_INTR_TYPE + SP_INTC_REG_SIZE)
> +#define REG_INTR_PRIORITY (REG_INTR_POLARITY + SP_INTC_REG_SIZE)
> +#define REG_INTR_MASK (REG_INTR_PRIORITY + SP_INTC_REG_SIZE)
> +
> +/* REG_GROUP_1 regs */
> +#define REG_INTR_CLEAR (sp_intc.g1)
> +#define REG_MASKED_EXT1 (REG_INTR_CLEAR + SP_INTC_REG_SIZE)
> +#define REG_MASKED_EXT0 (REG_MASKED_EXT1 + SP_INTC_REG_SIZE)
> +#define REG_INTR_GROUP (REG_INTR_CLEAR + 31 * 4)
> +
> +#define GROUP_MASK (BIT(SP_INTC_NR_GROUPS) - 1)
> +#define GROUP_SHIFT_EXT1 (0)
> +#define GROUP_SHIFT_EXT0 (8)
> +
> +/*
> + * When GPIO_INT0~7 set to edge trigger, doesn't work properly.
> + * WORKAROUND: change it to level trigger, and toggle the polarity
> + * at ACK/Handler to make the HW work.
> + */
> +#define GPIO_INT0_HWIRQ 120
> +#define GPIO_INT7_HWIRQ 127
> +#define IS_GPIO_INT(irq) \
> +({ \
> + u32 i = irq; \
> + (i >= GPIO_INT0_HWIRQ) && (i <= GPIO_INT7_HWIRQ); \
> +})
> +
> +/* index of states */
> +enum {
> + _IS_EDGE = 0,
> + _IS_LOW,
> + _IS_ACTIVE
> +};
> +
> +#define STATE_BIT(irq, idx) (((irq) - GPIO_INT0_HWIRQ) * 3 + (idx))
> +#define ASSIGN_STATE(irq, idx, v) assign_bit(STATE_BIT(irq, idx), sp_intc.states, v)
> +#define TEST_STATE(irq, idx) test_bit(STATE_BIT(irq, idx), sp_intc.states)
> +
> +static struct sp_intctl {
> + /*
> + * REG_GROUP_0: include type/polarity/priority/mask regs.
> + * REG_GROUP_1: include clear/masked_ext0/masked_ext1/group regs.
> + */
> + void __iomem *g0; // REG_GROUP_0 base
> + void __iomem *g1; // REG_GROUP_1 base
> +
> + struct irq_domain *domain;
> + raw_spinlock_t lock;
> +
> + /*
> + * store GPIO_INT states
> + * each interrupt has 3 states: is_edge, is_low, is_active
> + */
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(states, (GPIO_INT7_HWIRQ - GPIO_INT0_HWIRQ + 1) * 3);
> +} sp_intc;
> +
> +static struct irq_chip sp_intc_chip;
> +
> +static void sp_intc_assign_bit(u32 hwirq, void __iomem *base, bool value)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sp_intc.lock, flags);
> + __assign_bit(hwirq, base, value);
__assign_bit() on an MMIO mapping? No. Why do you think we have
separate MMIO accessors?
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sp_intc.lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static void sp_intc_ack_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + u32 hwirq = d->hwirq;
> +
> + if (unlikely(IS_GPIO_INT(hwirq) && TEST_STATE(hwirq, _IS_EDGE))) { // WORKAROUND
> + sp_intc_assign_bit(hwirq, REG_INTR_POLARITY, !TEST_STATE(hwirq, _IS_LOW));
> + ASSIGN_STATE(hwirq, _IS_ACTIVE, true);
> + }
> +
> + sp_intc_assign_bit(hwirq, REG_INTR_CLEAR, 1);
> +}
> +
> +static void sp_intc_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + sp_intc_assign_bit(d->hwirq, REG_INTR_MASK, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void sp_intc_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + sp_intc_assign_bit(d->hwirq, REG_INTR_MASK, 1);
> +}
> +
> +static int sp_intc_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> +{
> + u32 hwirq = d->hwirq;
> + bool is_edge = !(type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_MASK);
> + bool is_low = (type == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW || type == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING);
> +
> + irq_set_handler_locked(d, is_edge ? handle_edge_irq : handle_level_irq);
> +
> + if (unlikely(IS_GPIO_INT(hwirq) && is_edge)) { // WORKAROUND
> + /* store states */
> + ASSIGN_STATE(hwirq, _IS_EDGE, is_edge);
> + ASSIGN_STATE(hwirq, _IS_LOW, is_low);
> + ASSIGN_STATE(hwirq, _IS_ACTIVE, false);
> + /* change to level */
> + is_edge = false;
> + }
> +
> + sp_intc_assign_bit(hwirq, REG_INTR_TYPE, is_edge);
> + sp_intc_assign_bit(hwirq, REG_INTR_POLARITY, is_low);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sp_intc_get_ext_irq(int ext_num)
> +{
> + void __iomem *base = ext_num ? REG_MASKED_EXT1 : REG_MASKED_EXT0;
> + u32 shift = ext_num ? GROUP_SHIFT_EXT1 : GROUP_SHIFT_EXT0;
> + u32 groups;
> + u32 pending_group;
> + u32 group;
> + u32 pending_irq;
> +
> + groups = readl_relaxed(REG_INTR_GROUP);
> + pending_group = (groups >> shift) & GROUP_MASK;
> + if (!pending_group)
> + return -1;
> +
> + group = fls(pending_group) - 1;
> + pending_irq = readl_relaxed(base + group * 4);
> + if (!pending_irq)
> + return -1;
> +
> + return (group * 32) + fls(pending_irq) - 1;
> +}
> +
> +static void sp_intc_handle_ext_cascaded(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> + int ext_num = (int)irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> + int hwirq;
> +
> + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> +
> + while ((hwirq = sp_intc_get_ext_irq(ext_num)) >= 0) {
> + if (unlikely(IS_GPIO_INT(hwirq) && TEST_STATE(hwirq, _IS_ACTIVE))) { // WORKAROUND
> + ASSIGN_STATE(hwirq, _IS_ACTIVE, false);
> + sp_intc_assign_bit(hwirq, REG_INTR_POLARITY, TEST_STATE(hwirq, _IS_LOW));
> + } else {
> + generic_handle_domain_irq(sp_intc.domain, hwirq);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +static int sp_intc_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static struct irq_chip sp_intc_chip = {
> + .name = "sp_intc",
> + .irq_ack = sp_intc_ack_irq,
> + .irq_mask = sp_intc_mask_irq,
> + .irq_unmask = sp_intc_unmask_irq,
> + .irq_set_type = sp_intc_set_type,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + .irq_set_affinity = sp_intc_set_affinity,
> +#endif
> +};
> +
> +static int sp_intc_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *domain,
> + unsigned int irq, irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
> +{
> + irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &sp_intc_chip, handle_level_irq);
> + irq_set_chip_data(irq, &sp_intc_chip);
> + irq_set_noprobe(irq);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_domain_ops sp_intc_dm_ops = {
> + .xlate = irq_domain_xlate_twocell,
> + .map = sp_intc_irq_domain_map,
> +};
> +
> +static int sp_intc_irq_map(struct device_node *node, int i)
> +{
> + unsigned int irq;
> +
> + irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, i);
> + if (!irq)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(irq, sp_intc_handle_ext_cascaded, (void *)i);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void sp_intc_set_ext(u32 hwirq, int ext_num)
> +{
> + sp_intc_assign_bit(hwirq, REG_INTR_PRIORITY, !ext_num);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sp_intc_set_ext);
No way. We don't export random symbols without a good justification,
and you didn't give any.
> +
> +int __init sp_intc_init_dt(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
This should be static.
> +{
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + sp_intc.g0 = of_iomap(node, 0);
> + if (!sp_intc.g0)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
> + sp_intc.g1 = of_iomap(node, 1);
> + if (!sp_intc.g1) {
> + ret = -ENXIO;
> + goto out_unmap0;
> + }
> +
> + ret = sp_intc_irq_map(node, 0); // EXT_INT0
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_unmap1;
> +
> + ret = sp_intc_irq_map(node, 1); // EXT_INT1
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_unmap1;
> +
> + /* initial regs */
> + for (i = 0; i < SP_INTC_NR_GROUPS; i++) {
> + /* all mask */
> + writel_relaxed(0, REG_INTR_MASK + i * 4);
> + /* all edge */
> + writel_relaxed(~0, REG_INTR_TYPE + i * 4);
> + /* all high-active */
> + writel_relaxed(0, REG_INTR_POLARITY + i * 4);
> + /* all EXT_INT0 */
> + writel_relaxed(~0, REG_INTR_PRIORITY + i * 4);
> + /* all clear */
> + writel_relaxed(~0, REG_INTR_CLEAR + i * 4);
> + }
> +
> + sp_intc.domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, SP_INTC_NR_IRQS,
> + &sp_intc_dm_ops, &sp_intc);
> + if (!sp_intc.domain) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_unmap1;
> + }
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_init(&sp_intc.lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +out_unmap1:
> + iounmap(sp_intc.g1);
> +out_unmap0:
> + iounmap(sp_intc.g0);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(sp_intc, "sunplus,sp7021-intc", sp_intc_init_dt);
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Qin Jian <qinjian@cqplus1.com>
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, p.zabel@pengutronix.de,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, broonie@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
wells.lu@sunplus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/10] irqchip: Add Sunplus SP7021 interrupt controller driver
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 09:02:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r1ao23fp.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e88ea4cf28ba69a41f6d1b4dd4128b82a6095c29.1638515726.git.qinjian@cqplus1.com>
On Fri, 03 Dec 2021 07:34:25 +0000,
Qin Jian <qinjian@cqplus1.com> wrote:
>
> Add interrupt controller driver for Sunplus SP7021 SoC.
>
> This is the interrupt controller in P-chip which collects all interrupt
> sources in P-chip and routes them to parent interrupt controller in C-chip.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qin Jian <qinjian@cqplus1.com>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 9 +
> drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/irqchip/irq-sp7021-intc.c | 284 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 295 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-sp7021-intc.c
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 6b3bbe021..febbd97bf 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -2665,6 +2665,7 @@ F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunplus,sp7021-clkc.yaml
> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sunplus,sp7021-intc.yaml
> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/sunplus,reset.yaml
> F: drivers/clk/clk-sp7021.c
> +F: drivers/irqchip/irq-sp7021-intc.c
> F: drivers/reset/reset-sunplus.c
> F: include/dt-bindings/clock/sp-sp7021.h
> F: include/dt-bindings/reset/sp-sp7021.h
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> index aca7b595c..b9429b8d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> @@ -602,4 +602,13 @@ config APPLE_AIC
> Support for the Apple Interrupt Controller found on Apple Silicon SoCs,
> such as the M1.
>
> +config SUNPLUS_SP7021_INTC
> + bool "Sunplus SP7021 interrupt controller"
> + help
> + Support for the Sunplus SP7021 Interrupt Controller IP core.
> + SP7021 SoC has 2 Chips: C-Chip & P-Chip. This is used as a
> + chained controller, routing all interrupt source in P-Chip to
> + the primary controller on C-Chip.
> + This is selected automatically by platform config.
> +
> endmenu
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> index f88cbf36a..75411f654 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> @@ -116,3 +116,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_REALTEK_RTL) += irq-realtek-rtl.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_WPCM450_AIC) += irq-wpcm450-aic.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_IRQ_IDT3243X) += irq-idt3243x.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_APPLE_AIC) += irq-apple-aic.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SUNPLUS_SP7021_INTC) += irq-sp7021-intc.o
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sp7021-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sp7021-intc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..beabc64d5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sp7021-intc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,284 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) Sunplus Technology Co., Ltd.
> + * All rights reserved.
> + */
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +
> +#define SP_INTC_HWIRQ_MIN 0
> +#define SP_INTC_HWIRQ_MAX 223
> +
> +#define SP_INTC_NR_IRQS (SP_INTC_HWIRQ_MAX - SP_INTC_HWIRQ_MIN + 1)
> +#define SP_INTC_NR_GROUPS DIV_ROUND_UP(SP_INTC_NR_IRQS, 32)
> +#define SP_INTC_REG_SIZE (SP_INTC_NR_GROUPS * 4)
> +
> +/* REG_GROUP_0 regs */
> +#define REG_INTR_TYPE (sp_intc.g0)
> +#define REG_INTR_POLARITY (REG_INTR_TYPE + SP_INTC_REG_SIZE)
> +#define REG_INTR_PRIORITY (REG_INTR_POLARITY + SP_INTC_REG_SIZE)
> +#define REG_INTR_MASK (REG_INTR_PRIORITY + SP_INTC_REG_SIZE)
> +
> +/* REG_GROUP_1 regs */
> +#define REG_INTR_CLEAR (sp_intc.g1)
> +#define REG_MASKED_EXT1 (REG_INTR_CLEAR + SP_INTC_REG_SIZE)
> +#define REG_MASKED_EXT0 (REG_MASKED_EXT1 + SP_INTC_REG_SIZE)
> +#define REG_INTR_GROUP (REG_INTR_CLEAR + 31 * 4)
> +
> +#define GROUP_MASK (BIT(SP_INTC_NR_GROUPS) - 1)
> +#define GROUP_SHIFT_EXT1 (0)
> +#define GROUP_SHIFT_EXT0 (8)
> +
> +/*
> + * When GPIO_INT0~7 set to edge trigger, doesn't work properly.
> + * WORKAROUND: change it to level trigger, and toggle the polarity
> + * at ACK/Handler to make the HW work.
> + */
> +#define GPIO_INT0_HWIRQ 120
> +#define GPIO_INT7_HWIRQ 127
> +#define IS_GPIO_INT(irq) \
> +({ \
> + u32 i = irq; \
> + (i >= GPIO_INT0_HWIRQ) && (i <= GPIO_INT7_HWIRQ); \
> +})
> +
> +/* index of states */
> +enum {
> + _IS_EDGE = 0,
> + _IS_LOW,
> + _IS_ACTIVE
> +};
> +
> +#define STATE_BIT(irq, idx) (((irq) - GPIO_INT0_HWIRQ) * 3 + (idx))
> +#define ASSIGN_STATE(irq, idx, v) assign_bit(STATE_BIT(irq, idx), sp_intc.states, v)
> +#define TEST_STATE(irq, idx) test_bit(STATE_BIT(irq, idx), sp_intc.states)
> +
> +static struct sp_intctl {
> + /*
> + * REG_GROUP_0: include type/polarity/priority/mask regs.
> + * REG_GROUP_1: include clear/masked_ext0/masked_ext1/group regs.
> + */
> + void __iomem *g0; // REG_GROUP_0 base
> + void __iomem *g1; // REG_GROUP_1 base
> +
> + struct irq_domain *domain;
> + raw_spinlock_t lock;
> +
> + /*
> + * store GPIO_INT states
> + * each interrupt has 3 states: is_edge, is_low, is_active
> + */
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(states, (GPIO_INT7_HWIRQ - GPIO_INT0_HWIRQ + 1) * 3);
> +} sp_intc;
> +
> +static struct irq_chip sp_intc_chip;
> +
> +static void sp_intc_assign_bit(u32 hwirq, void __iomem *base, bool value)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sp_intc.lock, flags);
> + __assign_bit(hwirq, base, value);
__assign_bit() on an MMIO mapping? No. Why do you think we have
separate MMIO accessors?
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sp_intc.lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static void sp_intc_ack_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + u32 hwirq = d->hwirq;
> +
> + if (unlikely(IS_GPIO_INT(hwirq) && TEST_STATE(hwirq, _IS_EDGE))) { // WORKAROUND
> + sp_intc_assign_bit(hwirq, REG_INTR_POLARITY, !TEST_STATE(hwirq, _IS_LOW));
> + ASSIGN_STATE(hwirq, _IS_ACTIVE, true);
> + }
> +
> + sp_intc_assign_bit(hwirq, REG_INTR_CLEAR, 1);
> +}
> +
> +static void sp_intc_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + sp_intc_assign_bit(d->hwirq, REG_INTR_MASK, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void sp_intc_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + sp_intc_assign_bit(d->hwirq, REG_INTR_MASK, 1);
> +}
> +
> +static int sp_intc_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> +{
> + u32 hwirq = d->hwirq;
> + bool is_edge = !(type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_MASK);
> + bool is_low = (type == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW || type == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING);
> +
> + irq_set_handler_locked(d, is_edge ? handle_edge_irq : handle_level_irq);
> +
> + if (unlikely(IS_GPIO_INT(hwirq) && is_edge)) { // WORKAROUND
> + /* store states */
> + ASSIGN_STATE(hwirq, _IS_EDGE, is_edge);
> + ASSIGN_STATE(hwirq, _IS_LOW, is_low);
> + ASSIGN_STATE(hwirq, _IS_ACTIVE, false);
> + /* change to level */
> + is_edge = false;
> + }
> +
> + sp_intc_assign_bit(hwirq, REG_INTR_TYPE, is_edge);
> + sp_intc_assign_bit(hwirq, REG_INTR_POLARITY, is_low);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sp_intc_get_ext_irq(int ext_num)
> +{
> + void __iomem *base = ext_num ? REG_MASKED_EXT1 : REG_MASKED_EXT0;
> + u32 shift = ext_num ? GROUP_SHIFT_EXT1 : GROUP_SHIFT_EXT0;
> + u32 groups;
> + u32 pending_group;
> + u32 group;
> + u32 pending_irq;
> +
> + groups = readl_relaxed(REG_INTR_GROUP);
> + pending_group = (groups >> shift) & GROUP_MASK;
> + if (!pending_group)
> + return -1;
> +
> + group = fls(pending_group) - 1;
> + pending_irq = readl_relaxed(base + group * 4);
> + if (!pending_irq)
> + return -1;
> +
> + return (group * 32) + fls(pending_irq) - 1;
> +}
> +
> +static void sp_intc_handle_ext_cascaded(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> + int ext_num = (int)irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> + int hwirq;
> +
> + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> +
> + while ((hwirq = sp_intc_get_ext_irq(ext_num)) >= 0) {
> + if (unlikely(IS_GPIO_INT(hwirq) && TEST_STATE(hwirq, _IS_ACTIVE))) { // WORKAROUND
> + ASSIGN_STATE(hwirq, _IS_ACTIVE, false);
> + sp_intc_assign_bit(hwirq, REG_INTR_POLARITY, TEST_STATE(hwirq, _IS_LOW));
> + } else {
> + generic_handle_domain_irq(sp_intc.domain, hwirq);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +static int sp_intc_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static struct irq_chip sp_intc_chip = {
> + .name = "sp_intc",
> + .irq_ack = sp_intc_ack_irq,
> + .irq_mask = sp_intc_mask_irq,
> + .irq_unmask = sp_intc_unmask_irq,
> + .irq_set_type = sp_intc_set_type,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + .irq_set_affinity = sp_intc_set_affinity,
> +#endif
> +};
> +
> +static int sp_intc_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *domain,
> + unsigned int irq, irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
> +{
> + irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &sp_intc_chip, handle_level_irq);
> + irq_set_chip_data(irq, &sp_intc_chip);
> + irq_set_noprobe(irq);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_domain_ops sp_intc_dm_ops = {
> + .xlate = irq_domain_xlate_twocell,
> + .map = sp_intc_irq_domain_map,
> +};
> +
> +static int sp_intc_irq_map(struct device_node *node, int i)
> +{
> + unsigned int irq;
> +
> + irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, i);
> + if (!irq)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(irq, sp_intc_handle_ext_cascaded, (void *)i);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void sp_intc_set_ext(u32 hwirq, int ext_num)
> +{
> + sp_intc_assign_bit(hwirq, REG_INTR_PRIORITY, !ext_num);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sp_intc_set_ext);
No way. We don't export random symbols without a good justification,
and you didn't give any.
> +
> +int __init sp_intc_init_dt(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
This should be static.
> +{
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + sp_intc.g0 = of_iomap(node, 0);
> + if (!sp_intc.g0)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
> + sp_intc.g1 = of_iomap(node, 1);
> + if (!sp_intc.g1) {
> + ret = -ENXIO;
> + goto out_unmap0;
> + }
> +
> + ret = sp_intc_irq_map(node, 0); // EXT_INT0
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_unmap1;
> +
> + ret = sp_intc_irq_map(node, 1); // EXT_INT1
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_unmap1;
> +
> + /* initial regs */
> + for (i = 0; i < SP_INTC_NR_GROUPS; i++) {
> + /* all mask */
> + writel_relaxed(0, REG_INTR_MASK + i * 4);
> + /* all edge */
> + writel_relaxed(~0, REG_INTR_TYPE + i * 4);
> + /* all high-active */
> + writel_relaxed(0, REG_INTR_POLARITY + i * 4);
> + /* all EXT_INT0 */
> + writel_relaxed(~0, REG_INTR_PRIORITY + i * 4);
> + /* all clear */
> + writel_relaxed(~0, REG_INTR_CLEAR + i * 4);
> + }
> +
> + sp_intc.domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, SP_INTC_NR_IRQS,
> + &sp_intc_dm_ops, &sp_intc);
> + if (!sp_intc.domain) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_unmap1;
> + }
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_init(&sp_intc.lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +out_unmap1:
> + iounmap(sp_intc.g1);
> +out_unmap0:
> + iounmap(sp_intc.g0);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(sp_intc, "sunplus,sp7021-intc", sp_intc_init_dt);
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-07 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-03 7:34 [PATCH v5 00/10] Add Sunplus SP7021 SoC Support Qin Jian
2021-12-03 7:34 ` Qin Jian
2021-12-03 7:34 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add Sunplus Qin Jian
2021-12-03 7:34 ` Qin Jian
2021-12-03 7:34 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] dt-bindings: arm: sunplus: Add bindings for Sunplus SP7021 SoC boards Qin Jian
2021-12-03 7:34 ` Qin Jian
2021-12-03 7:34 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] dt-bindings: reset: Add bindings for SP7021 reset driver Qin Jian
2021-12-03 7:34 ` Qin Jian
2021-12-03 7:34 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] reset: Add Sunplus " Qin Jian
2021-12-03 7:34 ` Qin Jian
2021-12-07 8:35 ` Philipp Zabel
2021-12-07 8:35 ` Philipp Zabel
2021-12-03 7:34 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] dt-bindings: clock: Add bindings for SP7021 clock driver Qin Jian
2021-12-03 7:34 ` Qin Jian
2021-12-16 6:43 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-12-16 6:43 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-12-03 7:34 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] clk: Add Sunplus " Qin Jian
2021-12-03 7:34 ` Qin Jian
2021-12-03 16:09 ` kernel test robot
2021-12-03 16:09 ` kernel test robot
2021-12-16 6:42 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-12-16 6:42 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-12-03 7:34 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add bindings for SP7021 interrupt controller Qin Jian
2021-12-03 7:34 ` Qin Jian
2021-12-03 7:34 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] irqchip: Add Sunplus SP7021 interrupt controller driver Qin Jian
2021-12-03 7:34 ` Qin Jian
2021-12-03 17:41 ` kernel test robot
2021-12-03 17:41 ` kernel test robot
2021-12-03 17:41 ` kernel test robot
2021-12-03 17:41 ` kernel test robot
2021-12-03 17:41 ` kernel test robot
2021-12-03 18:01 ` kernel test robot
2021-12-03 18:01 ` kernel test robot
2021-12-07 9:02 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-12-07 9:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-08 7:15 ` qinjian[覃健]
2021-12-08 7:15 ` qinjian[覃健]
2021-12-08 7:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-08 7:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-08 9:28 ` qinjian[覃健]
2021-12-08 16:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-08 16:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-03 7:34 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] ARM: sunplus: Add initial support for Sunplus SP7021 SoC Qin Jian
2021-12-03 7:34 ` Qin Jian
2021-12-03 12:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-03 12:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-07 7:21 ` qinjian[覃健]
2021-12-07 7:21 ` qinjian[覃健]
2021-12-07 9:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-07 9:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-09 8:49 ` qinjian[覃健]
2021-12-09 9:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-09 9:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-09 10:12 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-12-09 10:12 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-12-03 7:34 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] ARM: sp7021_defconfig: Add Sunplus SP7021 defconfig Qin Jian
2021-12-03 7:34 ` Qin Jian
2021-12-03 12:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-03 12:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r1ao23fp.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=qinjian@cqplus1.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wells.lu@sunplus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.