All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>,
	make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath10k: Re-enable TXQs for all devices
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 23:40:12 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87shdjpnlf.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f5540404-f2e0-203a-ee75-daf357f29547@nbd.name>

Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name> writes:

> On 2017-11-10 01:48, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Commit 4ca1807815aa6801aaced7fdefa9edacc2521767 disables the use of the
>> mac80211 TXQs for some devices because of a theoretical throughput
>> regression. The original regression report[1] was related to fq_codel
>> qdisc drop performance, which was fixed in
>> 9d18562a227874289fda8ca5d117d8f503f1dcca. Since then, we have not seen
>> the TXQ-related regression, so it should be safe to re-enable TXQs.
> That commit is unrelated to the fq/codel implementations in mac80211,
> since mac80211 with txq does not use qdisc.

Yup. Which is why it's odd that the initial bug report referred to this;
that would indicate that the regression had nothing to do with TXQs in
the first place, and we could have merged this ages ago?

-Toke

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>,
	make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath10k: Re-enable TXQs for all devices
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 23:40:12 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87shdjpnlf.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f5540404-f2e0-203a-ee75-daf357f29547@nbd.name>

Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name> writes:

> On 2017-11-10 01:48, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote:
>> Commit 4ca1807815aa6801aaced7fdefa9edacc2521767 disables the use of the
>> mac80211 TXQs for some devices because of a theoretical throughput
>> regression. The original regression report[1] was related to fq_codel
>> qdisc drop performance, which was fixed in
>> 9d18562a227874289fda8ca5d117d8f503f1dcca. Since then, we have not seen
>> the TXQ-related regression, so it should be safe to re-enable TXQs.
> That commit is unrelated to the fq/codel implementations in mac80211,
> since mac80211 with txq does not use qdisc.

Yup. Which is why it's odd that the initial bug report referred to this;
that would indicate that the regression had nothing to do with TXQs in
the first place, and we could have merged this ages ago?

-Toke

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-12 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-10  0:48 [PATCH v2] ath10k: Re-enable TXQs for all devices Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2017-11-10  0:48 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2017-11-11 13:38 ` Felix Fietkau
2017-11-11 13:38   ` Felix Fietkau
2017-11-12 14:40   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2017-11-12 14:40     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2017-12-02 14:14 ` [v2] " Kalle Valo
2017-12-02 14:14   ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87shdjpnlf.fsf@toke.dk \
    --to=toke@toke.dk \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=nbd@nbd.name \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.