Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net] igc: Fix deadlock on module removal

[Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1253 bytes --]

Hi Lukas,

On Mon Apr 15 2024, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 01:02:14PM +0200, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
>> > > I would have been happy to submit a patch myself, I was waiting
>> > > for a Tested-by from Roman or you.
>> >
>> > Perfect. I was wondering why you are not submitting the patch
>> > yourself. Then, please go ahead and submit the patch. Feel free to add
>> > my Tested-by.
>> 
>> Scratch that. I've sent v2 with your SoB. PTAL, because your original
>> code snippet didn't have a SoB.
>> 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240411-igc_led_deadlock-v2-1-b758c0c88b2b@linutronix.de/
>
> I created a patch yesterday, as you've requested, then waited for 0-day
> to crunch through it and report success.  Which it just did, so here's
> my proposal and I guess maintainers now have more than enough options
> to choose from:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/2f1be6b1cf2b3346929b0049f2ac7d7d79acb5c9.1713188539.git.lukas@wunner.de/

Yes. And sorry for being a bit unresponsive, but i was out-of-office for
the last couple of weeks. Anyway, thank you for your help in debugging
this!

Regarding testing, it worked on my test machines and the Intel
maintainers will validate it as well.

Thanks,
Kurt

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 861 bytes --]