From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: "Govindraj.R" <govindraj.raja@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] OMAP2+: mux: Enable wakeup for wakeup enable requested pads
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:57:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tyfi49cs.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lj0u8mrf.fsf@ti.com> (Kevin Hilman's message of "Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:54:44 -0800")
Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> writes:
> "Govindraj.R" <govindraj.raja@ti.com> writes:
[...]
>> /* Assumes the calling function takes care of locking */
>> void omap_hwmod_mux(struct omap_hwmod_mux_info *hmux, u8 state)
>> {
>> @@ -342,6 +365,9 @@ void omap_hwmod_mux(struct omap_hwmod_mux_info *hmux, u8 state)
>> break;
>> flags &= ~OMAP_DEVICE_PAD_ENABLED;
>> val = pad->idle;
>> + if (flags & OMAP_DEVICE_PAD_WAKEUP)
>> + val |= OMAP_WAKEUP_EN;
>> +
>
> Is this needed on every idle transition?
>
> You're currently setting it on every idle transition, but never clearing
> it. If it is to be a one-time thing, then move it to the early init of
> the mux.
Just to clarify...
So as soon as the hwmod is first idled, IO-ring wakeups are enabled for
any pads that have OMAP_DEVICE_PAD_WAKEUP.
The problem here (compared with behavior of existing code) is that there
is no provision for disabling IO-ring wakeups.
For example, with current code, you can disable wakeups from userspace
using the sysfs control file /sys/devices/.../power/wakeup, whose value
can be checked using device_may_wakeup(), like current
mach-omap2/serial.c code does.
With this patch, IO-ring wakeups are always enabled, and never disabled.
Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] OMAP2+: mux: Enable wakeup for wakeup enable requested pads
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:57:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tyfi49cs.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lj0u8mrf.fsf@ti.com> (Kevin Hilman's message of "Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:54:44 -0800")
Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> writes:
> "Govindraj.R" <govindraj.raja@ti.com> writes:
[...]
>> /* Assumes the calling function takes care of locking */
>> void omap_hwmod_mux(struct omap_hwmod_mux_info *hmux, u8 state)
>> {
>> @@ -342,6 +365,9 @@ void omap_hwmod_mux(struct omap_hwmod_mux_info *hmux, u8 state)
>> break;
>> flags &= ~OMAP_DEVICE_PAD_ENABLED;
>> val = pad->idle;
>> + if (flags & OMAP_DEVICE_PAD_WAKEUP)
>> + val |= OMAP_WAKEUP_EN;
>> +
>
> Is this needed on every idle transition?
>
> You're currently setting it on every idle transition, but never clearing
> it. If it is to be a one-time thing, then move it to the early init of
> the mux.
Just to clarify...
So as soon as the hwmod is first idled, IO-ring wakeups are enabled for
any pads that have OMAP_DEVICE_PAD_WAKEUP.
The problem here (compared with behavior of existing code) is that there
is no provision for disabling IO-ring wakeups.
For example, with current code, you can disable wakeups from userspace
using the sysfs control file /sys/devices/.../power/wakeup, whose value
can be checked using device_may_wakeup(), like current
mach-omap2/serial.c code does.
With this patch, IO-ring wakeups are always enabled, and never disabled.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-05 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-02 11:12 [PATCH 2/7] OMAP2+: mux: Enable wakeup for wakeup enable requested pads Govindraj.R
2011-03-02 11:12 ` Govindraj.R
2011-03-04 23:54 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-03-04 23:54 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-03-05 1:57 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-03-05 1:57 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-03-08 11:44 ` Govindraj
2011-03-08 11:44 ` Govindraj
2011-03-08 17:26 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-03-08 17:26 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-03-08 18:31 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-03-08 18:31 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-03-08 19:16 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-03-08 19:16 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-03-08 19:21 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-03-08 19:21 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-03-09 12:06 ` Govindraj
2011-03-09 12:06 ` Govindraj
2011-03-08 12:19 ` Govindraj
2011-03-08 12:19 ` Govindraj
2011-03-09 1:14 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-03-09 1:14 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-03-09 14:45 ` Govindraj
2011-03-09 14:45 ` Govindraj
2011-03-05 1:27 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-03-05 1:27 ` Kevin Hilman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-02-28 14:39 [PATCH 0/7] OMAP2+: UART: runtime conversion + cleanup Govindraj.R
2011-02-28 14:39 ` [PATCH 2/7] OMAP2+: mux: Enable wakeup for wakeup enable requested pads Govindraj.R
2011-02-28 14:39 ` Govindraj.R
2011-03-02 4:49 ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-03-02 4:49 ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-03-02 10:40 ` Govindraj
2011-03-02 10:40 ` Govindraj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tyfi49cs.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=govindraj.raja@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.