* [PATCH] Add a multi-process IPC test
@ 2009-04-09 17:46 Dan Smith
[not found] ` <1239299170-14827-1-git-send-email-danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dan Smith @ 2009-04-09 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg
This test forks off several children in various states to ensure that the
IPC namespace information is properly restored after restart.
Cc: orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org
Signed-off-by: Dan Smith <danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
Makefile | 2 +-
tst_ipcshm_multi.c | 266 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 267 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tst_ipcshm_multi.c
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index c847a0c..2da03bb 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ CFLAGS += -g $(WARNS) $(PATHS) $(DEBUG)
PROGS = self ckpt rstr mktree
TESTS= tst_onetask tst_multitask tst_bigmem tst_pipes tst_pipes2 tst_shmem \
- tst_ipcshm tst_ipcmsq
+ tst_ipcshm tst_ipcmsq tst_ipcshm_multi
LDLIBS = -lm
diff --git a/tst_ipcshm_multi.c b/tst_ipcshm_multi.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1ef31f7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tst_ipcshm_multi.c
@@ -0,0 +1,266 @@
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <sys/ipc.h>
+#include <sys/shm.h>
+
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <sched.h>
+
+#define OUTFILE "/tmp/cr-test.out"
+#define SEG_SIZE (20 * 4096)
+#define DELAY 20
+
+int attach(unsigned char **seg, int num)
+{
+ int id;
+
+ id = shmget(123, SEG_SIZE, 0700|IPC_EXCL);
+ if (id < 0) {
+ printf("[CHILD %i] shmget: %m\n", num);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ *seg = shmat(id, NULL, 0);
+ if (!*seg) {
+ printf("[CHILD %i] shmat: %m\n", num);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ printf("[CHILD %i] Attached\n", num);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int validate(unsigned char *seg, int num)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 1; i < SEG_SIZE; i++) {
+ if (seg[i] != (unsigned char)(i % 256)) {
+ printf("[CHILD %i] Mismatch at %hhu: %hhu\n",
+ num, i, seg[i]);
+ return -1;
+ }
+ }
+
+ printf("[CHILD %i] Validated\n", num);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void track(unsigned char *seg, int num)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
+ printf("[CHILD %i] Seg[0]: %i\n", num, seg[0]);
+ sleep(1);
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * Attach to the shared segment *before* the checkpoint and then track
+ * the changing seg[0] position afterwards.
+ */
+int child1(void)
+{
+ unsigned char *seg;
+ int num = 1;
+
+ printf("[CHILD %i] Running\n", num);
+
+ sleep(1); /* Allow master to finish initializing the array */
+
+ if (attach(&seg, num))
+ return -1;
+
+ if (validate(seg, num))
+ return -1;
+
+ sleep(DELAY - 1); /* Wait until after the checkpoint */
+
+ track(seg, num);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Attempt to attach to the shared segment *after* the checkpoint to
+ * verify that things are hooked up properly after restart by tracking
+ * seg[0].
+ */
+int child2(void)
+{
+ unsigned char *seg;
+ int num = 2;
+
+ printf("[CHILD %i] Running\n", num);
+
+ sleep(DELAY); /* Wait until after the checkpoint */
+
+ if (attach(&seg, num))
+ return -1;
+
+ if (validate(seg, num))
+ return -1;
+
+ track(seg, num);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int child4(void);
+
+/*
+ * Detach from the parent's IPC namespace and verify that:
+ * 1. We can't attach to the parent's segment
+ * 2. We can create our own of the same ID without conflict
+ * 3. We do not see the parent's changing seg[0] after restart
+ */
+int child3(void)
+{
+ unsigned char *seg;
+ int num = 3;
+
+ if (unshare(CLONE_NEWIPC) != 0) {
+ printf("[CHILD %i] unshare(CLONE_NEWIPC): %m", num);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ if (fork() == 0)
+ return child4();
+
+ printf("[CHILD %i] Running (new IPC NS)\n", num);
+
+ printf("[CHILD %i] Attempting parent attach (should fail)\n", num);
+ if (!attach(&seg, num)) {
+ printf("[CHILD %i] Attached to parent's IPC!\n", num);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ if (shmget(123, SEG_SIZE, 0700|IPC_CREAT|IPC_EXCL) < 0) {
+ printf("[CHILD %i] Failed to create shm in namespace: %m\n",
+ num);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ if (attach(&seg, num))
+ return -1;
+
+ seg[0] = 123;
+
+ sleep(DELAY); /* Wait until after checkpoint, then attach */
+
+ track(seg, num);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * This child is forked from child3 under the new IPC namespace.
+ * Verify that post-restart, we do not see the changing seg[0]
+ */
+int child4(void)
+{
+ unsigned char *seg;
+ int num = 4;
+
+ printf("[CHILD %i] Running (new IPC NS)\n", num);
+
+ sleep(DELAY); /* Wait past my parent creating the IPC */
+
+ if (attach(&seg, num))
+ return -1;
+
+ track(seg, num);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void shm_destroy(void)
+{
+ int id;
+
+ id = shmget(123, SEG_SIZE, 0700);
+ if (id < 0)
+ return;
+
+ if (shmctl(id, IPC_RMID, NULL) == 0)
+ printf("Deleted SHM %i\n", id);
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+ int id;
+ unsigned char *seg;
+ int i;
+ int pid1, pid2, pid3;
+#ifndef TEST
+ FILE *file;
+
+ close(0);
+ close(1);
+ close(2);
+
+ unlink(OUTFILE);
+ file = fopen(OUTFILE, "w+");
+ if (!file) {
+ perror("open");
+ exit(1);
+ }
+ if (dup2(0,2) < 0) {
+ perror("dup2");
+ exit(2);
+ }
+ stdout = file;
+ setlinebuf(file);
+#endif
+ shm_destroy();
+
+ pid1 = fork();
+ if (pid1 == 0)
+ return child1();
+
+ pid2 = fork();
+ if (pid2 == 0)
+ return child2();
+
+ pid3 = fork();
+ if (pid3 == 0)
+ return child3();
+
+ id = shmget(123, SEG_SIZE, 0700|IPC_CREAT|IPC_EXCL);
+ if (id < 0) {
+ perror("shmget");
+ exit(1);
+ }
+
+ seg = (unsigned char *) shmat(id, NULL, 0);
+ if(seg == ((void *) -1)) {
+ perror("shmat");
+ exit(1);
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < SEG_SIZE; i++)
+ seg[i] = i;
+
+ printf("[MSTER] Waiting for checkpoint\n");
+ sleep(DELAY);
+ printf("[MSTER] Woke\n");
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 15; i++) {
+ seg[0] = i;
+ sleep(1);
+ }
+
+ if (shmdt(seg) < 0)
+ perror("shmdt");
+
+ shm_destroy();
+
+ printf("[MSTER] Completed\n");
+
+ return 0;
+}
--
1.6.0.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Add a multi-process IPC test
[not found] ` <1239299170-14827-1-git-send-email-danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-04-09 17:51 ` Dan Smith
2009-04-09 18:51 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-04-12 0:42 ` Oren Laadan
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dan Smith @ 2009-04-09 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg
DS> This test forks off several children in various states to ensure
DS> that the IPC namespace information is properly restored after
DS> restart.
I should have mentioned that this test behaves as expected with the
latest IPC patches from Oren. If I run it and wait about ten seconds
to checkpoint it, on restart everything gets hooked back up properly.
--
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
email: danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Add a multi-process IPC test
[not found] ` <1239299170-14827-1-git-send-email-danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-09 17:51 ` Dan Smith
@ 2009-04-09 18:51 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20090409185159.GA32610-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-12 0:42 ` Oren Laadan
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Serge E. Hallyn @ 2009-04-09 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Smith; +Cc: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg
Quoting Dan Smith (danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org):
> This test forks off several children in various states to ensure that the
> IPC namespace information is properly restored after restart.
Thanks, Dan. I've got a few other simple c/r tests collected which I
want to automate in the next few days so one can just run 'check_cr' and
get a list of pass/fails. I'll also add some tests which Nathan had
written for IPC. Hmm, I suppose the easiest thing for now will be to
put a tarball on lxc.sf.net.
-serge
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Add a multi-process IPC test
[not found] ` <20090409185159.GA32610-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-04-09 18:58 ` Dan Smith
2009-04-11 23:48 ` Oren Laadan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dan Smith @ 2009-04-09 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Serge E. Hallyn; +Cc: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg
SH> Thanks, Dan. I've got a few other simple c/r tests collected
SH> which I want to automate in the next few days so one can just run
SH> 'check_cr' and get a list of pass/fails. I'll also add some tests
SH> which Nathan had written for IPC. Hmm, I suppose the easiest
SH> thing for now will be to put a tarball on lxc.sf.net.
Okay. I should probably add a little more logic to make this test
validate the result (instead of requiring an eye-parse of the log) so
it can be automated.
--
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
email: danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Add a multi-process IPC test
[not found] ` <20090409185159.GA32610-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-09 18:58 ` Dan Smith
@ 2009-04-11 23:48 ` Oren Laadan
[not found] ` <49E12C5F.5020209-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Oren Laadan @ 2009-04-11 23:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Serge E. Hallyn; +Cc: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg, Dan Smith
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Dan Smith (danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org):
>> This test forks off several children in various states to ensure that the
>> IPC namespace information is properly restored after restart.
>
> Thanks, Dan. I've got a few other simple c/r tests collected which I
> want to automate in the next few days so one can just run 'check_cr' and
> get a list of pass/fails. I'll also add some tests which Nathan had
> written for IPC. Hmm, I suppose the easiest thing for now will be to
> put a tarball on lxc.sf.net.
I include the c/r tests with the c/r userland tools (ckpt, mktree etc).
That's a natural repository to collect/hold them.
Oren.
>
> -serge
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> Containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Add a multi-process IPC test
[not found] ` <1239299170-14827-1-git-send-email-danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-09 17:51 ` Dan Smith
2009-04-09 18:51 ` Serge E. Hallyn
@ 2009-04-12 0:42 ` Oren Laadan
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Oren Laadan @ 2009-04-12 0:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Smith; +Cc: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg
Thanks, added to user-cr.git for next version.
Oren.
Dan Smith wrote:
> This test forks off several children in various states to ensure that the
> IPC namespace information is properly restored after restart.
>
> Cc: orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org
> Signed-off-by: Dan Smith <danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> Makefile | 2 +-
> tst_ipcshm_multi.c | 266 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 267 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tst_ipcshm_multi.c
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index c847a0c..2da03bb 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ CFLAGS += -g $(WARNS) $(PATHS) $(DEBUG)
>
> PROGS = self ckpt rstr mktree
> TESTS= tst_onetask tst_multitask tst_bigmem tst_pipes tst_pipes2 tst_shmem \
> - tst_ipcshm tst_ipcmsq
> + tst_ipcshm tst_ipcmsq tst_ipcshm_multi
>
> LDLIBS = -lm
>
> diff --git a/tst_ipcshm_multi.c b/tst_ipcshm_multi.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..1ef31f7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tst_ipcshm_multi.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,266 @@
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <errno.h>
> +#include <sys/ipc.h>
> +#include <sys/shm.h>
> +
> +#include <linux/sched.h>
> +#include <sched.h>
> +
> +#define OUTFILE "/tmp/cr-test.out"
> +#define SEG_SIZE (20 * 4096)
> +#define DELAY 20
> +
> +int attach(unsigned char **seg, int num)
> +{
> + int id;
> +
> + id = shmget(123, SEG_SIZE, 0700|IPC_EXCL);
> + if (id < 0) {
> + printf("[CHILD %i] shmget: %m\n", num);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + *seg = shmat(id, NULL, 0);
> + if (!*seg) {
> + printf("[CHILD %i] shmat: %m\n", num);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + printf("[CHILD %i] Attached\n", num);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int validate(unsigned char *seg, int num)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 1; i < SEG_SIZE; i++) {
> + if (seg[i] != (unsigned char)(i % 256)) {
> + printf("[CHILD %i] Mismatch at %hhu: %hhu\n",
> + num, i, seg[i]);
> + return -1;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + printf("[CHILD %i] Validated\n", num);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void track(unsigned char *seg, int num)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
> + printf("[CHILD %i] Seg[0]: %i\n", num, seg[0]);
> + sleep(1);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Attach to the shared segment *before* the checkpoint and then track
> + * the changing seg[0] position afterwards.
> + */
> +int child1(void)
> +{
> + unsigned char *seg;
> + int num = 1;
> +
> + printf("[CHILD %i] Running\n", num);
> +
> + sleep(1); /* Allow master to finish initializing the array */
> +
> + if (attach(&seg, num))
> + return -1;
> +
> + if (validate(seg, num))
> + return -1;
> +
> + sleep(DELAY - 1); /* Wait until after the checkpoint */
> +
> + track(seg, num);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Attempt to attach to the shared segment *after* the checkpoint to
> + * verify that things are hooked up properly after restart by tracking
> + * seg[0].
> + */
> +int child2(void)
> +{
> + unsigned char *seg;
> + int num = 2;
> +
> + printf("[CHILD %i] Running\n", num);
> +
> + sleep(DELAY); /* Wait until after the checkpoint */
> +
> + if (attach(&seg, num))
> + return -1;
> +
> + if (validate(seg, num))
> + return -1;
> +
> + track(seg, num);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int child4(void);
> +
> +/*
> + * Detach from the parent's IPC namespace and verify that:
> + * 1. We can't attach to the parent's segment
> + * 2. We can create our own of the same ID without conflict
> + * 3. We do not see the parent's changing seg[0] after restart
> + */
> +int child3(void)
> +{
> + unsigned char *seg;
> + int num = 3;
> +
> + if (unshare(CLONE_NEWIPC) != 0) {
> + printf("[CHILD %i] unshare(CLONE_NEWIPC): %m", num);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + if (fork() == 0)
> + return child4();
> +
> + printf("[CHILD %i] Running (new IPC NS)\n", num);
> +
> + printf("[CHILD %i] Attempting parent attach (should fail)\n", num);
> + if (!attach(&seg, num)) {
> + printf("[CHILD %i] Attached to parent's IPC!\n", num);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + if (shmget(123, SEG_SIZE, 0700|IPC_CREAT|IPC_EXCL) < 0) {
> + printf("[CHILD %i] Failed to create shm in namespace: %m\n",
> + num);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + if (attach(&seg, num))
> + return -1;
> +
> + seg[0] = 123;
> +
> + sleep(DELAY); /* Wait until after checkpoint, then attach */
> +
> + track(seg, num);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * This child is forked from child3 under the new IPC namespace.
> + * Verify that post-restart, we do not see the changing seg[0]
> + */
> +int child4(void)
> +{
> + unsigned char *seg;
> + int num = 4;
> +
> + printf("[CHILD %i] Running (new IPC NS)\n", num);
> +
> + sleep(DELAY); /* Wait past my parent creating the IPC */
> +
> + if (attach(&seg, num))
> + return -1;
> +
> + track(seg, num);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void shm_destroy(void)
> +{
> + int id;
> +
> + id = shmget(123, SEG_SIZE, 0700);
> + if (id < 0)
> + return;
> +
> + if (shmctl(id, IPC_RMID, NULL) == 0)
> + printf("Deleted SHM %i\n", id);
> +}
> +
> +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> +{
> + int id;
> + unsigned char *seg;
> + int i;
> + int pid1, pid2, pid3;
> +#ifndef TEST
> + FILE *file;
> +
> + close(0);
> + close(1);
> + close(2);
> +
> + unlink(OUTFILE);
> + file = fopen(OUTFILE, "w+");
> + if (!file) {
> + perror("open");
> + exit(1);
> + }
> + if (dup2(0,2) < 0) {
> + perror("dup2");
> + exit(2);
> + }
> + stdout = file;
> + setlinebuf(file);
> +#endif
> + shm_destroy();
> +
> + pid1 = fork();
> + if (pid1 == 0)
> + return child1();
> +
> + pid2 = fork();
> + if (pid2 == 0)
> + return child2();
> +
> + pid3 = fork();
> + if (pid3 == 0)
> + return child3();
> +
> + id = shmget(123, SEG_SIZE, 0700|IPC_CREAT|IPC_EXCL);
> + if (id < 0) {
> + perror("shmget");
> + exit(1);
> + }
> +
> + seg = (unsigned char *) shmat(id, NULL, 0);
> + if(seg == ((void *) -1)) {
> + perror("shmat");
> + exit(1);
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < SEG_SIZE; i++)
> + seg[i] = i;
> +
> + printf("[MSTER] Waiting for checkpoint\n");
> + sleep(DELAY);
> + printf("[MSTER] Woke\n");
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 15; i++) {
> + seg[0] = i;
> + sleep(1);
> + }
> +
> + if (shmdt(seg) < 0)
> + perror("shmdt");
> +
> + shm_destroy();
> +
> + printf("[MSTER] Completed\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Add a multi-process IPC test
[not found] ` <49E12C5F.5020209-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-04-12 14:20 ` Serge E. Hallyn
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Serge E. Hallyn @ 2009-04-12 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oren Laadan; +Cc: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg, Dan Smith
Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org):
>
>
> Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Dan Smith (danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org):
> >> This test forks off several children in various states to ensure that the
> >> IPC namespace information is properly restored after restart.
> >
> > Thanks, Dan. I've got a few other simple c/r tests collected which I
> > want to automate in the next few days so one can just run 'check_cr' and
> > get a list of pass/fails. I'll also add some tests which Nathan had
> > written for IPC. Hmm, I suppose the easiest thing for now will be to
> > put a tarball on lxc.sf.net.
>
> I include the c/r tests with the c/r userland tools (ckpt, mktree etc).
> That's a natural repository to collect/hold them.
The natural place is ltp :) Meanwhile I wanted to automate a few tests,
but if you wanted to add those to your user-cr tree that'd be great. I
don't actually *want* them on lxc.sf.net, just had nowhere else to put
them.
thanks,
-serge
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-12 14:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-09 17:46 [PATCH] Add a multi-process IPC test Dan Smith
[not found] ` <1239299170-14827-1-git-send-email-danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-09 17:51 ` Dan Smith
2009-04-09 18:51 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20090409185159.GA32610-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-09 18:58 ` Dan Smith
2009-04-11 23:48 ` Oren Laadan
[not found] ` <49E12C5F.5020209-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-12 14:20 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-04-12 0:42 ` Oren Laadan
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.