From: Arnaud Patard (Rtp) <arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Eric Bénard" <eric@eukrea.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/5] sdhci-esdhc-imx: use gpio for write protection and card detection
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:52:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wrks5dgo.fsf@lebrac.rtp-net.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1298379500-27590-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> (Wolfram Sang's message of "Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:58:15 +0100")
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de> writes:
> Hi,
Hi,
>
> Second version of my series, no major changes:
>
> * rephrased warnings
> * collected some tags
> * rebased to mmc/mmc-next as of today
>
> Eric wanted to tested these patches soonish. Thanks to Marc for testing the
> first three already.
Has this been tested on imx51 ? By default (even after applying your
patches), the sdhci has quirk SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION set, so
we're polling.
I've been wondering if it was a good idea to configure for everyone sdhc
host card detect pin as gpio 1 1 or gpio 1 8 on imx51, which would mean
no more polling. What do you think ? Would it be working or it's just a
stupid idea ?
Arnaud
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org (Arnaud Patard (Rtp))
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V2 0/5] sdhci-esdhc-imx: use gpio for write protection and card detection
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:52:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wrks5dgo.fsf@lebrac.rtp-net.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1298379500-27590-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> (Wolfram Sang's message of "Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:58:15 +0100")
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de> writes:
> Hi,
Hi,
>
> Second version of my series, no major changes:
>
> * rephrased warnings
> * collected some tags
> * rebased to mmc/mmc-next as of today
>
> Eric wanted to tested these patches soonish. Thanks to Marc for testing the
> first three already.
Has this been tested on imx51 ? By default (even after applying your
patches), the sdhci has quirk SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION set, so
we're polling.
I've been wondering if it was a good idea to configure for everyone sdhc
host card detect pin as gpio 1 1 or gpio 1 8 on imx51, which would mean
no more polling. What do you think ? Would it be working or it's just a
stupid idea ?
Arnaud
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-22 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-22 12:58 [PATCH V2 0/5] sdhci-esdhc-imx: use gpio for write protection and card detection Wolfram Sang
2011-02-22 12:58 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-02-22 12:58 ` [PATCH 1/5] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: add support for write protect on custom GPIO Wolfram Sang
2011-02-22 12:58 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-02-22 12:58 ` [PATCH 2/5] mmc: sdhci-esdhc: broken card detection is not a default quirk Wolfram Sang
2011-02-22 12:58 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-02-22 12:58 ` [PATCH 3/5] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: add card detect on custom GPIO Wolfram Sang
2011-02-22 12:58 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-02-22 12:58 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm: mach-mx3: pcm043: add write-protect and card-detect for SD1 Wolfram Sang
2011-02-22 12:58 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-02-22 19:26 ` Fabio Estevam
2011-02-22 19:26 ` Fabio Estevam
2011-02-22 19:55 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-02-22 19:55 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-02-22 12:58 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm: mach-mx3: use IMX_GPIO_NR instead of hard-coded values Wolfram Sang
2011-02-22 12:58 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-02-22 13:30 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-02-22 13:30 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-02-22 19:56 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-02-22 19:56 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-02-22 14:52 ` Arnaud Patard [this message]
2011-02-22 14:52 ` [PATCH V2 0/5] sdhci-esdhc-imx: use gpio for write protection and card detection Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
2011-02-22 15:08 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-02-22 15:08 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wrks5dgo.fsf@lebrac.rtp-net.org \
--to=arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org \
--cc=eric@eukrea.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.