From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
To: me@felipebalbi.com
Cc: felipe.balbi@nokia.com, "Gupta, Ajay Kumar" <ajay.gupta@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: usb_nop_xceiv_register() missing when OTG built as modules
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:02:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y6i6zatj.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <558f5bffd42210a777154737d6730232@secure211.sgcpanel.com> (me@felipebalbi.com's message of "Fri\, 05 Mar 2010 13\:54\:04 -0600")
<me@felipebalbi.com> writes:
> On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 09:59:52 -0800, Kevin Hilman
>> It would be my fault if I wrote those board files. ;)
>
> sure, sorry. Maybe I didn't express myself really well.
>
>>> I suggest you keep usb as a module, but keep nop xceiv built-in.
>>
>> Yes, that's the workaround I'm already using, but it is not a fix.
>>
>> This dependency breaks the ability to build a minimal kernel with
>> everything as modules (allmodconfig)
>
> now this is a really good point. Haven't thought that way...
>
>> The nop xceiv needs a way for built-in code to register itself for
>> the cases when no xceiv is built as a module.
>
> when way to do that is not to use usb_nop_xceiv_register() and
> add the platform_device to the board-files. I never really liked
> the whole usb_nop_xceiv_register() hackery. Almost all board-files
> have a list of platform_devices which get added by platform_add_devices()
> anyways, so why not using that ??
>
> to me the usb_nop_xceiv_register() thing is just a lazy way of
> defining platform_devices. Specially one that takes some 3
> lines of code only.
Completely agree. I didn't take the time to look into the USB code to
see if a simple plaform device creation would fix this.
If so, any chance of a patch for OMAP3EVM and 4430SDP?
I'll be happy to test on OMAP3EVM, but don't have a 4430.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-05 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-04 0:09 usb_nop_xceiv_register() missing when OTG built as modules Kevin Hilman
2010-03-04 4:29 ` Gupta, Ajay Kumar
2010-03-04 17:32 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-03-05 3:50 ` Gupta, Ajay Kumar
2010-03-05 9:04 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-03-05 17:59 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-03-05 19:54 ` me
2010-03-05 22:02 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2010-05-22 23:53 ` Amit Kucheria
2010-05-24 7:07 ` Gupta, Ajay Kumar
2010-05-26 6:03 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-05-26 6:20 ` Gupta, Ajay Kumar
2010-05-26 6:53 ` Gupta, Ajay Kumar
2010-05-26 6:02 ` Felipe Balbi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y6i6zatj.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
--to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=ajay.gupta@ti.com \
--cc=felipe.balbi@nokia.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@felipebalbi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.