Reiserfs, highquality meds source, low rates

Reiserfs, highquality meds source, low rates

[Grosbeak E. Collating]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 671 bytes --]

Ciao, baby! :)
Solvency is maintained by means of a national debt, on the principle, ''If you will not lend me the money, how can I pay you?
The narrative impulse is always with us we couldn't imagine ourselves through a day without it.

Reiserfs, newest medications, low rates
http://filiopietistic.rx-plus.net/?dcent unipod
This country has come to feel the same when Congress is in session as when the baby gets hold of a hammer.
If Jesus Christ be God and died for me, then no sacrifice can be too great for me to make for Him.
Let your best be for your friend...
Life does not require us to make good it asks only that we give our best at each level of experience.


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1139 bytes --]

Re: Reiserfs, highquality meds source, low rates

[Alexander Lyamin]

i am just not sure how to kill THIS messages which look so....
they dont look like spam, even to me upon first look.

can someone get some medications that will cure those spammers
(8 just not enough, rack on some more ammo, and dont be shy
to call for airstrike)

Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 06:52:28PM -0700, Grosbeak E. Collating wrote:
> Ciao, baby! :)
> Solvency is maintained by means of a national debt, on the principle, ''If you will not lend me the money, how can I pay you?
> The narrative impulse is always with us we couldn't imagine ourselves through a day without it.
> 
> Reiserfs, newest medications, low rates
> http://filiopietistic.rx-plus.net/?dcent unipod
> This country has come to feel the same when Congress is in session as when the baby gets hold of a hammer.
> If Jesus Christ be God and died for me, then no sacrifice can be too great for me to make for Him.
> Let your best be for your friend...


> Life does not require us to make good it asks only that we give our best at each level of experience.
nice saying indeed ;)
-- 
"the liberation loophole will make it clear.."
lex lyamin

Re: Reiserfs, highquality meds source, low rates

[Cami]

> i am just not sure how to kill THIS messages which look so....
> they dont look like spam, even to me upon first look.

If you were using SpamAssasin, you wouldn't get these..

> can someone get some medications that will cure those spammers
> (8 just not enough, rack on some more ammo, and dont be shy
> to call for airstrike)
 >
>>Ciao, baby! :)
>>Solvency is maintained by means of a national debt, on the principle, ''If you will not lend me the money, how can I pay you?
>>The narrative impulse is always with us we couldn't imagine ourselves through a day without it.
>>
>>Reiserfs, newest medications, low rates
>>http://filiopietistic.rx-plus.net/?dcent unipod
>>This country has come to feel the same when Congress is in session as when the baby gets hold of a hammer.
>>If Jesus Christ be God and died for me, then no sacrifice can be too great for me to make for Him.
>>Let your best be for your friend...
> 
> 
> 
>>Life does not require us to make good it asks only that we give our best at each level of experience.
> 
> nice saying indeed ;)

Re: Reiserfs, highquality meds source, low rates

[Toby Dickenson]

On Monday 19 April 2004 12:59, Alexander Lyamin wrote:
> i am just not sure how to kill THIS messages which look so....
> they dont look like spam, even to me upon first look.

You need more software....

For me, spambayes nailed the original message as spam, and your reply 
(helpfully quoting all of the orginal) was classified as ham.

http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/

-- 
Toby Dickenson

Re: Reiserfs, highquality meds source, low rates

[Alexander Lyamin]

Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 02:06:08PM +0200, Cami wrote:
> >i am just not sure how to kill THIS messages which look so....
> >they dont look like spam, even to me upon first look.
> 
> If you were using SpamAssasin, you wouldn't get these..
oh sure :)

would you mind and check the headers ? :)
if we would not use spamassassin we would have 160+ more
(what is actually more then daily traffic in this list)


-- 
"the liberation loophole will make it clear.."
lex lyamin

Re: Reiserfs, highquality meds source, low rates

[Alexander Lyamin]

Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 01:39:08PM +0100, Toby Dickenson wrote:
> On Monday 19 April 2004 12:59, Alexander Lyamin wrote:
> > i am just not sure how to kill THIS messages which look so....
> > they dont look like spam, even to me upon first look.
> 
> You need more software....
> 
> For me, spambayes nailed the original message as spam, and your reply 
> (helpfully quoting all of the orginal) was classified as ham.
> 
> http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/

notice that this particular message had "bayes poisoning" trap in its body ;)
that was actually reason for my complain.



-- 
"the liberation loophole will make it clear.."
lex lyamin

Re: Reiserfs, highquality meds source, low rates

[Cami]

>>>i am just not sure how to kill THIS messages which look so....
>>>they dont look like spam, even to me upon first look.
>>
>>If you were using SpamAssasin, you wouldn't get these..
> 
> oh sure :)
> 
> would you mind and check the headers ? :)

Theres no way for me to tell since my spamassassin
removes already inserted headers and then scans+inserts
its own..

> if we would not use spamassassin we would have 160+ more
> (what is actually more then daily traffic in this list)

What custom rulesets are you using?

Regards,
Cami

Re: Reiserfs, highquality meds source, low rates

[Hendrik Visage]

On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 05:40:32PM +0400, Alexander Lyamin wrote:
> 
> notice that this particular message had "bayes poisoning" trap in its body ;)
> that was actually reason for my complain.

Personally I still have to see such poisoning on DSPAM, but I'll admit
it's not 100% perfect, only about 99.9% ;^)

Hendrik

Re: Reiserfs, highquality meds source, low rates

[Zygo Blaxell]

In article <4083C0B0.6090607@mweb.co.za>, Cami  <camis@mweb.co.za> wrote:
>> i am just not sure how to kill THIS messages which look so....
>> they dont look like spam, even to me upon first look.
>
>If you were using SpamAssasin, you wouldn't get these..

I _am_ using SpamAssassin, and I got this.  

Actually, this has turned into a neat example of how to poison a Bayes filter.

The original spam got flagged on my system like this:

X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,HTML_MESSAGE, 
	RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK,RCVD_IN_RFCI,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.63

So this got through the usual SA rules, none of which give very high
scores, and even the Bayes filter isn't sure.

Then comes your message, with a quote of the original spam:

X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham  
	version=2.63

So...my Bayes filter just auto-trained itself on the contents of the
spam message...as ham.  If I now feed the original spam through SA
again, it gets BAYES_01, and a score of -1.5.  Clearly I'm going to be
receiving a _lot_ of these, at least until I batch them all up and feed
them to sa-learn to retrain the Bayes filter.

Folks, if you want to talk about spam on a (non-spam-related) mailing
list, please please please don't quote it, no matter how interesting it
may be.  Or at least, if you do quote it, be sure to include a sentence
or two that contains gratuitous references to the names of chemicals
often used to mitigate the effects of problems that may arise with men
and the organs they use to procreate.

-- 
Zygo Blaxell (Laptop) <zblaxell@feedme.hungrycats.org>
GPG = D13D 6651 F446 9787 600B AD1E CCF3 6F93 2823 44AD

Re: Reiserfs, highquality meds source, low rates

[Michael James]

On Monday 19 April 2004 23:40, Alexander Lyamin wrote:
> > i am just not sure how to kill THIS messages which look so....
> > they dont look like spam, even to me upon first look.
> > 
>  You need more software....

While Hans doesn't want to block posts by non-subscribers,
 could a non-subscriber return address be verified
 in the same way as a new subscription is?

ie: If a non-subscriber posts; they get back a letter,
 "We recieved this posting to the Reiserfs List,
  if you want it to appear, just hit reply."

From the list software's point of view
 they are actually subscribing, but with delivery supressed.

Mailman can cope with a subscriber suspending delivery, (for holidays etc)
 it would be a case of jiggering the subscription to happen transparently.

Just another slightly different hoop to trip up the spammers.
michaelj

PS: Thanks for you existing labours on this list, it's appreciated.

-- 
Michael James                         michael.james@csiro.au
System Administrator                    voice:  02 6246 5040
CSIRO Bioinformatics Facility             fax:  02 6246 5166

Re: Reiserfs, highquality meds source, low rates

[Cami]

>>>i am just not sure how to kill THIS messages which look so....
>>>they dont look like spam, even to me upon first look.
>>
>>If you were using SpamAssasin, you wouldn't get these..
> 
> 
> I _am_ using SpamAssassin, and I got this.  


#!/bin/sh

cd /etc/mail/spamassassin
wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/99_sare_adult.cf
wget -nd -N 
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/99_sare_biz_market_learn_post25x.cf
wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/99_sare_fraud_post25x.cf
wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/99_sare_random.cf
wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/99_FVGT_Tripwire.cf
wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/99_OBFU_drugs.cf
wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/99_sare_spoof.cf
wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/antidrug.cf
wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/backhair.cf
wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/bigevil.cf
wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/bogus-virus-warnings.cf
wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/chickenpox.cf
wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/evilnumbers.cf
wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/header_abuse.cf
wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/mr_wiggly.cf
wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/ratware.cf
wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/weeds.cf

I update all the rulesets once a day.. These  are running
without any false positives on a rather large  production
environment so they will do well for the reiserfs mailing
list..

Cheers,
Cami

Re: Reiserfs, highquality meds source, low rates

[Hans Reiser]

Michael James wrote:

>On Monday 19 April 2004 23:40, Alexander Lyamin wrote:
>  
>
>>>i am just not sure how to kill THIS messages which look so....
>>>they dont look like spam, even to me upon first look.
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>> You need more software....
>>    
>>
>
>While Hans doesn't want to block posts by non-subscribers,
> could a non-subscriber return address be verified
> in the same way as a new subscription is?
>
>ie: If a non-subscriber posts; they get back a letter,
> "We recieved this posting to the Reiserfs List,
>  if you want it to appear, just hit reply."
>
From the list software's point of view
> they are actually subscribing, but with delivery supressed.
>
>Mailman can cope with a subscriber suspending delivery, (for holidays etc)
> it would be a case of jiggering the subscription to happen transparently.
>
>Just another slightly different hoop to trip up the spammers.
>michaelj
>
>PS: Thanks for you existing labours on this list, it's appreciated.
>
>  
>
I think that requiring a confirmation response by non-subscribers is 
acceptable, given the serious nuisance spam has become in the last 2 years.

RE: Reiserfs, highquality meds source, low rates

[Burnes, James]

Ah, security.  One word, dspam.

I haven't tried it with mailing lists in particular, but if it does it
should be dynamite.

http://www.nuclearelephant.com/projects/dspam/


jim burnes
security engineer
great-west, denver
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hans Reiser [mailto:reiser@namesys.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 9:45 AM
> To: Michael.James@csiro.au
> Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com; Alexander Lyamin
> Subject: Re: Reiserfs, highquality meds source, low rates
> 
> Michael James wrote:
> 
> >On Monday 19 April 2004 23:40, Alexander Lyamin wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>i am just not sure how to kill THIS messages which look so....
> >>>they dont look like spam, even to me upon first look.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> You need more software....
> >>
> >>
> >
> >While Hans doesn't want to block posts by non-subscribers,
> > could a non-subscriber return address be verified
> > in the same way as a new subscription is?
> >
> >ie: If a non-subscriber posts; they get back a letter,
> > "We recieved this posting to the Reiserfs List,
> >  if you want it to appear, just hit reply."
> >
> >From the list software's point of view
> > they are actually subscribing, but with delivery supressed.
> >
> >Mailman can cope with a subscriber suspending delivery, (for holidays
> etc)
> > it would be a case of jiggering the subscription to happen
> transparently.
> >
> >Just another slightly different hoop to trip up the spammers.
> >michaelj
> >
> >PS: Thanks for you existing labours on this list, it's appreciated.
> >
> >
> >
> I think that requiring a confirmation response by non-subscribers is
> acceptable, given the serious nuisance spam has become in the last 2
> years.

Re: Reiserfs, highquality meds source, low rates

[Hubert Chan]

>>>>> "Hans" == Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com> writes:

[...]

Hans> I think that requiring a confirmation response by non-subscribers
Hans> is acceptable, given the serious nuisance spam has become in the
Hans> last 2 years.

As long as it remembers who's already confirmed.  e.g. I read the list
through the gmane mail-news gateway, and don't want to have to confirm
every time I post a message.  If I only need to confirm once, that's
fine.

-- 
Hubert Chan <hubert@uhoreg.ca> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7  5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net.   Encrypted e-mail preferred.

Re: Reiserfs, highquality meds source, low rates

[Alexander Lyamin]

Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 04:02:39PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
> >>>>> "Hans" == Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com> writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
> Hans> I think that requiring a confirmation response by non-subscribers
> Hans> is acceptable, given the serious nuisance spam has become in the
> Hans> last 2 years.
> 
> As long as it remembers who's already confirmed.  e.g. I read the list
> through the gmane mail-news gateway, and don't want to have to confirm
> every time I post a message.  If I only need to confirm once, that's
> fine.

good idea, i think it could be done fast enough.
i'll try it..


> 
> -- 
> Hubert Chan <hubert@uhoreg.ca> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
> PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA
> Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7  5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
> Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net.   Encrypted e-mail preferred.

-- 
"the liberation loophole will make it clear.."
lex lyamin

Re: Reiserfs, highquality meds source, low rates

[Alexander Lyamin]

Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 06:55:25AM +0200, Cami wrote:
> >>>i am just not sure how to kill THIS messages which look so....
> >>>they dont look like spam, even to me upon first look.
> >>
> >>If you were using SpamAssasin, you wouldn't get these..
> >
> >
> >I _am_ using SpamAssassin, and I got this.  
> 
> 
> #!/bin/sh
> 

thanks, ill check those, and if they are sane, we will adopt them.

> cd /etc/mail/spamassassin
> wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/99_sare_adult.cf
> wget -nd -N 
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/99_sare_biz_market_learn_post25x.cf
> wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/99_sare_fraud_post25x.cf
> wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/99_sare_random.cf
> wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/99_FVGT_Tripwire.cf
> wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/99_OBFU_drugs.cf
> wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/99_sare_spoof.cf
> wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/antidrug.cf
> wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/backhair.cf
> wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/bigevil.cf
> wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/bogus-virus-warnings.cf
> wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/chickenpox.cf
> wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/evilnumbers.cf
> wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/header_abuse.cf
> wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/mr_wiggly.cf
> wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/ratware.cf
> wget -nd -N http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/weeds.cf
> 
> I update all the rulesets once a day.. These  are running
> without any false positives on a rather large  production
> environment so they will do well for the reiserfs mailing
> list..
> 
> Cheers,
> Cami

-- 
"the liberation loophole will make it clear.."
lex lyamin

RE: Reiserfs, highquality meds source, low rates

[Burnes, James]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Lyamin [mailto:flx@msu.ru]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 2:51 PM
> To: Cami
> Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
> Subject: Re: Reiserfs, highquality meds source, low rates
> 
> Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 06:55:25AM +0200, Cami wrote:
> > >>>i am just not sure how to kill THIS messages which look so....
> > >>>they dont look like spam, even to me upon first look.
> > >>
> > >>If you were using SpamAssasin, you wouldn't get these..
> > >
> > >
> > >I _am_ using SpamAssassin, and I got this.
> >
> >

SpamAssasin is really running out of steam right now, that is why they
have spent quite a bit of effort in developing the 'dspam' package.

It might have a chance at killing most spam.  Some people have their
doubts, but hope springs eternal....

JB

Re: Reiserfs, highquality meds source, low rates

[Alexander Lyamin]

Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 03:39:36PM -0600, Burnes, James wrote:
> SpamAssasin is really running out of steam right now, that is why they
> have spent quite a bit of effort in developing the 'dspam' package.

this saying convinced me to evaluate dspam once again.
thanks!
> It might have a chance at killing most spam.  Some people have their
> doubts, but hope springs eternal....

-- 
"the liberation loophole will make it clear.."
lex lyamin

Re: Reiserfs, highquality meds source, low rates

[Philippe Gramoullé]

Hello,

Being a sysadmin myself, i tend to find dspam way too complicated to set up
, read too time consuming to get a system up and running. (note that i didn't even tried
it for a Mailing-List setup).

On the other hand, crm114 was a : Read the 8 steps in the FAQ and i was up & running 5 minutes later,
with the shameless advantage of crm114 being already into the Debian package repository :)

So if you're short on time, then i'd advise to look at crm114 first and then dspam if crm114 doesn't fit
your needs.

Thanks,

Philippe

On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:40:28 +0400
Alexander Lyamin <flx@msu.ru> wrote:

  | Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 03:39:36PM -0600, Burnes, James wrote:
  | > SpamAssasin is really running out of steam right now, that is why they
  | > have spent quite a bit of effort in developing the 'dspam' package.
  | 
  | this saying convinced me to evaluate dspam once again.
  | thanks!
  | > It might have a chance at killing most spam.  Some people have their
  | > doubts, but hope springs eternal....
  | 
  | -- 
  | "the liberation loophole will make it clear.."
  | lex lyamin
  |