From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Antoine Ténart" <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>,
"Miquèl Raynal" <miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com>,
"Nadav Haklai" <nadavh@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next regression caused by "gpiolib: request the gpio before querying its direction"
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:59:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ziah2m3f.fsf@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3cce6903-d167-1bfc-38b4-1fdd7b3ff24b@codeaurora.org> (Timur Tabi's message of "Wed, 30 Aug 2017 07:31:41 -0500")
Hi Timur,
On mer., août 30 2017, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 8/30/17 4:24 AM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>> Therefore, with Timur's commit applied, when the system boots, we get
>> serial output, up to the point where gpiochip_add_data() is called, and
>> requests all GPIOs. Since our UART pins are not requested at the
>> pinctrl level, the gpio_request succeeds and re-muxes those pins as
>> GPIOs: we lose the UART.
>
> This part I don't understand. My patch just only impacts the code
> that queries the direction of the GPIO. It does not set the
> direction.
>
> When gpiochip_add_data() calls chip->request, what function is that
> calling?
the request callback is gpiochip_generic_request so I would be surprised
that there was a bug in it.
>
> The only thing I can think of is that the ->request function is not
> just returning status, but is also muxing the GPIO. If so, then I
> think that's a bug.
Gregory
>
> --
> Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
> Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
>
--
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: gregory.clement@free-electrons.com (Gregory CLEMENT)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: linux-next regression caused by "gpiolib: request the gpio before querying its direction"
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:59:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ziah2m3f.fsf@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3cce6903-d167-1bfc-38b4-1fdd7b3ff24b@codeaurora.org> (Timur Tabi's message of "Wed, 30 Aug 2017 07:31:41 -0500")
Hi Timur,
On mer., ao?t 30 2017, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 8/30/17 4:24 AM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>> Therefore, with Timur's commit applied, when the system boots, we get
>> serial output, up to the point where gpiochip_add_data() is called, and
>> requests all GPIOs. Since our UART pins are not requested at the
>> pinctrl level, the gpio_request succeeds and re-muxes those pins as
>> GPIOs: we lose the UART.
>
> This part I don't understand. My patch just only impacts the code
> that queries the direction of the GPIO. It does not set the
> direction.
>
> When gpiochip_add_data() calls chip->request, what function is that
> calling?
the request callback is gpiochip_generic_request so I would be surprised
that there was a bug in it.
>
> The only thing I can think of is that the ->request function is not
> just returning status, but is also muxing the GPIO. If so, then I
> think that's a bug.
Gregory
>
> --
> Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
> Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
>
--
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-30 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-30 9:24 linux-next regression caused by "gpiolib: request the gpio before querying its direction" Thomas Petazzoni
2017-08-30 9:24 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-08-30 12:31 ` Timur Tabi
2017-08-30 12:31 ` Timur Tabi
2017-08-30 13:59 ` Gregory CLEMENT [this message]
2017-08-30 13:59 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-08-30 14:17 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-08-30 14:17 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-08-30 14:22 ` Timur Tabi
2017-08-30 14:22 ` Timur Tabi
2017-08-30 14:32 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-08-30 14:32 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-08-30 16:24 ` jmondi
2017-08-30 16:24 ` jmondi
2017-08-30 19:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-08-30 19:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-08-31 7:08 ` Linus Walleij
2017-08-31 7:08 ` Linus Walleij
2017-08-31 7:18 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-08-31 7:18 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-08-31 7:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-08-31 7:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-08-31 9:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-08-31 9:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-08-31 9:39 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-08-31 9:39 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-08-31 18:39 ` Timur Tabi
2017-08-31 18:39 ` Timur Tabi
2017-08-31 9:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-08-31 9:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-08-31 13:05 ` Timur Tabi
2017-08-31 13:05 ` Timur Tabi
2017-08-31 10:08 ` Maxime Ripard
2017-08-31 10:08 ` Maxime Ripard
2017-08-31 7:04 ` Linus Walleij
2017-08-31 7:04 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ziah2m3f.fsf@free-electrons.com \
--to=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com \
--cc=nadavh@marvell.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.