From: Anand Suveer Jain <asj@kernel.org>
To: Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/13] fstests: verify IMA isolation on cloned filesystems
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 08:17:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <944e99e2-c927-43cc-b4d5-f810a31cce96@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <apcmEu9jmi3wljdW@zlang-mailbox>
On 2/9/26 03:58, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2026 at 03:39:07PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>> Add testcase to verify IMA measurement isolation when multiple devices
>> share the same FSUUID.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <asj@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> tests/generic/804 | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> tests/generic/804.out | 10 ++++
>> 2 files changed, 118 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 tests/generic/804
>> create mode 100644 tests/generic/804.out
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/generic/804 b/tests/generic/804
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..ced32e6d79dd
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/generic/804
>> @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
>> +#! /bin/bash
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +# Copyright (c) 2026 Anand Jain <asj@kernel.org>. All Rights Reserved.
>> +#
>> +# FS QA Test 804
>> +# Verify IMA isolation on cloned filesystems:
>> +# . Mount two devices sharing the same FSUUID (cloned).
>> +# . Apply an IMA policy to measure files based on that FSUUID.
>> +# . Create unique files on each mount point to trigger measurements.
>> +# . Confirm the IMA log correctly attributes events to the respective mounts.
>> +
>> +. ./common/preamble
>> +. ./common/filter
>> +
>> +_begin_fstest auto quick clone
>> +
>> +_require_test
>> +_require_block_device $TEST_DEV
>> +_require_loop
>> +
>> +_fixed_by_fs_commit btrfs xxxxxxxxxxxx \
>> + "btrfs: use on-disk uuid for s_uuid in temp_fsid mounts"
>> +_fixed_by_fs_commit btrfs xxxxxxxxxxxx \
>> + "btrfs: derive f_fsid from on-disk fsuuid and dev_t"
>> +
>> +_cleanup()
>> +{
>> + cd /
>> + rm -r -f $tmp.*
>> + _unmount $mnt1 2>/dev/null
>> + _unmount $mnt2 2>/dev/null
>> + _loop_image_destroy "${devs[@]}" 2> /dev/null
>> +}
>> +
>> +# Normalize device names and mount points
>> +filter_pool()
>> +{
>> + sed -e "s|${devs[0]}|DEV1|g" -e "s|$mnt1|MNT1|g" \
>> + -e "s|${devs[1]}|DEV2|g" -e "s|$mnt2|MNT2|g" | _filter_spaces
>> +}
>> +
>> +# Core helper to set IMA policy and check measurement logs
>> +do_ima()
>> +{
>> + local ima_policy="/sys/kernel/security/ima/policy"
>> + local ima_log="/sys/kernel/security/ima/ascii_runtime_measurements"
>> + local fsuuid
>> + local mnt=$1
>> + local enable=$2
>> +
>> + # Since the in-memory IMA audit log is only cleared upon reboot,
>> + # use unique random filenames to avoid log collisions.
>> + local foofile=$(mktemp --dry-run foobar_XXXXX)
>> +
>> + echo $mnt $enable | filter_pool
>> +
>> + [ -w "$ima_policy" ] || _notrun "IMA policy not writable"
>
> How about a _require_security_ima to make sure there's securityfs
> and IMA supporting in current kernel.
>
sure. added.
_require_security_ima()
{
[ -d /sys/kernel/security ] || _notrun "kernel doesn't support
securityfs"
# securityfs may not be mounted yet on the host; mount it
# in a scratch location just to probe for IMA support.
local se_mnt="${TEST_MNT}/${seq}/se_mnt"
local has_ima=1
mkdir -p "${se_mnt}"
_mount -t securityfs securityfs "${se_mnt}" 2>/dev/null ||
_notrun "cannot mount securityfs"
[ -d "${se_mnt}/ima" ] || has_ima=0
[ -w "${se_mnt}/ima/policy" ] || _notrun "IMA policy not writable"
_unmount "${se_mnt}"
[ $has_ima -eq 1 ] || _notrun "kernel doesn't support IMA"
}
>> +
>> + fsuuid=$(blkid -s UUID -o value ${devs[0]})
>> +
>> + # Load IMA policy to measure file access specifically for this
>> + # filesystem UUID.
>> + if [[ $enable -eq 1 ]]; then
>> + echo "measure func=FILE_CHECK fsuuid=$fsuuid" > "$ima_policy" || \
>
> I'm not sure if we should have this test, especially add it into
> auto and quick group. Once an IMA policy is loaded, there is no way to
> clear or roll it back, and I am concerned it might potentially interfere
> with subsequent tests.
>
Removed quick and auto. Looks like we need to gate it behind an opt-in
group or restrict it to disposable/reboot-per-run environments. New
group? I'm concerned it's getting too complicated and I see no other choice.
> Hmm... how about use `unshare` command to rewrite the do_ima as do_ima_in_ns?
> For example:
> do_ima_in_ns()
> {
> ...
>
> unshare -U -m -p --fork --map-root-user bash <<EOF
> mount -t securityfs securityfs /sys/kernel/security
> ima_policy="/sys/kernel/security/ima/policy"
> ima_log="/sys/kernel/security/ima/ascii_runtime_measurements"
> echo "measure func=FILE_CHECK fsuuid=$uuid" > "\$ima_policy" || exit 1
> ...
> EOF
> ret=$?
> }
A new namespace doesn't help undo the loaded IMA policy; I don't see the
point of using unshare.
I have the following code using unshare, which works fine. I dropped -U
and --map-root-user (since fstests needs to run as root). I'm okay with
including unshare, but I still don't see why.
--------
unshare -m -p --fork bash <<-EOF | filter_pool | sed
"s/$foofile/FOOBAR_FILE/"
ima_policy="/sys/kernel/security/ima/policy"
ima_log="/sys/kernel/security/ima/ascii_runtime_measurements"
mount -t securityfs securityfs /sys/kernel/security ||
exit 1
# Load IMA policy to measure file access specifically
for this
# filesystem UUID.
if [ $enable -eq 1 ]; then
echo "measure func=FILE_CHECK fsuuid=$fsuuid" >
"\$ima_policy" || exit 1
fi
# Create a file to trigger measurement and verify its
entry in
# the IMA log.
echo "test_data" > $mnt/$foofile
# IMA log extract
grep $foofile "\$ima_log" | awk '{ print \$5 }'
echo "dbg: $mnt $fsuuid $foofile" >> $seqres.full
tail -1 "\$ima_log" >> $seqres.full
echo >> $seqres.full
EOF
--------
Thanks.
>
> Thanks,
> Zorro
>
>> + _notrun "Policy rejected"
>> + fi
>> +
>> + # Create a file to trigger measurement and verify its entry in
>> + # the IMA log.
>> + echo "test_data" > $mnt/$foofile
>> +
>> + # IMA log extract
>> + grep $foofile "$ima_log" | awk '{ print $5 }' | filter_pool | \
>> + sed "s/$foofile/FOOBAR_FILE/"
>> +
>> + echo "dbg: $mnt $fsuuid $foofile" >> $seqres.full
>> + cat $ima_log | tail -1 >> $seqres.full
>> + echo >> $seqres.full
>> +}
>> +
>> +# Initialize loop base and cloned instances
>> +devs=()
>> +_loop_image_create_clone devs
>> +mnt1=$TEST_DIR/$seq/mnt1
>> +mnt2=$TEST_DIR/$seq/mnt2
>> +mkdir -p $mnt1
>> +mkdir -p $mnt2
>> +
>> +# Concurrently mount both clones
>> +_mount $(_common_dev_mount_options) $(_clone_mount_option) ${devs[0]} $mnt1 || \
>> + _fail "Failed to mount dev1"
>> +_mount $(_common_dev_mount_options) $(_clone_mount_option) ${devs[1]} $mnt2 || \
>> + _fail "Failed to mount dev2"
>> +
>> +# IMA response on baseline and clone configuration
>> +do_ima $mnt1 1
>> +do_ima $mnt2 0
>> +
>> +# Cycle mount on the second device.
>> +echo mount cycle
>> +_unmount $mnt2
>> +_mount $mount_opts ${devs[1]} $mnt2 || _fail "Failed to mount dev2"
>> +
>> +do_ima $mnt1 0
>> +do_ima $mnt2 0
>> +
>> +status=0
>> +exit
>> diff --git a/tests/generic/804.out b/tests/generic/804.out
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..9804181d6c17
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/generic/804.out
>> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
>> +QA output created by 804
>> +MNT1 1
>> +MNT1/FOOBAR_FILE
>> +MNT2 0
>> +MNT2/FOOBAR_FILE
>> +mount cycle
>> +MNT1 0
>> +MNT1/FOOBAR_FILE
>> +MNT2 0
>> +MNT2/FOOBAR_FILE
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anand Suveer Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>
Cc: djwong@kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v8 10/13] fstests: verify IMA isolation on cloned filesystems
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 08:17:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <944e99e2-c927-43cc-b4d5-f810a31cce96@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <apcmEu9jmi3wljdW@zlang-mailbox>
On 2/9/26 03:58, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2026 at 03:39:07PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>> Add testcase to verify IMA measurement isolation when multiple devices
>> share the same FSUUID.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <asj@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> tests/generic/804 | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> tests/generic/804.out | 10 ++++
>> 2 files changed, 118 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 tests/generic/804
>> create mode 100644 tests/generic/804.out
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/generic/804 b/tests/generic/804
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..ced32e6d79dd
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/generic/804
>> @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
>> +#! /bin/bash
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +# Copyright (c) 2026 Anand Jain <asj@kernel.org>. All Rights Reserved.
>> +#
>> +# FS QA Test 804
>> +# Verify IMA isolation on cloned filesystems:
>> +# . Mount two devices sharing the same FSUUID (cloned).
>> +# . Apply an IMA policy to measure files based on that FSUUID.
>> +# . Create unique files on each mount point to trigger measurements.
>> +# . Confirm the IMA log correctly attributes events to the respective mounts.
>> +
>> +. ./common/preamble
>> +. ./common/filter
>> +
>> +_begin_fstest auto quick clone
>> +
>> +_require_test
>> +_require_block_device $TEST_DEV
>> +_require_loop
>> +
>> +_fixed_by_fs_commit btrfs xxxxxxxxxxxx \
>> + "btrfs: use on-disk uuid for s_uuid in temp_fsid mounts"
>> +_fixed_by_fs_commit btrfs xxxxxxxxxxxx \
>> + "btrfs: derive f_fsid from on-disk fsuuid and dev_t"
>> +
>> +_cleanup()
>> +{
>> + cd /
>> + rm -r -f $tmp.*
>> + _unmount $mnt1 2>/dev/null
>> + _unmount $mnt2 2>/dev/null
>> + _loop_image_destroy "${devs[@]}" 2> /dev/null
>> +}
>> +
>> +# Normalize device names and mount points
>> +filter_pool()
>> +{
>> + sed -e "s|${devs[0]}|DEV1|g" -e "s|$mnt1|MNT1|g" \
>> + -e "s|${devs[1]}|DEV2|g" -e "s|$mnt2|MNT2|g" | _filter_spaces
>> +}
>> +
>> +# Core helper to set IMA policy and check measurement logs
>> +do_ima()
>> +{
>> + local ima_policy="/sys/kernel/security/ima/policy"
>> + local ima_log="/sys/kernel/security/ima/ascii_runtime_measurements"
>> + local fsuuid
>> + local mnt=$1
>> + local enable=$2
>> +
>> + # Since the in-memory IMA audit log is only cleared upon reboot,
>> + # use unique random filenames to avoid log collisions.
>> + local foofile=$(mktemp --dry-run foobar_XXXXX)
>> +
>> + echo $mnt $enable | filter_pool
>> +
>> + [ -w "$ima_policy" ] || _notrun "IMA policy not writable"
>
> How about a _require_security_ima to make sure there's securityfs
> and IMA supporting in current kernel.
>
sure. added.
_require_security_ima()
{
[ -d /sys/kernel/security ] || _notrun "kernel doesn't support
securityfs"
# securityfs may not be mounted yet on the host; mount it
# in a scratch location just to probe for IMA support.
local se_mnt="${TEST_MNT}/${seq}/se_mnt"
local has_ima=1
mkdir -p "${se_mnt}"
_mount -t securityfs securityfs "${se_mnt}" 2>/dev/null ||
_notrun "cannot mount securityfs"
[ -d "${se_mnt}/ima" ] || has_ima=0
[ -w "${se_mnt}/ima/policy" ] || _notrun "IMA policy not writable"
_unmount "${se_mnt}"
[ $has_ima -eq 1 ] || _notrun "kernel doesn't support IMA"
}
>> +
>> + fsuuid=$(blkid -s UUID -o value ${devs[0]})
>> +
>> + # Load IMA policy to measure file access specifically for this
>> + # filesystem UUID.
>> + if [[ $enable -eq 1 ]]; then
>> + echo "measure func=FILE_CHECK fsuuid=$fsuuid" > "$ima_policy" || \
>
> I'm not sure if we should have this test, especially add it into
> auto and quick group. Once an IMA policy is loaded, there is no way to
> clear or roll it back, and I am concerned it might potentially interfere
> with subsequent tests.
>
Removed quick and auto. Looks like we need to gate it behind an opt-in
group or restrict it to disposable/reboot-per-run environments. New
group? I'm concerned it's getting too complicated and I see no other choice.
> Hmm... how about use `unshare` command to rewrite the do_ima as do_ima_in_ns?
> For example:
> do_ima_in_ns()
> {
> ...
>
> unshare -U -m -p --fork --map-root-user bash <<EOF
> mount -t securityfs securityfs /sys/kernel/security
> ima_policy="/sys/kernel/security/ima/policy"
> ima_log="/sys/kernel/security/ima/ascii_runtime_measurements"
> echo "measure func=FILE_CHECK fsuuid=$uuid" > "\$ima_policy" || exit 1
> ...
> EOF
> ret=$?
> }
A new namespace doesn't help undo the loaded IMA policy; I don't see the
point of using unshare.
I have the following code using unshare, which works fine. I dropped -U
and --map-root-user (since fstests needs to run as root). I'm okay with
including unshare, but I still don't see why.
--------
unshare -m -p --fork bash <<-EOF | filter_pool | sed
"s/$foofile/FOOBAR_FILE/"
ima_policy="/sys/kernel/security/ima/policy"
ima_log="/sys/kernel/security/ima/ascii_runtime_measurements"
mount -t securityfs securityfs /sys/kernel/security ||
exit 1
# Load IMA policy to measure file access specifically
for this
# filesystem UUID.
if [ $enable -eq 1 ]; then
echo "measure func=FILE_CHECK fsuuid=$fsuuid" >
"\$ima_policy" || exit 1
fi
# Create a file to trigger measurement and verify its
entry in
# the IMA log.
echo "test_data" > $mnt/$foofile
# IMA log extract
grep $foofile "\$ima_log" | awk '{ print \$5 }'
echo "dbg: $mnt $fsuuid $foofile" >> $seqres.full
tail -1 "\$ima_log" >> $seqres.full
echo >> $seqres.full
EOF
--------
Thanks.
>
> Thanks,
> Zorro
>
>> + _notrun "Policy rejected"
>> + fi
>> +
>> + # Create a file to trigger measurement and verify its entry in
>> + # the IMA log.
>> + echo "test_data" > $mnt/$foofile
>> +
>> + # IMA log extract
>> + grep $foofile "$ima_log" | awk '{ print $5 }' | filter_pool | \
>> + sed "s/$foofile/FOOBAR_FILE/"
>> +
>> + echo "dbg: $mnt $fsuuid $foofile" >> $seqres.full
>> + cat $ima_log | tail -1 >> $seqres.full
>> + echo >> $seqres.full
>> +}
>> +
>> +# Initialize loop base and cloned instances
>> +devs=()
>> +_loop_image_create_clone devs
>> +mnt1=$TEST_DIR/$seq/mnt1
>> +mnt2=$TEST_DIR/$seq/mnt2
>> +mkdir -p $mnt1
>> +mkdir -p $mnt2
>> +
>> +# Concurrently mount both clones
>> +_mount $(_common_dev_mount_options) $(_clone_mount_option) ${devs[0]} $mnt1 || \
>> + _fail "Failed to mount dev1"
>> +_mount $(_common_dev_mount_options) $(_clone_mount_option) ${devs[1]} $mnt2 || \
>> + _fail "Failed to mount dev2"
>> +
>> +# IMA response on baseline and clone configuration
>> +do_ima $mnt1 1
>> +do_ima $mnt2 0
>> +
>> +# Cycle mount on the second device.
>> +echo mount cycle
>> +_unmount $mnt2
>> +_mount $mount_opts ${devs[1]} $mnt2 || _fail "Failed to mount dev2"
>> +
>> +do_ima $mnt1 0
>> +do_ima $mnt2 0
>> +
>> +status=0
>> +exit
>> diff --git a/tests/generic/804.out b/tests/generic/804.out
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..9804181d6c17
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/generic/804.out
>> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
>> +QA output created by 804
>> +MNT1 1
>> +MNT1/FOOBAR_FILE
>> +MNT2 0
>> +MNT2/FOOBAR_FILE
>> +mount cycle
>> +MNT1 0
>> +MNT1/FOOBAR_FILE
>> +MNT2 0
>> +MNT2/FOOBAR_FILE
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 0:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-25 7:38 [PATCH v8 0/13] fstests: add test coverage for cloned filesystem ids Anand Jain
2026-07-25 7:38 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-07-25 7:38 ` [PATCH v8 01/13] fstests: add _loop_image_create_clone() helper Anand Jain
2026-07-25 7:38 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-01 12:33 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-01 12:33 ` [f2fs-dev] " Zorro Lang via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-01 13:52 ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-09-01 13:52 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Suveer Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-07-25 7:38 ` [PATCH v8 02/13] fstests: add _clone_mount_option() helper Anand Jain
2026-07-25 7:38 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-01 12:39 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-01 12:39 ` [f2fs-dev] " Zorro Lang via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-01 13:54 ` Anand Suveer Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-01 13:54 ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [PATCH v8 03/13] fstests: add FSNOTIFYWAIT_PROG Anand Jain
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-01 15:37 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-01 15:37 ` [f2fs-dev] " Zorro Lang via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [PATCH v8 04/13] fstests: add _require_fanotify_function Anand Jain
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-01 15:42 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-01 15:42 ` [f2fs-dev] " Zorro Lang via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-01 22:39 ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-09-01 22:39 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Suveer Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [PATCH v8 05/13] fstests: add _require_unique_f_fsid() helper Anand Jain
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-01 16:09 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-01 16:09 ` [f2fs-dev] " Zorro Lang via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-01 23:32 ` Anand Suveer Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-01 23:32 ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [PATCH v8 06/13] fstests: add SEMANAGE_PROG Anand Jain
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [PATCH v8 07/13] fstests: verify fanotify isolation on cloned filesystems Anand Jain
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-01 18:23 ` Zorro Lang via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-01 18:23 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-04 6:14 ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-09-04 6:14 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Suveer Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [PATCH v8 08/13] fstests: verify f_fsid for " Anand Jain
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-01 18:51 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-01 18:51 ` [f2fs-dev] " Zorro Lang via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-20 14:10 ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-09-20 14:10 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Suveer Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [PATCH v8 09/13] fstests: verify libblkid resolution of duplicate UUIDs Anand Jain
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-01 19:12 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-01 19:12 ` [f2fs-dev] " Zorro Lang via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-20 14:10 ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-09-20 14:10 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Suveer Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [PATCH v8 10/13] fstests: verify IMA isolation on cloned filesystems Anand Jain
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-01 19:58 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-01 19:58 ` [f2fs-dev] " Zorro Lang via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-28 0:17 ` Anand Suveer Jain [this message]
2026-09-28 0:17 ` Anand Suveer Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [PATCH v8 11/13] fstests: verify exportfs file handles " Anand Jain
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-01 20:29 ` Zorro Lang via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-01 20:29 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-01 20:30 ` [f2fs-dev] " Zorro Lang via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-01 20:30 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-20 15:30 ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-09-20 15:30 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Suveer Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [PATCH v8 12/13] fstests: add _change_metadata_uuid helper Anand Jain
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-01 20:53 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-01 20:53 ` [f2fs-dev] " Zorro Lang via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-20 15:39 ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-09-20 15:39 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Suveer Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [PATCH v8 13/13] fstests: test UUID consistency for clones with metadata_uuid Anand Jain
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-01 20:51 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-01 20:51 ` [f2fs-dev] " Zorro Lang via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-27 4:41 ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-09-27 4:41 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Suveer Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-27 15:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-09-27 15:06 ` [f2fs-dev] " Darrick J. Wong via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-27 22:48 ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-09-27 22:48 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Suveer Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-31 7:17 ` [PATCH v8 0/13] fstests: add test coverage for cloned filesystem ids Anand Suveer Jain
2026-08-31 7:17 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Suveer Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-20 15:55 ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-09-20 15:55 ` [f2fs-dev] " Anand Suveer Jain via Linux-f2fs-devel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=944e99e2-c927-43cc-b4d5-f810a31cce96@kernel.org \
--to=asj@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.