From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 4/6] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Request direct mapping for modem device
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 23:40:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98fa2940456ade2bd0998dfaa6386653@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49c8c377-961b-3f95-a99c-08528def4cb7@arm.com>
Hi Robin,
On 2020-04-20 22:39, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2020-04-20 5:42 pm, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
>> From: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> Request direct mapping for modem on platforms which don't have
>> TrustZone
>> (which programs the modem SIDs) to prevent the following global faults
>> seen
>> on Cheza/Trogdor:
>
> Not strictly true - it's patch #6/6 that prevents *those* faults (and
> these days the driver should be reporting unmatched streams a little
> more helpfully). This change would resolve the context faults and/or
> weird memory corruption that might result from applying patch #6 alone
> - this is the crazy thing where transactions sometimes go directly to
> DRAM round the side of the SMMU so we can never safely remap anything,
> right?
>
True this doesnt prevent global faults, the fault details should go to
patch6.
I'll update the commit msg something like below:
The Q6 modem sub-system has direct access to DDR through memnoc.
Also SMMU is not expected to provide access control/translation for
these SIDs
(sandboxing of the modem is achieved through XPUs engaged using SMC
calls).
Thanks,
Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 4/6] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Request direct mapping for modem device
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 23:40:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98fa2940456ade2bd0998dfaa6386653@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49c8c377-961b-3f95-a99c-08528def4cb7@arm.com>
Hi Robin,
On 2020-04-20 22:39, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2020-04-20 5:42 pm, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
>> From: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> Request direct mapping for modem on platforms which don't have
>> TrustZone
>> (which programs the modem SIDs) to prevent the following global faults
>> seen
>> on Cheza/Trogdor:
>
> Not strictly true - it's patch #6/6 that prevents *those* faults (and
> these days the driver should be reporting unmatched streams a little
> more helpfully). This change would resolve the context faults and/or
> weird memory corruption that might result from applying patch #6 alone
> - this is the crazy thing where transactions sometimes go directly to
> DRAM round the side of the SMMU so we can never safely remap anything,
> right?
>
True this doesnt prevent global faults, the fault details should go to
patch6.
I'll update the commit msg something like below:
The Q6 modem sub-system has direct access to DDR through memnoc.
Also SMMU is not expected to provide access control/translation for
these SIDs
(sandboxing of the modem is achieved through XPUs engaged using SMC
calls).
Thanks,
Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 4/6] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Request direct mapping for modem device
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 23:40:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98fa2940456ade2bd0998dfaa6386653@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49c8c377-961b-3f95-a99c-08528def4cb7@arm.com>
Hi Robin,
On 2020-04-20 22:39, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2020-04-20 5:42 pm, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
>> From: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> Request direct mapping for modem on platforms which don't have
>> TrustZone
>> (which programs the modem SIDs) to prevent the following global faults
>> seen
>> on Cheza/Trogdor:
>
> Not strictly true - it's patch #6/6 that prevents *those* faults (and
> these days the driver should be reporting unmatched streams a little
> more helpfully). This change would resolve the context faults and/or
> weird memory corruption that might result from applying patch #6 alone
> - this is the crazy thing where transactions sometimes go directly to
> DRAM round the side of the SMMU so we can never safely remap anything,
> right?
>
True this doesnt prevent global faults, the fault details should go to
patch6.
I'll update the commit msg something like below:
The Q6 modem sub-system has direct access to DDR through memnoc.
Also SMMU is not expected to provide access control/translation for
these SIDs
(sandboxing of the modem is achieved through XPUs engaged using SMC
calls).
Thanks,
Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-20 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-20 16:41 [PATCHv3 0/6] iommu/arm-smmu: Allow client devices to select identity mapping Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 16:41 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 16:41 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 16:41 ` [PATCHv3 1/6] iommu: arm-smmu-impl: Convert to a generic reset implementation Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 16:41 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 16:41 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 16:42 ` [PATCHv3 2/6] iommu/arm-smmu: Allow client devices to select direct mapping Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 16:42 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 16:42 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 16:57 ` Robin Murphy
2020-04-20 16:57 ` Robin Murphy
2020-04-20 16:57 ` Robin Murphy
2020-04-20 18:36 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 18:36 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 18:36 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 16:42 ` [PATCHv3 3/6] iommu/arm-smmu: Implement iommu_ops->def_domain_type call-back Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 16:42 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 16:42 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 16:59 ` Robin Murphy
2020-04-20 16:59 ` Robin Murphy
2020-04-20 16:59 ` Robin Murphy
2020-04-20 16:42 ` [PATCHv3 4/6] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Request direct mapping for modem device Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 16:42 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 16:42 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 17:09 ` Robin Murphy
2020-04-20 17:09 ` Robin Murphy
2020-04-20 17:09 ` Robin Murphy
2020-04-20 18:10 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan [this message]
2020-04-20 18:10 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 18:10 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 16:42 ` [PATCHv3 5/6] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: Add iommus property Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 16:42 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 16:42 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 16:42 ` [PATCHv3 6/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-cheza: " Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 16:42 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-20 16:42 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98fa2940456ade2bd0998dfaa6386653@codeaurora.org \
--to=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jcrouse@codeaurora.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sibis@codeaurora.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.