From: Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@linux.dev>
To: Icenowy Zheng <uwu@icenowy.me>, Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@kernel.org>,
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Zhihong Dong <donmor3000@hotmail.com>,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] loongarch/mm: disable WUC for pgprot_writecombine as same as ioremap_wc
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 15:46:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d3df174-5e86-4b04-bdcb-eb1bbfd41ef6@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8348a0abe70ce9ddd584cf7170946bd8646578cd.camel@icenowy.me>
On 2024/12/19 14:34, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 在 2024-12-19星期四的 13:49 +0800,Sui Jingfeng写道:
>> On 2024/12/19 12:49, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>>> 在 2024-12-19星期四的 10:54 +0800,Sui Jingfeng写道:
>>>> On 2024/12/18 20:43, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>>>>> For the fact of drm/ast's dramatical drop, it's because write
>>>>> to
>>>>> the
>>>>> framebuffer can no longer be reordered.
>>>> No, your understanding is wrong, very very wrong and a big wrong.
>>>>
>>>> It's not because it can't reorder the write. Rather, it's because
>>>> that the CPU can't do write gathering and can't do burst write
>>>> any
>>>> more.
>>> Write gathering is a kind of write reordering,
>>
>> No, your understanding is broken.
>>
>> Write gathering *isn't* a kind of write reordering.
>> Its doesn't have to reorder, it just cache the write operation with
>> the CPU's write buffer.
>>
>>
>>> comparing to strongly
>>> ordered writing (which is literally one byte per write).
>>>
>>>> So do you still think your patch is harmless?
>>> Well, I said that performance w/o correctness is meaningless.
>>
>> The point is that Write-Combine on drm/ast will get both correctness
>> and performance.
> But in general writecombining is broken
Cached coherent ARM64 SoC has similar issue, but they didn't disable
WC in that arch-specific code.
Again, your understanding is broken.
> (if it's broken in one place,
> it's broken and not totally right, and needs to be handled).
No, your logic is completely wrong here.
1) We needs the *hardware* details (not bug phenomenon description) before make
further judgement.
2) Its very likely that the specific device driver that suffer from the problems
is broken.
3) Loongson downstream kernel has the write-combine enabled, and all drm drivers
works very well.
Its just that you guys chase to radeon/andgpu driver, doing the abuse at arch
specific code.
>
--
Best regards,
Sui
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-19 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-09 4:28 [PATCH v2] loongarch/mm: disable WUC for pgprot_writecombine as same as ioremap_wc Icenowy Zheng
2023-10-09 14:32 ` Sui Jingfeng
2023-10-10 0:15 ` WANG Xuerui
2023-10-10 3:02 ` Sui Jingfeng
2023-10-10 12:26 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-10-13 11:12 ` Sui Jingfeng
2023-10-13 12:51 ` Sui Jingfeng
2023-10-13 13:15 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-10-13 13:53 ` Xi Ruoyao
2025-01-21 9:19 ` Sui Jingfeng
2024-12-02 16:23 ` Sui Jingfeng
2024-12-17 18:18 ` Shuah
2024-12-18 3:24 ` Sui Jingfeng
2024-12-18 6:23 ` Icenowy Zheng
2024-12-18 10:05 ` Sui Jingfeng
2024-12-18 12:37 ` Icenowy Zheng
2024-12-19 3:17 ` Sui Jingfeng
2024-12-19 4:54 ` Icenowy Zheng
2024-12-20 16:43 ` Shuah
2024-12-17 23:44 ` Icenowy Zheng
2024-12-18 3:05 ` Sui Jingfeng
2024-12-18 5:47 ` Icenowy Zheng
2024-12-18 10:29 ` Sui Jingfeng
2024-12-18 12:43 ` Icenowy Zheng
2024-12-19 2:54 ` Sui Jingfeng
2024-12-19 4:49 ` Icenowy Zheng
2024-12-19 5:49 ` Sui Jingfeng
2024-12-19 6:34 ` Icenowy Zheng
2024-12-19 7:46 ` Sui Jingfeng [this message]
2024-12-19 6:38 ` Icenowy Zheng
2024-12-19 10:39 ` Sui Jingfeng
2023-10-10 0:50 ` Icenowy Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9d3df174-5e86-4b04-bdcb-eb1bbfd41ef6@linux.dev \
--to=sui.jingfeng@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=donmor3000@hotmail.com \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
--cc=uwu@icenowy.me \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xry111@xry111.site \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.