All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
To: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>,
	Algea Cao <algea.cao@rock-chips.com>,
	vkoul@kernel.org, kishon@kernel.org, heiko@sntech.de,
	andy.yan@rock-chips.com
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] phy: phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx: Fix PHY PLL output 50.25MHz error
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 19:02:51 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e29ef0e-c373-4f48-8f37-7111987d2dd0@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D9XP2BH2CU02.1R9E1GSXQD9JB@cknow.org>

Hi Diederik,

On 5/16/25 6:36 PM, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun Apr 27, 2025 at 11:51 AM CEST, Algea Cao wrote:
>> When using HDMI PLL frequency division coefficient at 50.25MHz
>> that is calculated by rk_hdptx_phy_clk_pll_calc(), it fails to
>> get PHY LANE lock. Although the calculated values are within the
>> allowable range of PHY PLL configuration.
>>
>> In order to fix the PHY LANE lock error and provide the expected
>> 50.25MHz output, manually compute the required PHY PLL frequency
>> division coefficient and add it to ropll_tmds_cfg configuration
>> table.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Algea Cao <algea.cao@rock-chips.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
>>
>> ---
>>  drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c
>> index fe7c05748356..77236f012a1f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c
>> @@ -476,6 +476,8 @@ static const struct ropll_config ropll_tmds_cfg[] = {
>>  	  1, 1, 0, 0x20, 0x0c, 1, 0x0e, 0, 0, },
>>  	{ 650000, 162, 162, 1, 1, 11, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 54, 0, 16, 4, 1,
>>  	  1, 1, 0, 0x20, 0x0c, 1, 0x0e, 0, 0, },
>> +	{ 502500, 84, 84, 1, 1, 7, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 11, 1, 4, 5,
>> +	  4, 11, 1, 0, 0x20, 0x0c, 1, 0x0e, 0, 0, },
>>  	{ 337500, 0x70, 0x70, 1, 1, 0xf, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0x2, 0, 0x01, 5,
>>  	  1, 1, 1, 0, 0x20, 0x0c, 1, 0x0e, 0, 0, },
>>  	{ 400000, 100, 100, 1, 1, 11, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0x9, 0, 0x05, 0,
> 
> I found this patch in the 'fixes' branch in linux-phy:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/phy/linux-phy.git/commit/?h=fixes&id=f9475055b11c0c70979bd1667a76b2ebae638eb7
> 
> In the 'next' branch in linux-phy, I found this commit:
> 0edf9d2bb9b4 ("phy: rockchip: samsung-hdptx: Avoid Hz<->hHz unit conversion overhead")
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/phy/linux-phy.git/commit/?h=next&id=0edf9d2bb9b4ba7566dfdc7605883e04575129d9
> 
> Where the values in ropll_tmds_cfg are converted from hHz to Hz and the
> data type changes from u32 to unsigned long long.
> But AFAICT it does NOT convert this '502500' value, which IIUC means
> most values are in Hz, while this one is in hHz.
> 
> Am I missing something or should this new value also be converted?

Yeah, the conversion is necessary. FWIW, this has been already fixed by
Stephen Rothwell in linux-next, while Vinod will handle it before
sending the PR:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/aCXEOGUDcnaoGKWW@vaman/

Regards,
Cristian


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
To: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>,
	Algea Cao <algea.cao@rock-chips.com>,
	vkoul@kernel.org, kishon@kernel.org, heiko@sntech.de,
	andy.yan@rock-chips.com
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] phy: phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx: Fix PHY PLL output 50.25MHz error
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 19:02:51 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e29ef0e-c373-4f48-8f37-7111987d2dd0@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D9XP2BH2CU02.1R9E1GSXQD9JB@cknow.org>

Hi Diederik,

On 5/16/25 6:36 PM, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun Apr 27, 2025 at 11:51 AM CEST, Algea Cao wrote:
>> When using HDMI PLL frequency division coefficient at 50.25MHz
>> that is calculated by rk_hdptx_phy_clk_pll_calc(), it fails to
>> get PHY LANE lock. Although the calculated values are within the
>> allowable range of PHY PLL configuration.
>>
>> In order to fix the PHY LANE lock error and provide the expected
>> 50.25MHz output, manually compute the required PHY PLL frequency
>> division coefficient and add it to ropll_tmds_cfg configuration
>> table.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Algea Cao <algea.cao@rock-chips.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
>>
>> ---
>>  drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c
>> index fe7c05748356..77236f012a1f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c
>> @@ -476,6 +476,8 @@ static const struct ropll_config ropll_tmds_cfg[] = {
>>  	  1, 1, 0, 0x20, 0x0c, 1, 0x0e, 0, 0, },
>>  	{ 650000, 162, 162, 1, 1, 11, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 54, 0, 16, 4, 1,
>>  	  1, 1, 0, 0x20, 0x0c, 1, 0x0e, 0, 0, },
>> +	{ 502500, 84, 84, 1, 1, 7, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 11, 1, 4, 5,
>> +	  4, 11, 1, 0, 0x20, 0x0c, 1, 0x0e, 0, 0, },
>>  	{ 337500, 0x70, 0x70, 1, 1, 0xf, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0x2, 0, 0x01, 5,
>>  	  1, 1, 1, 0, 0x20, 0x0c, 1, 0x0e, 0, 0, },
>>  	{ 400000, 100, 100, 1, 1, 11, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0x9, 0, 0x05, 0,
> 
> I found this patch in the 'fixes' branch in linux-phy:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/phy/linux-phy.git/commit/?h=fixes&id=f9475055b11c0c70979bd1667a76b2ebae638eb7
> 
> In the 'next' branch in linux-phy, I found this commit:
> 0edf9d2bb9b4 ("phy: rockchip: samsung-hdptx: Avoid Hz<->hHz unit conversion overhead")
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/phy/linux-phy.git/commit/?h=next&id=0edf9d2bb9b4ba7566dfdc7605883e04575129d9
> 
> Where the values in ropll_tmds_cfg are converted from hHz to Hz and the
> data type changes from u32 to unsigned long long.
> But AFAICT it does NOT convert this '502500' value, which IIUC means
> most values are in Hz, while this one is in hHz.
> 
> Am I missing something or should this new value also be converted?

Yeah, the conversion is necessary. FWIW, this has been already fixed by
Stephen Rothwell in linux-next, while Vinod will handle it before
sending the PR:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/aCXEOGUDcnaoGKWW@vaman/

Regards,
Cristian

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
To: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>,
	Algea Cao <algea.cao@rock-chips.com>,
	vkoul@kernel.org, kishon@kernel.org, heiko@sntech.de,
	andy.yan@rock-chips.com
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] phy: phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx: Fix PHY PLL output 50.25MHz error
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 19:02:51 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e29ef0e-c373-4f48-8f37-7111987d2dd0@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D9XP2BH2CU02.1R9E1GSXQD9JB@cknow.org>

Hi Diederik,

On 5/16/25 6:36 PM, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun Apr 27, 2025 at 11:51 AM CEST, Algea Cao wrote:
>> When using HDMI PLL frequency division coefficient at 50.25MHz
>> that is calculated by rk_hdptx_phy_clk_pll_calc(), it fails to
>> get PHY LANE lock. Although the calculated values are within the
>> allowable range of PHY PLL configuration.
>>
>> In order to fix the PHY LANE lock error and provide the expected
>> 50.25MHz output, manually compute the required PHY PLL frequency
>> division coefficient and add it to ropll_tmds_cfg configuration
>> table.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Algea Cao <algea.cao@rock-chips.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
>>
>> ---
>>  drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c
>> index fe7c05748356..77236f012a1f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c
>> @@ -476,6 +476,8 @@ static const struct ropll_config ropll_tmds_cfg[] = {
>>  	  1, 1, 0, 0x20, 0x0c, 1, 0x0e, 0, 0, },
>>  	{ 650000, 162, 162, 1, 1, 11, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 54, 0, 16, 4, 1,
>>  	  1, 1, 0, 0x20, 0x0c, 1, 0x0e, 0, 0, },
>> +	{ 502500, 84, 84, 1, 1, 7, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 11, 1, 4, 5,
>> +	  4, 11, 1, 0, 0x20, 0x0c, 1, 0x0e, 0, 0, },
>>  	{ 337500, 0x70, 0x70, 1, 1, 0xf, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0x2, 0, 0x01, 5,
>>  	  1, 1, 1, 0, 0x20, 0x0c, 1, 0x0e, 0, 0, },
>>  	{ 400000, 100, 100, 1, 1, 11, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0x9, 0, 0x05, 0,
> 
> I found this patch in the 'fixes' branch in linux-phy:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/phy/linux-phy.git/commit/?h=fixes&id=f9475055b11c0c70979bd1667a76b2ebae638eb7
> 
> In the 'next' branch in linux-phy, I found this commit:
> 0edf9d2bb9b4 ("phy: rockchip: samsung-hdptx: Avoid Hz<->hHz unit conversion overhead")
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/phy/linux-phy.git/commit/?h=next&id=0edf9d2bb9b4ba7566dfdc7605883e04575129d9
> 
> Where the values in ropll_tmds_cfg are converted from hHz to Hz and the
> data type changes from u32 to unsigned long long.
> But AFAICT it does NOT convert this '502500' value, which IIUC means
> most values are in Hz, while this one is in hHz.
> 
> Am I missing something or should this new value also be converted?

Yeah, the conversion is necessary. FWIW, this has been already fixed by
Stephen Rothwell in linux-next, while Vinod will handle it before
sending the PR:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/aCXEOGUDcnaoGKWW@vaman/

Regards,
Cristian

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-16 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-27  9:51 [PATCH v2] phy: phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx: Fix PHY PLL output 50.25MHz error Algea Cao
2025-04-27  9:51 ` Algea Cao
2025-04-27  9:51 ` Algea Cao
2025-05-01 12:29 ` Heiko Stübner
2025-05-01 12:29   ` Heiko Stübner
2025-05-01 12:29   ` Heiko Stübner
2025-05-14 11:31 ` Vinod Koul
2025-05-14 11:31   ` Vinod Koul
2025-05-14 11:31   ` Vinod Koul
2025-05-16 15:36 ` Diederik de Haas
2025-05-16 15:36   ` Diederik de Haas
2025-05-16 15:36   ` Diederik de Haas
2025-05-16 16:02   ` Cristian Ciocaltea [this message]
2025-05-16 16:02     ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2025-05-16 16:02     ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2025-05-16 16:28     ` Diederik de Haas
2025-05-16 16:28       ` Diederik de Haas
2025-05-16 16:28       ` Diederik de Haas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9e29ef0e-c373-4f48-8f37-7111987d2dd0@collabora.com \
    --to=cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com \
    --cc=algea.cao@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=andy.yan@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=didi.debian@cknow.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.