* Re: RE: preparing toshiba_acpi driver release
From: Karol Kozimor @ 2004-01-27 3:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brown, Len
Cc: Ducrot Bruno, John Belmonte,
acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f
In-Reply-To: <BF1FE1855350A0479097B3A0D2A80EE0CC8A54-N2PTB0HCzHJF3Yvz3xaN/VDQ4js95KgL@public.gmane.org>
Thus wrote Brown, Len:
> I was thinking about ergonomics rather than power-savings -- though
> probably brightness control has some power savings benefits too -- maybe
> somebody on the list has numbers for screen power consumption?
Last time I checked it was about 6 W for my 15" display (100% brightness,
power consumption goes down linearly).
What I consider more important, is the ability to switch the LCD on / off
by demand -- unfortunately, DPMS is mostly unsupported on modern machines
and a generic approach (provided it works) could make a difference here.
Once I update the acpi4asus driver, I'll take a look on how those generic
methods to manipulate video work here and see where it gets me.
Best regards,
--
Karol 'sziwan' Kozimor
sziwan-DETuoxkZsSqrDJvtcaxF/A@public.gmane.org
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
^ permalink raw reply
* udevinfo query
From: Jon Smirl @ 2004-01-27 3:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hotplug
It would be nice to be able to query for the full path to the node. This would
make it easier to script things. Instead of "udevinfo -r" and "udevinfo -p
/class/dri/card0 -q name", I could just do something like "udevinfo -p
/class/dri/card0 -q fullname" and get back /udev/dri/card0
I tried "udevinfo -p /class/dri/card0 -q name" without udev running. It gives
the error "device not found in database". udevinfo -r returns "/udev/".
Shouldn't these messages be changed to indicate that udev is not mounted and
running?
==Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@yahoo.com
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: [uml-devel] Swapping directly to host swap area?
From: Dan Shearer @ 2004-01-27 3:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Stearns; +Cc: ML-uml-devel
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401251827030.2766-100000@sparrow>
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 06:34:12PM -0500, William Stearns wrote:
>
> When a VM needs to swap out, is there some way the UML kernel
> could send that sector directly to the host swap area instead of running
> its own swap?
But that would involve making it possible for an ordinary userspace
process (for example, /bin/ls) to affect what the VM is doing on the
host.
Jeff's /dev/anon and ubd=mmap is all about addressing your problem from
the point of view of memory utilisation. See
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/devanon.html
--
Dan Shearer
dan@shearer.org
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: FIX
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2004-01-27 2:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@; +Cc: davem, erik, netdev
In-Reply-To: <20040127.070142.93371828.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Em Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 07:01:42AM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ escreveu:
> In article <20040126.123042.104046496.davem@redhat.com> (at Mon, 26 Jan 2004 12:30:42 -0800 (PST)), "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> says:
>
> >
> > Ok, I've figured out the bug. Arnaldo only fixed one of the
> > two incorrect calls to sk_add_node() which should both be
> > __sk_add_node().
>
> Thanks you!
Great! Thanks!
- Arnaldo
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: Squid only on eth1
From: James Turnbull @ 2004-01-27 2:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-newbie
In-Reply-To: <4011C8740000069B@mail-bcm02.alestra.net.mx>
> Hi:
>
> I have 2 eth devices in my Linux box, I want that all squid traffic go
throw
> eth1 an not eth0, how do I configure it?
>
If they have seperate IP addresses you can force squid to use a specific IP
address in the squid.conf file. Look at the http_port config option and
specify an IP, i.e. http_port 10.0.0.5:3128
Regards
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: [Kernel-janitors] reviewing KJ patches
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2004-01-27 2:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel-janitors
In-Reply-To: <20040126163021.45208acc.rddunlap@osdl.org>
Em Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 04:30:21PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap escreveu:
>
> It sure would help if someone other than me was reviewing some
> kernel-janitors patches .... :(
>
> Yes, there is an occasional comment, usually about style.
> And those are fine, but patches often affect correctness also,
> and I don't see many comments about those.
Randy, I'm kinda busy lately with our upcoming Conectiva Linux 10 distro,
but I'll do my best to find time to help you, thank you for keeping up so
far!
- Arnaldo
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
^ permalink raw reply
* Synaptics problems with kernel 2.6.x
From: Richard Kuryk @ 2004-01-27 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
I have tried compiling two different kernel versions 2.6.1-mm5 and
2.6.2_rc1-love1 and both produce errors like:
Synaptics driver lost sync at byte X
psmouse.c: bad data from KBC - timeout
Synaptics driver resynced.
My machine is a :
Compaq presario 1692 - AMD k6-2 433mhz
ALi Corp. M1533 PCI to ISA Bridge
Output from dmesg:
Intel ISA PCIC probe: not found.
mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice
Failed to disable AUX port, but continuing anyway... Is this a SiS?
If AUX port is really absent please use the 'i8042.noaux' option.
serio: i8042 AUX port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12
Synaptics Touchpad, model: 1
Firmware: 4.6
Sensor: 15
new absolute packet format
Touchpad has extended capability bits
-> four buttons
-> multifinger detection
-> palm detection
input: SynPS/2 Synaptics TouchPad on isa0060/serio1
serio: i8042 KBD port at 0x60,0x64 irq 1
input: AT Translated Set 2 keyboard on isa0060/serio0
I have been reading prior messages so I know there are issues with power
management and ACPI and I have tried them on/off it doesn't really
help. I have also tried enabled the HPET Timer but I don't think my
machine has one. So far I have not been able to use X windows without
the mouse jumping every time I try and use the pad. 2.6.1-mm5 produced
a tad better results but still unusable.
I hope I included all the important info, but if you need additional
details please let me know what you need. Please CC me.
Thanks,
Rich
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: p4_clockmod or speedstep_ich | acpi?
From: Marcus Grando @ 2004-01-27 2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ducrot Bruno; +Cc: cpufreq
In-Reply-To: <20040124060321.GP25416@poupinou.org>
Hi,
But why my kernel show this messages, if celeron not support speedstep-ich?
cpufreq: P4/Xeon(TM) CPU On-Demand Clock Modulation available
cpufreq: Warning: Pentium 4-M detected. The speedstep-ich or acpi cpufreq
cpufreq: modules offers voltage scaling in addition of frequency
scaling. You
cpufreq: should use either one instead of p4-clockmod, if possible.
Regards
Ducrot Bruno wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 01:53:57AM -0200, Marcus Grando wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I have a toshiba satellite a10 127, and use p4 clockmod in cpufreq. I
>>look this kernel messages:
>>
>>cpufreq: P4/Xeon(TM) CPU On-Demand Clock Modulation available
>>cpufreq: Warning: Pentium 4-M detected. The speedstep-ich or acpi cpufreq
>>cpufreq: modules offers voltage scaling in addition of frequency
>>scaling. You
>>cpufreq: should use either one instead of p4-clockmod, if possible.
>>
>
>
> ...
>
>>CPU: After generic identify, caps: bfebf9ff 00000000 00000000 00000000
>>CPU: After vendor identify, caps: bfebf9ff 00000000 00000000 00000000
>>CPU: Trace cache: 12K uops, L1 D cache: 8K
>>CPU: L2 cache: 256K
>>CPU: After all inits, caps: bfebf9ff 00000000 00000000 00000080
>>CPU: Intel Mobile Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.00GHz stepping 09
>
> ^^^^^^^
> A celeron is not speedstep capable.
>
> Cheers,
>
--
Marcus Grando
Grupos Internet S/A
marcus(at)corp.grupos.com.br
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: New NUMA scheduler and hotplug CPU
From: Nick Piggin @ 2004-01-27 2:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: habanero; +Cc: Martin J. Bligh, Rusty Russell, linux-kernel
In-Reply-To: <200401262021.45885.habanero@us.ibm.com>
Andrew Theurer wrote:
>On Monday 26 January 2004 18:07, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>>>>Well OK, this would require a per architecture function to handle
>>>>CPU hotplug. It could possibly just default to arch_init_sched_domains,
>>>>and just completely reinitialise everything which would be the simplest.
>>>>
>>>Call me crazy, but why not let the topology be determined via userspace at
>>>a more appropriate time? When you hotplug, you tell it where in the
>>>scheduler to plug it. Have structures in the scheduler which represent
>>>the nodes-runqueues-cpus topology (in the past I tried a node/rq/cpu
>>>structs with simple pointers), but let the topology be built based on
>>>user's desires thru hotplug.
>>>
>>Well isn't userspace's idea of topology just what the kernel tells it?
>>I'm not sure what it would buy you... but I guess it wouldn't be too
>>much harder than doing it in kernel, just a matter of making the userspace
>>API.
>>
>
>Sort of, the cpus to node is pretty much what the kernel says it is, but the
>cpu to runqueue mapping IMO is not a clear cut thing.
>
>
But userspace still can't know more than the kernel tells it.
Apart from that, the SMT stuff in the sched domains patch means
SMT CPUs need not share runqueues.
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: New NUMA scheduler and hotplug CPU
From: Rusty Russell @ 2004-01-27 2:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin J. Bligh; +Cc: Nick Piggin, linux-kernel
In-Reply-To: <31860000.1075159471@flay>
In message <31860000.1075159471@flay> you write:
> > I think it mostly does a good job at making sure to only take
> > online cpus into account. If there are places where it doesn't
> > then it shouldn't be too hard to fix.
>
> It'd make the code a damned sight simpler and cleaner if you dropped
> all that stuff, and updated the structures when you hotplugged a CPU,
> which is really the only sensible way to do it anyway ...
No, actually, it wouldn't. Take it from someone who has actually
looked at the code with an eye to doing this.
Replacing static structures by dynamic ones for an architecture which
doesn't yet exist is NOT a good idea.
> For instance, if I remove cpu X, then bring back a new CPU on another node
> (or in another HT sibling pair) as CPU X, then you'll need to update all
> that stuff anyway. CPUs aren't fixed position in that map - the ordering
> handed out is arbitrary.
Sure, if they were stupid they'd do it this way.
If (when) an architecture has hotpluggable CPUs and NUMA
characteristics, they probably will have fixed CPU *slots*, and number
CPUs based on what slot they are in. Since the slots don't move, all
your fancy dynamic logic will be wasted.
When someone really has dynamic hotplug CPU capability with variable
attributes, *they* can code up the dynamic hierarchy. Because *they*
can actually test it!
> > I guess so, but you'd still need NR_CPUS to be >= that arbitrary
> > number.
>
> Yup ... but you don't have to enumerate all possible positions that way.
> See Linus' arguement re dynamic device numbers and ISCSI disks, etc.
> Same thing applies.
Crap. When all the fixed per-cpu arrays have been removed from the
kernel, come back and talk about instantiation and location of
arbitrary CPUS.
You're way overdesigning: have you been sharing food with the AIX guys?
Cheers!
Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: Firewall four nics, two separate routes
From: Alexis @ 2004-01-27 2:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
In-Reply-To: <002f01c3e47a$7a6f3f80$0200000a@heretic>
its too late at night, i drive so many kms today, i cant write.
this is the real message
think lan1 lan2 wan1 wan2
the firewall box, must have NO default route
ip rule add from lan1 lookup table 5
ip rule add from lan2 lookup table 6
ip route add default via wan1 table 5
ip route add default via wan2 table 6
sorry
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alexis" <alexis@attla.net.ar>
To: "netfilter" <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 11:08 PM
Subject: Re: Firewall four nics, two separate routes
> think lan1 lan2 wan1 wan2
>
> the firewall box, must have NO defaul route
>
> ip rule add from lan1 lookup table 5
> ip rule add from lan2 lookup table 6
> ip route add default via wan1 table 5
> ip route add default via wan1 table 6
>
> thats it.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ryan Johnson" <rjohnson@espgroup.net>
> To: <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 2:49 PM
> Subject: Firewall four nics, two separate routes
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have a firewall with four nics, two external nics with two public ips
and
> two internal nics with private ips (two different networks). What I would
> like to do is force all traffic from each internal network to its
> corresponding external nic. I believe the only solution to this is to use
> iproute2, but I have had to luck. So traffic from internal net1 will be
> routed out external nic1, then the other side, internal net2 will be
routed
> out the external nic2. Internal net1 traffic should never go out external
> nic2 and internal net2 traffic should never go out external nic1.
>
>
> Thank you in advance,
> Ryan
>
> Ryan Johnson
> Security Architect
> ESP Group
>
>
>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply
* C99 doesn't allow local scope variables?
From: tabris @ 2004-01-27 2:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-c-programming
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
simple C program
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
for (int i=0; i < 2; i++)
printf("crap\n");
};
[tabris@tabriel tmp]$ gcc test.c -o test
test.c: In function `main':
test.c:6: error: `for' loop initial declaration used outside C99 mode
What does that mean, and why am I not allowed to make a local scope variable
for a for{;;} loop?
works fine if i declare the variable outside the loop. But I swear I used to
do this with gcc 2.95.
- --
tabris
- -
Body by Nautilus, Brain by Mattel.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAFc1J1U5ZaPMbKQcRAiJyAJ4namXjJa9zd6Y/VGbR+Y5pyHVjUwCcCy4s
dW251Zxh2o3I97eabiisOMg=
=21yl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: Linux v2.6.2-rc2
From: Clemens Schwaighofer @ 2004-01-27 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds, Linux Kernel ML
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401251844440.32583@home.osdl.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Linus Torvalds wrote:
| It's being uploaded right now, and the BK trees should already
| be uptodate.
|
| There's a x86-64 update and IRDA updates here, and a number of USB storage
| fixes. The rest is pretty small. Full changelog from -rc1 appended.
| Tom Rini:
| o Elvis^H^H^H^H^HPaul has left the building
so, he left with the "I can enter The Plug & Play Setup" ;)
bad thing:
* Device Drivers >> Plug & Play Setup is no longer accessible [was in -rc1]
good thing:
my | \ on my japanese 106 key PS/2 keyboard works... without loading my
setkeys file. magic? santa?
- --
Clemens Schwaighofer - IT Engineer & System Administration
==========================================================
Tequila Japan, 6-17-2 Ginza Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-8167, JAPAN
Tel: +81-(0)3-3545-7703 Fax: +81-(0)3-3545-7343
http://www.tequila.jp
==========================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAFcwYjBz/yQjBxz8RAm90AKDkwcIHaydiP2ZWMQqZZ98Uf9rI/gCgqQxr
eD6/9RcY9fUJwVIx4X20Tyw=
=jYIq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: Squid only on eth1
From: Juan Facundo Suárez @ 2004-01-27 2:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-newbie list
In-Reply-To: <4011C8740000069B@mail-bcm02.alestra.net.mx>
i don't remember exactly how, but, i know that you can setup squid to
"listen" on specifics ips/ip-ranges/subnets. Many times i used webmin to
setup squid, if you need to set it up quick, it is a good choice.
have luck !
--
Facundo Suárez
Neuquén - Argentina
FDSoft
mail y jabber: faco@fdsoft.com.ar
facundo.suarez@ensi.com.ar
----- Original Message -----
From: <rgomez@bancomer.com>
To: "linux-newbie" <linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 3:01 PM
Subject: Squid only on eth1
| Hi:
|
| I have 2 eth devices in my Linux box, I want that all squid traffic go
throw
| eth1 an not eth0, how do I configure it?
|
| tks for your time...
|
| -
| To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
| the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
| More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
|
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: New NUMA scheduler and hotplug CPU
From: Andrew Theurer @ 2004-01-27 2:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Piggin; +Cc: Martin J. Bligh, Rusty Russell, linux-kernel
In-Reply-To: <4015ABA8.3090202@cyberone.com.au>
On Monday 26 January 2004 18:07, Nick Piggin wrote:
> >>Well OK, this would require a per architecture function to handle
> >>CPU hotplug. It could possibly just default to arch_init_sched_domains,
> >>and just completely reinitialise everything which would be the simplest.
> >
> >Call me crazy, but why not let the topology be determined via userspace at
> > a more appropriate time? When you hotplug, you tell it where in the
> > scheduler to plug it. Have structures in the scheduler which represent
> > the nodes-runqueues-cpus topology (in the past I tried a node/rq/cpu
> > structs with simple pointers), but let the topology be built based on
> > user's desires thru hotplug.
>
> Well isn't userspace's idea of topology just what the kernel tells it?
> I'm not sure what it would buy you... but I guess it wouldn't be too
> much harder than doing it in kernel, just a matter of making the userspace
> API.
Sort of, the cpus to node is pretty much what the kernel says it is, but the
cpu to runqueue mapping IMO is not a clear cut thing.
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: New NUMA scheduler and hotplug CPU
From: Andrew Theurer @ 2004-01-27 2:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin J. Bligh, Nick Piggin; +Cc: Rusty Russell, linux-kernel
In-Reply-To: <35060000.1075162177@flay>
On Monday 26 January 2004 18:09, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> > For example, you boot on just the boot cpu, which by default is in the
> > first node on the first runqueue. All other cpus, whether being "booted"
> > for the for the first time or hotplugged (maybe now there's really no
> > difference), the hotplugging tells where the cpu should be, in what node
> > and what runqueue. HT cpus work even better, because you can hotplug
> > siblings, once at a time if you wanted, to the same runqueue. Or you
> > have cpus sharing a die, same thing, lots of choices here. This removes
> > any per-arch updates to the kernel for things like scheduler topology,
> > and lets them go somewhere else more easily changes, like userspace.
>
> Ummm ... but *none* of that is dictated as policy stuff - it's all just
> the hardware layout of the machine. You cannot "decide" as the sysadmin
> which node a CPU is in, or which HT sibling it has. It's just there ;-)
> The only thing you could possibly dictate is the CPU number you want
> assigned to the new CPU, which frankly, I think is pointless - they're
> arbitrary tags, and always have been.
How many cpus share a runqueue IMO could be a policy thing. Some HT cpus may
be better sharing a runqueue where others (lots and lots of siblings in one
core) may not.
^ permalink raw reply
* udev dri directory rule
From: Jon Smirl @ 2004-01-27 2:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hotplug
Would this line:
KERNEL="card*", NAME="dri/card%n"
be better written as:
KERNEL="card*", NAME="dri/%k"
I noticed everything else is using %k
==Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@yahoo.com
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: [linux-lvm] Re: LVM2 + Linux 2.6.1 questions
From: Dale Gallagher @ 2004-01-27 2:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
In-Reply-To: <20040127001252.A21930@cs.mcgill.ca>
> Måns Rullgård <mru@kth.se> wrote:
> > I see the /dev/vg/link name.
> Navindra Umanee <navindra@cs.mcgill.ca> wrote:
> Mine shows /dev/mapper/vg-link too. I would definitely
> prefer
> /dev/vg/link because at least it's not implementation
> dependent... but
> I guess it's mostly an aesthetic thing.
>
> Any idea why yours is different? Different version of
> mount maybe?
> Using mount-2.11z here...
I have mount-2.12 and and df (coreutils) 5.0
Dale
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: [uPATCH] refuse plain ufs mount
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2004-01-27 2:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andries.Brouwer; +Cc: gotom, akpm, linux-kernel
In-Reply-To: <UTC200401270156.i0R1uiR06609.aeb@smtp.cwi.nl>
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:
>
> But you see, it wasn't the user at all, and it wasn't a ufs filesystem.
> It is kernel probing that causes error messages. That is unwanted.
> So, your version is wrong.
Yes.
However, I think the _real_ bug is that we have reiserfs near the tail of
filesystems to try.
The filesystems in fs/Makefile are listed in order of being probed, so I
really thing the real fix is to ignore the whole verbose thing entirely,
and just move reiserfs upwards.
Because if you actually get far enough that you try to mount UFS as your
root filesystem, you have other problems, and verbosity at boot is not
your real issue.
Can you test that alternate patch instead?
Linus
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: Firewall four nics, two separate routes
From: Alexis @ 2004-01-27 2:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
In-Reply-To: <KMS-272302109-548@mail.espgroup.net>
think lan1 lan2 wan1 wan2
the firewall box, must have NO defaul route
ip rule add from lan1 lookup table 5
ip rule add from lan2 lookup table 6
ip route add default via wan1 table 5
ip route add default via wan1 table 6
thats it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan Johnson" <rjohnson@espgroup.net>
To: <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 2:49 PM
Subject: Firewall four nics, two separate routes
Hi all,
I have a firewall with four nics, two external nics with two public ips and
two internal nics with private ips (two different networks). What I would
like to do is force all traffic from each internal network to its
corresponding external nic. I believe the only solution to this is to use
iproute2, but I have had to luck. So traffic from internal net1 will be
routed out external nic1, then the other side, internal net2 will be routed
out the external nic2. Internal net1 traffic should never go out external
nic2 and internal net2 traffic should never go out external nic1.
Thank you in advance,
Ryan
Ryan Johnson
Security Architect
ESP Group
^ permalink raw reply
* [LARTC] connbytes and connmark
From: Roy @ 2004-01-27 2:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
I need them both but POM fefuses to include them in kennes saying that they
are incompatible
what is that nonsense?
anybody have them both at once?
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: PPTP connection tracking and Poptop on same box
From: Harald Welte @ 2004-01-27 2:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Antony Stone; +Cc: netfilter, Carl Farrington
In-Reply-To: <200401190003.32170.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1822 bytes --]
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 12:03:32AM +0000, Antony Stone wrote:
> On Sunday 18 January 2004 11:47 pm, Carl Farrington wrote:
>
> > From: Antony Stone [mailto:Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk]
> >
> > > On Sunday 18 January 2004 11:00 pm, Carl Farrington wrote:
> > > > Does anybody know if there is a workaround for this problem? As soon
> > > > as I insmod ip_nat_pptp , poptop cannot accept any incoming pptp
> > > > connections.
> >
> > > Why do you want to use both of these on the same box?
>
> > Well, I want to do both. I am putting together a router/gateway box. It
> > performs NAT for all the workstations on the private side of the box
> > (hence the need for ip_nat_pptp since some workstations need to contact
> > outside pptp servers), and also allows access from the outside when
> > users are roaming (hence the need for poptop).
> >
> > Astaro Security Linux (www.astaro.com) is one product which achieves
> > this without problem using poptop, as is win2k rras.
>
> In that case your simplest solution might be to ask Astaro how they've done
> it. Their products are based on Linux / netfilter etc, so should be fully
> GPL.
If you read the PPTP helper sourcecode, you will find that I wrote it
for astaro. There's no black magic in ASL, they're using the same code
that is in patch-o-matic.
Carl: Are you sure you are running the latest pptp helper from
patch-o-matic (20031219) ?
> Antony
--
- Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org> http://www.netfilter.org/
============================================================================
"Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: [uPATCH] refuse plain ufs mount
From: Andries.Brouwer @ 2004-01-27 1:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andries.Brouwer, gotom; +Cc: akpm, linux-kernel, torvalds
From gotom@debian.or.jp Tue Jan 27 02:44:00 2004
I wonder this modification is really ok because user can't find why he
can't mount his ufs if he does not specify ufstype=. Putting only
one line is not acceptable for you?
But you see, it wasn't the user at all, and it wasn't a ufs filesystem.
It is kernel probing that causes error messages. That is unwanted.
So, your version is wrong.
If it is really very desirable to warn the user the condition if(!silent)
should be added.
But in my opinion such a warning is not desirable at all.
mount(8) and Documentation/filesystems/ufs.txt explain the details.
Andries
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: per-connection byte counts
From: Harald Welte @ 2004-01-27 1:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: wysiwyg, netfilter
In-Reply-To: <20040120221259.GA4354@glympton.airtime.co.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 782 bytes --]
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 10:12:59PM +0000, Adam Rice wrote:
> Quoting Nuno Miguel Pais Fernandes (npf@eurotux.com):
> > Try http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/connbytes/
> >
> > It works very well....
>
> Thanks, that's exactly what I wanted! Pity it seems to be unmaintained. Still,
> it's simple enough that that shouldn't matter for the time being.
erm, connbytes is even in patch-o-matic...
> Adam
--
- Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org> http://www.netfilter.org/
============================================================================
"Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: 2.6.2-rc1-mm1 pppd: page allocation failure (fwd)
From: haiquy @ 2004-01-27 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi,
Sorry for the delay but I have still unable to reproduce the bug when
when compiling use standard CFLAGS in the kernel Makefile.
Best regard,
Steve Kieu
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 12:38:41 +0000 (UTC)
From: haiquy@yahoo.com
Reply-To: s_kieu@hotmail.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 2.6.2-rc1-mm1 pppd: page allocation failure
Hi,
This did not happen with 2.6.1-mm4 . The system is still running fine
at the moment but I find several message in the dmesg output
pppd: page allocation failure. order:4, mode:0xd0
Call Trace: [<c01388f0>] [<c013895f>] [<c013b48c>] [<c013b79e>] [<c013bae4>] [<c01fc177>] [<c01f87b4>] [<c01f6bd1>] [<c014e742>] [<c015f299>] [<c02b2f67>]
pppd: page allocation failure. order:4, mode:0xd0
Call Trace: [<c01388f0>] [<c013895f>] [<c013b48c>] [<c013b79e>] [<c013bae4>] [<c01fc177>] [<c01f87b4>] [<c01f6bd1>] [<c014e742>] [<c015f299>] [<c02b2f67>]
pppd: page allocation failure. order:4, mode:0xd0
Call Trace: [<c01388f0>] [<c013895f>] [<c013b48c>] [<c013b79e>] [<c013bae4>] [<c01fc177>] [<c01f87b4>] [<c01f6bd1>] [<c014e742>] [<c015f299>] [<c02b2f67>]
If some one need further testing or information pls cc me.
Steve Kieu
^ permalink raw reply
page: next (older) | prev (newer) | latest
- recent:[subjects (threaded)|topics (new)|topics (active)]
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.