All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lirc@bartelmus.de (Christoph Bartelmus)
To: maximlevitsky@gmail.com
Cc: awalls@md.metrocast.net, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, lirc-list@lists.sourceforge.net,
	mchehab@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9 v2] IR: few fixes, additions and ENE driver
Date: 29 Jul 2010 21:35:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BTlNJJN3jFB@christoph> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1280424946.32069.11.camel@maxim-laptop

Hi!

Maxim Levitsky "maximlevitsky@gmail.com" wrote:
[...]
>>>>> Could you explain exactly how timeout reports work?
[...]
>>> So, timeout report is just another sample, with a mark attached, that
>>> this is last sample? right?
>>
>> No, a timeout report is just an additional hint for the decoder that a
>> specific amount of time has passed since the last pulse _now_.
>>
>> [...]
>>> In that case, lets do that this way:
>>>
>>> As soon as timeout is reached, I just send lirc the timeout report.
>>> Then next keypress will start with pulse.
>>
>> When timeout reports are enabled the sequence must be:
>> <pulse> <timeout> <space> <pulse>
>> where <timeout> is optional.
>>
>> lircd will not work when you leave out the space. It must know the exact
>> time between the pulses. Some hardware generates timeout reports that are
>> too short to distinguish between spaces that are so short that the next
>> sequence can be interpreted as a repeat or longer spaces which indicate
>> that this is a new key press.

> Let me give an example to see if I got that right.
>
>
> Suppose we have this sequence of reports from the driver:
>
> 500 (pulse)
> 200000 (timeout)
> 100000000 (space)
> 500 (pulse)
>
>
> Is that correct that time between first and second pulse is
> '100200000' ?

No, it's 100000000. The timeout is optional and just a hint to the decoder  
how much time has passed already since the last pulse. It does not change  
the meaning of the next space.

Christoph

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lirc@bartelmus.de (Christoph Bartelmus)
To: maximlevitsky@gmail.com
Cc: awalls@md.metrocast.net
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: lirc-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: mchehab@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9 v2] IR: few fixes, additions and ENE driver
Date: 29 Jul 2010 21:35:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BTlNJJN3jFB@christoph> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1280424946.32069.11.camel@maxim-laptop

Hi!

Maxim Levitsky "maximlevitsky@gmail.com" wrote:
[...]
>>>>> Could you explain exactly how timeout reports work?
[...]
>>> So, timeout report is just another sample, with a mark attached, that
>>> this is last sample? right?
>>
>> No, a timeout report is just an additional hint for the decoder that a
>> specific amount of time has passed since the last pulse _now_.
>>
>> [...]
>>> In that case, lets do that this way:
>>>
>>> As soon as timeout is reached, I just send lirc the timeout report.
>>> Then next keypress will start with pulse.
>>
>> When timeout reports are enabled the sequence must be:
>> <pulse> <timeout> <space> <pulse>
>> where <timeout> is optional.
>>
>> lircd will not work when you leave out the space. It must know the exact
>> time between the pulses. Some hardware generates timeout reports that are
>> too short to distinguish between spaces that are so short that the next
>> sequence can be interpreted as a repeat or longer spaces which indicate
>> that this is a new key press.

> Let me give an example to see if I got that right.
>
>
> Suppose we have this sequence of reports from the driver:
>
> 500 (pulse)
> 200000 (timeout)
> 100000000 (space)
> 500 (pulse)
>
>
> Is that correct that time between first and second pulse is
> '100200000' ?

No, it's 100000000. The timeout is optional and just a hint to the decoder  
how much time has passed already since the last pulse. It does not change  
the meaning of the next space.

Christoph

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-29 19:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-28 23:40 (unknown), Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-28 23:40 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-28 23:40 ` [PATCH 1/9] IR: Kconfig fixes Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-28 23:40 ` [PATCH 2/9] IR: minor fixes: Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-28 23:40 ` [PATCH 3/9] IR: replace spinlock with mutex Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-28 23:40 ` [PATCH 4/9] IR: add helper function for hardware with small o/b buffer Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-28 23:40 ` [PATCH 5/9] IR: extend interfaces to support more device settings Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-29  7:25   ` Christoph Bartelmus
2010-07-29  7:25     ` Christoph Bartelmus
2010-07-29 15:27     ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-29 17:05       ` Christoph Bartelmus
2010-07-29 17:05         ` Christoph Bartelmus
2010-07-28 23:40 ` [PATCH 6/9] IR: Allow not to compile keymaps in Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-28 23:40 ` [PATCH 7/9] IR: report unknown scancodes the in-kernel decoders found Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-28 23:40 ` [PATCH 8/9] STAGING: remove lirc_ene0100 driver Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-28 23:40 ` [PATCH 9/9] IR: Port ene driver to new IR subsystem and enable it Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-29  3:52 ` [PATCH 0/9 v2] IR: few fixes, additions and ENE driver Jarod Wilson
2010-07-29 15:30   ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-29 15:26     ` Jarod Wilson
2010-07-29  7:23 ` <kein Betreff> Christoph Bartelmus
2010-07-29  7:23   ` Christoph Bartelmus
2010-07-29 14:41   ` [PATCH 0/9 v2] IR: few fixes, additions and ENE driver Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-29 15:38     ` Andy Walls
2010-07-29 16:26       ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-29 16:58         ` Andy Walls
2010-07-29 17:15         ` Christoph Bartelmus
2010-07-29 17:15           ` Christoph Bartelmus
2010-07-29 17:35           ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-29 19:35             ` Christoph Bartelmus [this message]
2010-07-29 19:35               ` Christoph Bartelmus
2010-07-29 20:04               ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-29 21:28                 ` Jarod Wilson
2010-07-29 21:57                   ` Jarod Wilson
2010-07-29 22:07                     ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-29 22:24                       ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-30  2:03           ` Andy Walls
2010-07-29 17:17       ` Christoph Bartelmus
2010-07-29 17:17         ` Christoph Bartelmus
2010-07-29 16:58     ` Christoph Bartelmus
2010-07-29 16:58       ` Christoph Bartelmus
2010-07-29 17:43       ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-29 19:42         ` Christoph Bartelmus
2010-07-29 19:42           ` Christoph Bartelmus
2010-07-29 19:58           ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-29 19:21       ` Jarod Wilson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-30  2:17 Maxim Levitsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BTlNJJN3jFB@christoph \
    --to=lirc@bartelmus.de \
    --cc=awalls@md.metrocast.net \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lirc-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.