Re: [PATCH] Consolidate shared code between enic and fnic drivers.

[Scott Feldman <scofeldm@cisco.com>]

On 6/18/09 10:03 AM, "Mike Christie" <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu> wrote:

> Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> Hmm. Seeing that we're getting more and more of these type of drivers
>> (cf bnx2 / bnx2i / cnic, enic / fnic, and at least one other in the pipe)
>> one does wonder whether we should establish a separate directory for
>> these kind of things.
>> drivers/virtual or drivers/shared springs to mind.
>> 
>> Having them in the network directory is probably not the
>> correct choice.
>> 
> 
> I think it might sometimes. I am not sure though. I think we have two
> models. One where this common/lib/helper/shim module requires a net
> driver/netdev and one where it does not.
> 
> I think vnic should go in a new dir. fnic does not require enic to
> interact with hardare. It only needs the vnic module and vnic module
> should not need the enic one. The fnic module does not interact with the
> network layer's net_device.

I wanted to break vnic out into a new dir, but I couldn't figure out where
this new dir lives.  I considered drivers/net/vnic, drivers/net/enic/vnic,
and drivers/vnic.  But none seemed right so I just left the vnic files in
the enic dir and built two modules there.  The fnic linkage is awkward, but
it works.  I like Hannes suggestion of drivers/shared/vnic (or
drivers/shared/cisco_vnic per Ben), especially if there are other drivers in
the tree that could use the drivers/shared dir today.

-scott