All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>
To: "Eliot Courtney" <ecourtney@nvidia.com>
Cc: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>,
	Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>, Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>,
	nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
	Zhi Wang <zhiw@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] gpu: nova-core: gsp: add mutex locking to Cmdq
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2026 16:58:36 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DGSZKLIZVKH5.39822P7Y85PUA@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DGSU8PPHDH66.1QQ6N7H7IMP7W@nvidia.com>

On Tue Mar 3, 2026 at 12:47 PM JST, Eliot Courtney wrote:
> On Tue Mar 3, 2026 at 2:36 AM JST, Gary Guo wrote:
>>> +impl CmdqInner {
>>>      /// Sends `command` to the GSP, without splitting it.
>>>      ///
>>>      /// # Errors
>>> @@ -540,7 +493,7 @@ fn notify_gsp(bar: &Bar0) {
>>>      ///   written to by its [`CommandToGsp::init_variable_payload`] method.
>>>      ///
>>>      /// Error codes returned by the command initializers are propagated as-is.
>>> -    fn send_single_command<M>(&mut self, bar: &Bar0, command: M) -> Result
>>> +    fn send_single_command<M>(&mut self, dev: &device::Device, bar: &Bar0, command: M) -> Result
>>
>> Any reason that the `dev` is passed in everything instead of just have it be
>> part of `CmdqInner`?
>>
>> It appears that the `Cmdq` methods don't actually use it apart from passing it
>> to `CmdqInner`.
>
> Not a strong reason - I originally thought it would be a bit nicer if
> CmdqInner only contains what we actually want to lock on. But I think
> this way is good too, so I will update it. Thanks~

Right, when the only purpose of passing the `Device` is to print log
messages, we prefer to store a reference to it to make the API simpler -
other parts of Nova do that.

If we require a bound device, that's another story and in this case it
is (so far) passed as an argument.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>
To: "Eliot Courtney" <ecourtney@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
	"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
	"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>,
	<nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>, "Zhi Wang" <zhiw@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] gpu: nova-core: gsp: add mutex locking to Cmdq
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2026 16:58:36 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DGSZKLIZVKH5.39822P7Y85PUA@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DGSU8PPHDH66.1QQ6N7H7IMP7W@nvidia.com>

On Tue Mar 3, 2026 at 12:47 PM JST, Eliot Courtney wrote:
> On Tue Mar 3, 2026 at 2:36 AM JST, Gary Guo wrote:
>>> +impl CmdqInner {
>>>      /// Sends `command` to the GSP, without splitting it.
>>>      ///
>>>      /// # Errors
>>> @@ -540,7 +493,7 @@ fn notify_gsp(bar: &Bar0) {
>>>      ///   written to by its [`CommandToGsp::init_variable_payload`] method.
>>>      ///
>>>      /// Error codes returned by the command initializers are propagated as-is.
>>> -    fn send_single_command<M>(&mut self, bar: &Bar0, command: M) -> Result
>>> +    fn send_single_command<M>(&mut self, dev: &device::Device, bar: &Bar0, command: M) -> Result
>>
>> Any reason that the `dev` is passed in everything instead of just have it be
>> part of `CmdqInner`?
>>
>> It appears that the `Cmdq` methods don't actually use it apart from passing it
>> to `CmdqInner`.
>
> Not a strong reason - I originally thought it would be a bit nicer if
> CmdqInner only contains what we actually want to lock on. But I think
> this way is good too, so I will update it. Thanks~

Right, when the only purpose of passing the `Device` is to print log
messages, we prefer to store a reference to it to make the API simpler -
other parts of Nova do that.

If we require a bound device, that's another story and in this case it
is (so far) passed as an argument.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-03  7:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-26 14:50 [PATCH v2 0/4] gpu: nova-core: gsp: add locking to Cmdq Eliot Courtney
2026-02-26 14:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] gpu: nova-core: gsp: fix stale doc comments on command queue methods Eliot Courtney
2026-02-26 14:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] gpu: nova-core: gsp: add sync and async command queue API to `Cmdq` Eliot Courtney
2026-02-28  6:11   ` John Hubbard
2026-03-02  2:22     ` Eliot Courtney
2026-03-02  2:22       ` Eliot Courtney
2026-03-02  2:44       ` John Hubbard
2026-03-02  3:03       ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-03-02  3:03         ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-03-02  3:08         ` John Hubbard
2026-03-02  3:08           ` John Hubbard
2026-03-02  4:42           ` Eliot Courtney
2026-03-02  4:42             ` Eliot Courtney
2026-03-02  5:31             ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-03-02  5:31               ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-03-02 17:26         ` Gary Guo
2026-03-02 17:26           ` Gary Guo
2026-03-02 12:28     ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-03-02 12:28       ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-03-02 18:03       ` John Hubbard
2026-03-02 18:03         ` John Hubbard
2026-03-03  2:46       ` Eliot Courtney
2026-03-03  2:46         ` Eliot Courtney
2026-02-26 14:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] gpu: nova-core: gsp: make `Cmdq` a pinned type Eliot Courtney
2026-03-02 17:33   ` Gary Guo
2026-03-02 17:33     ` Gary Guo
2026-03-03  3:42     ` Eliot Courtney
2026-03-03  3:42       ` Eliot Courtney
2026-02-26 14:50 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] gpu: nova-core: gsp: add mutex locking to Cmdq Eliot Courtney
2026-03-02 17:36   ` Gary Guo
2026-03-02 17:36     ` Gary Guo
2026-03-03  3:47     ` Eliot Courtney
2026-03-03  3:47       ` Eliot Courtney
2026-03-03  7:58       ` Alexandre Courbot [this message]
2026-03-03  7:58         ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-02-26 18:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] gpu: nova-core: gsp: add " Zhi Wang
2026-02-26 18:48   ` Zhi Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DGSZKLIZVKH5.39822P7Y85PUA@nvidia.com \
    --to=acourbot@nvidia.com \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ecourtney@nvidia.com \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lossin@kernel.org \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.