From: "Matt Hunter" <m@lfurio.us>
To: "Patrick Steinhardt" <ps@pks.im>
Cc: <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Harald Nordgren" <haraldnordgren@gmail.com>,
"Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] init: show absolute path of (re)initialized repository
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 08:21:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DMC7P4CPEV2X.25XRRSBEZCFPH@lfurio.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <atr-Juww5KZN-ugM@pks.im>
On Fri Oct 23, 2026 at 2:26 AM EDT, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2026 at 08:06:32AM -0400, Matt Hunter wrote:
>>
>> +test_expect_success 'init shows absolute path to gitdir' '
>> + expect="$(pwd)/init-path" &&
>
> I don't think this extra variable buys us anything, so I'd just drop it.
>
>> + git init init-path >actual &&
>> + test_grep "$expect" actual
>> +'
>
> I would have tested for the whole message, which is short enough to be
> reasonable, I'd say.
I considered this. I decided on this simpler version since there are
4 possible messages that could appear at the end of git init. Do we
want separate tests/assertions to check all outputs
"Reinitialized existing shared Git repository in %s%s"
"Reinitialized existing Git repository in %s%s"
"Initialized empty shared Git repository in %s%s"
"Initialized empty Git repository in %s%s"
are as expected?
Furthermore, the final path element is configurable as well, though
should just be ".git" in the case of these tests. I figured, since the
actual breakage was about the appearance of the path, then I would just
test _that aspect_ of the output in this test.
How do we feel about this assertion
echo "Initialized empty Git repository in $(pwd)/init-path/.git/" >expect
test_cmp expect actual
which tests the whole message of just the default case? The unnecessary
variable you point out above is repurposed into a needed tmp file.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-23 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-20 5:38 [PATCH] init: show absolute path of (re)initialized repository Matt Hunter
2026-10-20 6:55 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-20 9:13 ` Matt Hunter
2026-10-20 12:14 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-20 12:37 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-20 14:37 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-20 15:32 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-20 16:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-22 12:06 ` [PATCH v2] " Matt Hunter
2026-10-23 6:26 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-23 12:21 ` Matt Hunter [this message]
2026-10-26 7:01 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-28 5:16 ` [PATCH v3] " Matt Hunter
2026-10-28 7:03 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-28 15:59 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DMC7P4CPEV2X.25XRRSBEZCFPH@lfurio.us \
--to=m@lfurio.us \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=haraldnordgren@gmail.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.