All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: khali@linux-fr.org (Jean Delvare)
To: salahx@yahoo.com
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	LM Sensors <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
Subject: [lm-sensors] Re: I2C block reads with i2c-viapro: testers wanted
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:15:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <OlUL6TaR.1123668419.1485260.khali@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42F95E9E.90204@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050809231328.0726537b.khali@linux-fr.org>


Hi Salah,

[Salah Coronya]
> I have a VT8235 chipset, I applied the patch to my kernel
> (2.6.12-gentoo-r6), compared the "before" and "after" eeproms in /sys
> with diff and they are the same.

Beware that eeprom files are binary files, so "diff" might not be the
more suitable tool for the job. "cmp" would probably do better.
Nevertheless, I think I remember that diff can at least differenciate
between identical and different binary files, so your test must still be
valid.

> So it seems to work with VT8235.

Yes, it does. Antonino A. Daplas reported success on his VT8235 in
private as well, so I am now confident that this chip is OK. The
question remains for VT82C686A and B though.

Thanks for your help!
--
Jean Delvare

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Jean Delvare" <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: salahx@yahoo.com
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	LM Sensors <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
Subject: Re: I2C block reads with i2c-viapro: testers wanted
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:06:59 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <OlUL6TaR.1123668419.1485260.khali@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42F95E9E.90204@yahoo.com>


Hi Salah,

[Salah Coronya]
> I have a VT8235 chipset, I applied the patch to my kernel
> (2.6.12-gentoo-r6), compared the "before" and "after" eeproms in /sys
> with diff and they are the same.

Beware that eeprom files are binary files, so "diff" might not be the
more suitable tool for the job. "cmp" would probably do better.
Nevertheless, I think I remember that diff can at least differenciate
between identical and different binary files, so your test must still be
valid.

> So it seems to work with VT8235.

Yes, it does. Antonino A. Daplas reported success on his VT8235 in
private as well, so I am now confident that this chip is OK. The
question remains for VT82C686A and B though.

Thanks for your help!
--
Jean Delvare

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-08-10 12:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-10  1:55 I2C block reads with i2c-viapro: testers wanted Salah Coronya
2005-08-10  5:56 ` [lm-sensors] " Salah Coronya
2005-08-10 10:06 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2005-08-10 12:15   ` Jean Delvare
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-11 18:30 Nick Warne
2005-08-09 21:13 Jean Delvare
2005-08-09 23:13 ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2005-08-10 20:31 ` Hinko Kocevar
2005-08-10 22:32   ` [lm-sensors] " Hinko Kocevar
2005-08-10 21:06   ` Jean Delvare
2005-08-10 23:06     ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2005-08-10 22:23     ` Martin Drab
2005-08-11  0:25       ` Martin Drab
2005-08-11 17:12       ` Jean Delvare
2005-08-11 19:12         ` Jean Delvare
2005-08-10 23:13     ` Hinko Kocevar
2005-08-11  1:13       ` [lm-sensors] " Hinko Kocevar
2005-08-11 16:56       ` Jean Delvare
2005-08-11 18:56         ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2005-08-11 19:13         ` Krzysztof Halasa
2005-08-11 21:14           ` [lm-sensors] " Krzysztof Halasa
2005-08-11 19:59           ` Jean Delvare
2005-08-11 21:59             ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2005-08-11 21:39             ` Krzysztof Halasa
2005-08-11 23:40               ` [lm-sensors] " Krzysztof Halasa
2005-08-11 21:49               ` Jean Delvare
2005-08-11 23:49                 ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2005-08-11 22:08                 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2005-08-12  0:08                   ` [lm-sensors] " Krzysztof Halasa
2005-08-12  6:26                   ` Jean Delvare
2005-08-12  8:26                     ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2005-08-12 15:29                     ` Krzysztof Halasa
2005-08-12 17:30                       ` [lm-sensors] " Krzysztof Halasa
2005-08-12 17:58                       ` Jean Delvare
2005-08-12 19:58                         ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2005-08-12  1:07 ` [lm-sensors] " Mark M. Hoffman
2005-08-12  3:08   ` Mark M. Hoffman
2005-08-12  6:02   ` Jean Delvare
2005-08-12  8:02     ` Jean Delvare
2005-08-13  4:28 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2005-08-13  8:46 ` Jean Delvare

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=OlUL6TaR.1123668419.1485260.khali@localhost \
    --to=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
    --cc=salahx@yahoo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.