All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"David P. Quigley" <dpquigl@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	casey@schaufler-ca.com, chrisw@sous-sol.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] LSM/SELinux: inode_{get,set}secctx hooks to access LSM security context information.
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 01:25:36 +1100 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Xine.LNX.4.64.0803070124160.2139@us.intercode.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080306140713.GA20087@infradead.org>

On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> Ok, this makes a lot more sense.  These defintively should be different
> hooks in that case, and no matter what name they have (no good ideas
> from me either currently)

Perhaps setsecctx and storesecctx ? 



-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"David P. Quigley" <dpquigl@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	casey@schaufler-ca.com, chrisw@sous-sol.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] LSM/SELinux: inode_{get,set}secctx hooks to access LSM security context information.
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 01:25:36 +1100 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Xine.LNX.4.64.0803070124160.2139@us.intercode.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080306140713.GA20087@infradead.org>

On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> Ok, this makes a lot more sense.  These defintively should be different
> hooks in that case, and no matter what name they have (no good ideas
> from me either currently)

Perhaps setsecctx and storesecctx ? 



-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-06 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-05 18:54 [RFC]Introduce generalized hooks for getting and setting inode secctx David P. Quigley
2008-03-05 18:54 ` David P. Quigley
2008-03-05 18:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] VFS: Factor out part of vfs_setxattr so it can be called from the SELinux hook for inode_setsecctx David P. Quigley
2008-03-05 18:54   ` David P. Quigley
2008-03-06 12:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-03-06 16:47     ` Dave Quigley
2008-03-06 16:47       ` Dave Quigley
2008-03-07 10:05       ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-03-07 16:10         ` Dave Quigley
2008-03-07 16:10           ` Dave Quigley
2008-03-07 17:11           ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-07 17:11             ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-07 17:37             ` Dave Quigley
2008-03-07 17:37               ` Dave Quigley
2008-03-07 18:14               ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-07 18:14                 ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-07 18:17                 ` Stephen Smalley
2008-03-07 18:17                   ` Stephen Smalley
2008-03-07 18:49                   ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-07 18:49                     ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-07 19:17                     ` Stephen Smalley
2008-03-07 19:17                       ` Stephen Smalley
2008-03-07 19:48                       ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-07 19:48                         ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-07 20:05                         ` Stephen Smalley
2008-03-07 20:05                           ` Stephen Smalley
2008-03-07 21:13                           ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-07 21:13                             ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-10 12:37                             ` Stephen Smalley
2008-03-10 12:37                               ` Stephen Smalley
2008-03-07 20:28                         ` Chris Wright
2008-03-07 20:28                           ` Chris Wright
2008-03-05 18:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] LSM/SELinux: inode_{get,set}secctx hooks to access LSM security context information David P. Quigley
2008-03-05 18:54   ` David P. Quigley
2008-03-05 20:45   ` Paul Moore
2008-03-05 20:45     ` Paul Moore
2008-03-05 20:54     ` Stephen Smalley
2008-03-05 20:54       ` Stephen Smalley
2008-03-05 22:28   ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-05 22:28     ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-06 12:30   ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-03-06 13:50     ` Stephen Smalley
2008-03-06 13:50       ` Stephen Smalley
2008-03-06 13:54       ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-03-06 14:05         ` Stephen Smalley
2008-03-06 14:05           ` Stephen Smalley
2008-03-06 14:07           ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-03-06 14:25             ` James Morris [this message]
2008-03-06 14:25               ` James Morris
2008-03-06 14:48               ` Stephen Smalley
2008-03-06 14:48                 ` Stephen Smalley
2008-03-06 17:13                 ` Dave Quigley
2008-03-06 17:13                   ` Dave Quigley
2008-03-07 10:03                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-03-07 16:06                     ` Dave Quigley
2008-03-07 16:06                       ` Dave Quigley
2008-03-07 16:54                       ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-03-07 17:30                         ` Dave Quigley
2008-03-07 17:30                           ` Dave Quigley
2008-03-07 20:24                           ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-03-07 21:07                             ` Dave Quigley
2008-03-07 21:07                               ` Dave Quigley
2008-03-07 21:46                               ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-03-08  0:24                                 ` Brad Boyer
2008-03-07 21:23                       ` Dave Quigley
2008-03-07 21:23                         ` Dave Quigley
2008-03-08 11:49                         ` Christoph Hellwig
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-18 18:57 [RFC]Introduce generalized hooks for getting and setting inode secctx v3 David P. Quigley
2008-03-18 18:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] LSM/SELinux: inode_{get,set}secctx hooks to access LSM security context information David P. Quigley
2008-03-18 18:57   ` David P. Quigley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Xine.LNX.4.64.0803070124160.2139@us.intercode.com.au \
    --to=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=dpquigl@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.