From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To: kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/7] RISC-V: Detect AIA CSRs from ISA string
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 10:41:14 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/Sfpb2c/LS0LCiA@wendy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEg0e7hRjMSgYZbPTQztbQ3bGZf-r8wAfCK5ZnDXOcx27HcTCA@mail.gmail.com>
Hey Christoph,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 08:12:58AM +0100, Christoph M?llner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The RISC-V Architectural Review Committee has discussed the concerns
> regarding the non-ratified chapters in the AIA specification.
Thanks for the update!
> Here is the relevant quote from the meeting minutes:
> """
> Although the Advanced Interrupt Architecture (AIA) has already passed
> Architecture Review (with a minor edit still pending), the committee
> has some suggestions about its final steps to ratification, to avoid
> the AIA document having a mixture of ratified and non-ratified content:
> - The AIA document's remaining draft chapter on the Duo-PLIC, which is
> not currently on a path to ratification, can be removed to a separate
> document.
That sounds promising...
> - Ratification of the full AIA (without Duo-PLIC) can be postponed to
> coincide with ratification of the IOMMU specification, given that
> the latter is now expected in a reasonable time, and the AIA's last
> chapter concerning IOMMUs is already scheduled to go through public
> review and be ratified only together with the IOMMU specification.
> """
...and so does this. AIA stuff's acceptability only depending on the
IOMMU spec's freeze (and thus Chapter 9's) seems like a vast improvement
on the status quo to me!
> The full meeting minutes can be found here:
> https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-chairs/message/1381
This link is non functional unfortunately :/
Cheers,
Conor.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kvm-riscv/attachments/20230221/5b60c2f5/attachment-0001.sig>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To: "Christoph Müllner" <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, <apatel@ventanamicro.com>,
<pbonzini@redhat.com>, <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
<ajones@ventanamicro.com>, <anup@brainfault.org>,
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] RISC-V: Detect AIA CSRs from ISA string
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 10:40:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/Sfpb2c/LS0LCiA@wendy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEg0e7hRjMSgYZbPTQztbQ3bGZf-r8wAfCK5ZnDXOcx27HcTCA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1532 bytes --]
Hey Christoph,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 08:12:58AM +0100, Christoph Müllner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The RISC-V Architectural Review Committee has discussed the concerns
> regarding the non-ratified chapters in the AIA specification.
Thanks for the update!
> Here is the relevant quote from the meeting minutes:
> """
> Although the Advanced Interrupt Architecture (AIA) has already passed
> Architecture Review (with a minor edit still pending), the committee
> has some suggestions about its final steps to ratification, to avoid
> the AIA document having a mixture of ratified and non-ratified content:
> - The AIA document's remaining draft chapter on the Duo-PLIC, which is
> not currently on a path to ratification, can be removed to a separate
> document.
That sounds promising...
> - Ratification of the full AIA (without Duo-PLIC) can be postponed to
> coincide with ratification of the IOMMU specification, given that
> the latter is now expected in a reasonable time, and the AIA's last
> chapter concerning IOMMUs is already scheduled to go through public
> review and be ratified only together with the IOMMU specification.
> """
...and so does this. AIA stuff's acceptability only depending on the
IOMMU spec's freeze (and thus Chapter 9's) seems like a vast improvement
on the status quo to me!
> The full meeting minutes can be found here:
> https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-chairs/message/1381
This link is non functional unfortunately :/
Cheers,
Conor.
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To: "Christoph Müllner" <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, <apatel@ventanamicro.com>,
<pbonzini@redhat.com>, <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
<ajones@ventanamicro.com>, <anup@brainfault.org>,
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] RISC-V: Detect AIA CSRs from ISA string
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 10:40:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/Sfpb2c/LS0LCiA@wendy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEg0e7hRjMSgYZbPTQztbQ3bGZf-r8wAfCK5ZnDXOcx27HcTCA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1532 bytes --]
Hey Christoph,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 08:12:58AM +0100, Christoph Müllner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The RISC-V Architectural Review Committee has discussed the concerns
> regarding the non-ratified chapters in the AIA specification.
Thanks for the update!
> Here is the relevant quote from the meeting minutes:
> """
> Although the Advanced Interrupt Architecture (AIA) has already passed
> Architecture Review (with a minor edit still pending), the committee
> has some suggestions about its final steps to ratification, to avoid
> the AIA document having a mixture of ratified and non-ratified content:
> - The AIA document's remaining draft chapter on the Duo-PLIC, which is
> not currently on a path to ratification, can be removed to a separate
> document.
That sounds promising...
> - Ratification of the full AIA (without Duo-PLIC) can be postponed to
> coincide with ratification of the IOMMU specification, given that
> the latter is now expected in a reasonable time, and the AIA's last
> chapter concerning IOMMUs is already scheduled to go through public
> review and be ratified only together with the IOMMU specification.
> """
...and so does this. AIA stuff's acceptability only depending on the
IOMMU spec's freeze (and thus Chapter 9's) seems like a vast improvement
on the status quo to me!
> The full meeting minutes can be found here:
> https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-chairs/message/1381
This link is non functional unfortunately :/
Cheers,
Conor.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-21 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 111+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-28 7:27 [PATCH v2 0/7] RISC-V KVM virtualize AIA CSRs Anup Patel
2023-01-28 7:27 ` Anup Patel
2023-01-28 7:27 ` Anup Patel
2023-01-28 7:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] RISC-V: Add AIA related CSR defines Anup Patel
2023-01-28 7:27 ` Anup Patel
2023-01-28 7:27 ` Anup Patel
2023-01-31 9:22 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-31 9:22 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-31 9:22 ` Atish Patra
2023-02-03 0:24 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-02-03 0:24 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-02-03 0:24 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-01-28 7:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] RISC-V: Detect AIA CSRs from ISA string Anup Patel
2023-01-28 7:27 ` Anup Patel
2023-01-28 7:27 ` Anup Patel
2023-01-31 9:25 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-31 9:25 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-31 9:25 ` Atish Patra
2023-02-03 0:24 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-02-03 0:24 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-02-03 0:24 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-02-03 12:01 ` Anup Patel
2023-02-03 12:01 ` Anup Patel
2023-02-03 12:01 ` Anup Patel
2023-02-07 18:05 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-07 18:05 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-07 18:05 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-07 18:09 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-07 18:09 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-07 18:09 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-07 18:15 ` Atish Patra
2023-02-07 18:15 ` Atish Patra
2023-02-07 18:15 ` Atish Patra
2023-02-07 20:39 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-07 20:39 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-07 20:39 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-08 3:54 ` Anup Patel
2023-02-08 3:54 ` Anup Patel
2023-02-08 3:54 ` Anup Patel
2023-02-08 12:57 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-08 12:57 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-08 12:57 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-08 14:57 ` Anup Patel
2023-02-08 14:57 ` Anup Patel
2023-02-08 14:57 ` Anup Patel
2023-02-09 23:31 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-09 23:31 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-09 23:31 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-08 3:06 ` Anup Patel
2023-02-08 3:06 ` Anup Patel
2023-02-08 3:06 ` Anup Patel
2023-02-15 15:41 ` Christoph Müllner
2023-02-15 15:41 ` Christoph Müllner
2023-02-15 15:41 ` Christoph Müllner
2023-02-21 7:12 ` Christoph Müllner
2023-02-21 7:12 ` Christoph Müllner
2023-02-21 7:12 ` Christoph Müllner
2023-02-21 10:40 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2023-02-21 10:41 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-21 10:40 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-21 10:51 ` Jessica Clarke
2023-02-21 10:51 ` Jessica Clarke
2023-02-21 10:51 ` Jessica Clarke
2023-02-21 10:59 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-21 11:00 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-21 10:59 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-21 11:03 ` Christoph Müllner
2023-02-21 11:03 ` Christoph Müllner
2023-02-21 11:03 ` Christoph Müllner
2023-02-21 11:22 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-21 11:22 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-21 11:22 ` Conor Dooley
2023-03-31 12:53 ` Anup Patel
2023-03-31 12:53 ` Anup Patel
2023-03-31 12:53 ` Anup Patel
2023-01-28 7:27 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] RISC-V: KVM: Drop the _MASK suffix from hgatp.VMID mask defines Anup Patel
2023-01-28 7:27 ` Anup Patel
2023-01-28 7:27 ` Anup Patel
2023-01-31 9:27 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-31 9:27 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-31 9:27 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-28 7:27 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] RISC-V: KVM: Initial skeletal support for AIA Anup Patel
2023-01-28 7:27 ` Anup Patel
2023-01-28 7:27 ` Anup Patel
2023-01-31 9:51 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-31 9:51 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-31 9:51 ` Atish Patra
2023-01-28 7:27 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] RISC-V: KVM: Add ONE_REG interface for AIA CSRs Anup Patel
2023-01-28 7:27 ` Anup Patel
2023-01-28 7:27 ` Anup Patel
2023-02-08 0:04 ` Atish Patra
2023-02-08 0:04 ` Atish Patra
2023-02-08 0:04 ` Atish Patra
2023-03-31 17:15 ` Anup Patel
2023-03-31 17:15 ` Anup Patel
2023-03-31 17:15 ` Anup Patel
2023-01-28 7:27 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] RISC-V: KVM: Virtualize per-HART " Anup Patel
2023-01-28 7:27 ` Anup Patel
2023-01-28 7:27 ` Anup Patel
2023-01-28 7:27 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] RISC-V: KVM: Implement guest external interrupt line management Anup Patel
2023-01-28 7:27 ` Anup Patel
2023-01-28 7:27 ` Anup Patel
2023-02-08 0:15 ` Atish Patra
2023-02-08 0:15 ` Atish Patra
2023-02-08 0:15 ` Atish Patra
2023-03-31 17:15 ` Anup Patel
2023-03-31 17:15 ` Anup Patel
2023-03-31 17:15 ` Anup Patel
2023-01-31 6:01 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] RISC-V KVM virtualize AIA CSRs Anup Patel
2023-01-31 6:01 ` Anup Patel
2023-01-31 6:01 ` Anup Patel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y/Sfpb2c/LS0LCiA@wendy \
--to=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.