Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] RISC-V: add Bitmanip/Scalar Crypto parsing from DT

[Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>]

Hey Hongren,

On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 02:46:01AM +0800, Hongren (Zenithal) Zheng wrote:
> This patch parses Zb/Zk related string from DT and
> output them in cpuinfo

Could you please wrap changelogs at 72 character rather than 50?

> 
> One thing worth noting is that if DT provides zk,
> all zbkb, zbkc, zbkx and zkn, zkr, zkt would be enabled.
> 
> Note that zk is a valid extension name and the current
> DT binding spec allows this.

Where is the "DT binding spec" for this?
At the time, IIRC, putting any multiletter extensions in a DT was
a violation of the dt-binding, so I am interested in seeing what spec
had covered this.

> This patch also changes the logical id of
> existing multi-letter extensions and adds a statement
> that instead of logical id compatibility, the order
> is needed.
> 
> There currently lacks a mechanism to merge them when
> producing cpuinfo. Namely if you provide a riscv,isa
> "rv64imafdc_zk_zks", the cpuinfo output would be
> "rv64imafdc_zbkb_zbkc_zbkx_zknd_zkne_zknh_zkr_zksed
> _zksh_zkt"
> 
> Tested-by: Jiatai He <jiatai2021@iscas.ac.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Hongren (Zenithal) Zheng <i@zenithal.me>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
>  arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c        | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> index 4e2486881840..02c454a12683 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> @@ -49,9 +49,27 @@ extern unsigned long elf_hwcap;
>   * RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX. 0-25 range is reserved for single letter
>   * extensions while all the multi-letter extensions should define the next
>   * available logical extension id.
> + *
> + * The order of them should be maintained according to the riscv-isa-manual.
> + * As this is an internal API, changing the id of one extension does
> + * not affect compatibility.

Hmm, not too sure about this. See 61a41d16ad20 ("RISC-V: Print SSTC in
canonical order"), where Palmer re-sorted another one of these internal
APIs (isa_ext_arr) in a different order to what it would appear you're
proposing here.

I am really really bad when it comes to specs, manuals etc - is there a
link to the specific part of the riscv-isa-manual that we can use here
for reference? Otherwise I'd much rather stick with what I **thought**
was the "canonical order", _Sfoo_Zfoo_Xfoo.

Or are these slightly different - and fit in the "Additional Standard
Extension Names" category rather than "Machine-level Instruction-Set
Extensions"?

The only ones I see pointed out in the current table [0] are Ztso,
Zicsr, Zifencei & Zam which is what I (maybe wrongly!!) assumed to be
the exceptions to the S before Z rule.

I tried to have a look in the "bitmanip-1.0.0" pdf at [2], but I don't
see it use the word "Standard" anywhere. As I already said, this stuff
confuses me no end so some clarification would be really helpful :)

The same applies to the crypto stuff.

In other news, since Palmer did do a re-order, and its been several
months - you'll need to rebase & re-submit anyway.

Thanks,
Conor.

0 - https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/blob/master/src/naming.tex#L132
1 - https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/blob/master/src/naming.tex#L182
2 - https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/releases/tag/1.0.0

>   */
>  enum riscv_isa_ext_id {
> -	RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCOFPMF = RISCV_ISA_EXT_BASE,
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBA = RISCV_ISA_EXT_BASE,
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB,
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBC,
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKB,
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKC,
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKX,
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBS,
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKND,
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKNE,
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKNH,
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKR,
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKSED,
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKSH,
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKT,
> +	RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCOFPMF,
>  	RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVPBMT,
>  	RISCV_ISA_EXT_ID_MAX = RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX,
>  };
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> index fba9e9f46a8c..d9ff9bff3d45 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -87,6 +87,20 @@ int riscv_of_parent_hartid(struct device_node *node)
>   *    extensions by an underscore.
>   */
>  static struct riscv_isa_ext_data isa_ext_arr[] = {
> +	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zba, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBA),
> +	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbb, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB),
> +	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbc, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBC),
> +	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbkb, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKB),
> +	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbkc, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKC),
> +	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbkx, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKX),
> +	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbs, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBS),
> +	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zknd, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKND),
> +	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zkne, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKNE),
> +	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zknh, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKNH),
> +	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zkr, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKR),
> +	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zksed, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKSED),
> +	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zksh, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKSH),
> +	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zkt, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKT),
>  	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(sscofpmf, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCOFPMF),
>  	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svpbmt, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVPBMT),
>  	__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA("", RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX),
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index a6f62a6d1edd..0c2638365ec2 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -199,6 +199,39 @@ void __init riscv_fill_hwcap(void)
>  			} else {
>  				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("sscofpmf", RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCOFPMF);
>  				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("svpbmt", RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVPBMT);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zba", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBA);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zbb", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zbc", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBC);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zbs", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBS);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zbkb", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKB);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zbkc", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKC);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zbks", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKX);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zknd", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKND);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zkne", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKNE);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zknh", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKNH);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zksed", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKSED);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zksh", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKSH);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zkr", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKR);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zkt", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKT);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zkn", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKB);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zkn", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKC);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zkn", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKX);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zkn", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKND);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zkn", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKNE);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zkn", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKNH);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zks", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKB);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zks", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKC);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zks", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKX);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zks", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKSED);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zks", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKSH);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zk", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKB);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zk", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKC);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zk", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKX);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zk", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKND);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zk", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKNE);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zk", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKNH);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zk", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKR);
> +				SET_ISA_EXT_MAP("zk", RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKT);
>  			}
>  #undef SET_ISA_EXT_MAP
>  		}
> -- 
> 2.35.1
>