All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: Disable single-step with correct KVM define
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 00:43:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3WDsIp6Jk5dVg0n@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221117002350.2178351-2-seanjc@google.com>

On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 12:23:49AM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Disable single-step by setting debug.control to KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE,
> not to SINGLE_STEP_DISABLE.  The latter is an arbitrary test enum that
> just happens to have the same value as KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE, and so
> effectively disables single-step debug.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Cc: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
> Fixes: b18e4d4aebdd ("KVM: arm64: selftests: Add a test case for KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP")
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>

--
Thanks,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: Disable single-step with correct KVM define
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 00:43:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3WDsIp6Jk5dVg0n@google.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20221117004328.UH5wdaDe6kyMDxUEZpjZ0XlMnbNhBG_MkDRiCV__RXc@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221117002350.2178351-2-seanjc@google.com>

On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 12:23:49AM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Disable single-step by setting debug.control to KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE,
> not to SINGLE_STEP_DISABLE.  The latter is an arbitrary test enum that
> just happens to have the same value as KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE, and so
> effectively disables single-step debug.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Cc: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
> Fixes: b18e4d4aebdd ("KVM: arm64: selftests: Add a test case for KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP")
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>

--
Thanks,
Oliver

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: Disable single-step with correct KVM define
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 00:43:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3WDsIp6Jk5dVg0n@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221117002350.2178351-2-seanjc@google.com>

On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 12:23:49AM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Disable single-step by setting debug.control to KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE,
> not to SINGLE_STEP_DISABLE.  The latter is an arbitrary test enum that
> just happens to have the same value as KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE, and so
> effectively disables single-step debug.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Cc: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
> Fixes: b18e4d4aebdd ("KVM: arm64: selftests: Add a test case for KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP")
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>

--
Thanks,
Oliver

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-17  0:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-17  0:23 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: Fixes for single-step test Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17  0:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17  0:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17  0:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: Disable single-step with correct KVM define Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17  0:23   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17  0:23   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17  0:43   ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2022-11-17  0:43     ` Oliver Upton
2022-11-17  0:43     ` Oliver Upton
2022-11-17  3:07   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-11-17  3:07     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-11-17  3:07     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-11-17  0:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: Disable single-step without relying on ucall() Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17  0:23   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17  0:23   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17  0:53   ` Oliver Upton
2022-11-17  0:53     ` Oliver Upton
2022-11-17  0:53     ` Oliver Upton
2022-11-17  1:20     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17  1:20       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17  1:20       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17 15:19       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17 15:19         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17 15:19         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17 22:32         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17 22:32           ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17 22:32           ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17  7:07   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-11-17  7:07     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-11-17  7:07     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-11-17 13:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: Fixes for single-step test Marc Zyngier
2022-11-17 13:52   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-17 13:52   ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y3WDsIp6Jk5dVg0n@google.com \
    --to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.