Re: [PATCH 2/7] hw/boards: Introduce 'kvm_supported' field to MachineClass

["Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>]

On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 12:44:23PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Introduce the 'kvm_supported' field to express whether
> a machine supports KVM acceleration or not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/hw/boards.h | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/hw/boards.h b/include/hw/boards.h
> index 68d3d10f6b0..0959aa743ee 100644
> --- a/include/hw/boards.h
> +++ b/include/hw/boards.h
> @@ -129,6 +129,8 @@ typedef struct {
>   *    Return the type of KVM corresponding to the kvm-type string option or
>   *    computed based on other criteria such as the host kernel capabilities
>   *    (which can't be negative), or -1 on error.
> + * @kvm_supported:
> + *    true if '-enable-kvm' option is supported and false otherwise.

Is the behaviour reported really related to KVM specifically, as opposed
to all hardware based virt backends ?

eg is it actually a case of some machine types being  "tcg_only" ?



Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|