From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: bkkarthik <bkkarthik@pesu.pes.edu>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
Anupama K Patil <anupamakpatil123@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: pnp: proc.c: Handle errors while attaching devices
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:26:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YIeSc1qePhuQ1XRK@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210426175031.w26ovnffjiow346h@burgerking>
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:20:32PM +0530, bkkarthik wrote:
> On 21/04/26 08:04AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 01:13:01AM +0530, Anupama K Patil wrote:
> > > isapnp_proc_init() does not look at the return value from
> > > isapnp_proc_attach_device(). Check for this return value in
> > > isapnp_proc_detach_device().
> > >
> > > Cleanup in isapnp_proc_detach_device and
> > > isapnp_proc_detach_bus() for cleanup.
> > >
> > > Changed sprintf() to the kernel-space function scnprintf() as it returns
> > > the actual number of bytes written.
> > >
> > > Removed unnecessary variables de, e of type 'struct proc_dir_entry' to
> > > save memory.
<...>
> > > +static int isapnp_proc_detach_device(struct pnp_dev *dev)
> > > +{
> > > + proc_remove(dev->procent);
> > > + dev->procent = NULL;
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int isapnp_proc_detach_bus(struct pnp_card *bus)
> > > +{
> > > + proc_remove(bus->procdir);
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> >
> > Please don't add one line functions that are called only once and have
> > return value that no one care about it.
>
> These were only intended for a clean-up job, the idea of this function came from how PCI handles procfs.
> Maybe those should be changed?
Probably, the CONFIG_PROC_FS around pci_proc_*() is not needed too.
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: bkkarthik <bkkarthik@pesu.pes.edu>
Cc: Anupama K Patil <anupamakpatil123@gmail.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: pnp: proc.c: Handle errors while attaching devices
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:26:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YIeSc1qePhuQ1XRK@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210426175031.w26ovnffjiow346h@burgerking>
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:20:32PM +0530, bkkarthik wrote:
> On 21/04/26 08:04AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 01:13:01AM +0530, Anupama K Patil wrote:
> > > isapnp_proc_init() does not look at the return value from
> > > isapnp_proc_attach_device(). Check for this return value in
> > > isapnp_proc_detach_device().
> > >
> > > Cleanup in isapnp_proc_detach_device and
> > > isapnp_proc_detach_bus() for cleanup.
> > >
> > > Changed sprintf() to the kernel-space function scnprintf() as it returns
> > > the actual number of bytes written.
> > >
> > > Removed unnecessary variables de, e of type 'struct proc_dir_entry' to
> > > save memory.
<...>
> > > +static int isapnp_proc_detach_device(struct pnp_dev *dev)
> > > +{
> > > + proc_remove(dev->procent);
> > > + dev->procent = NULL;
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int isapnp_proc_detach_bus(struct pnp_card *bus)
> > > +{
> > > + proc_remove(bus->procdir);
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> >
> > Please don't add one line functions that are called only once and have
> > return value that no one care about it.
>
> These were only intended for a clean-up job, the idea of this function came from how PCI handles procfs.
> Maybe those should be changed?
Probably, the CONFIG_PROC_FS around pci_proc_*() is not needed too.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-27 4:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-24 19:43 [PATCH] drivers: pnp: proc.c: Handle errors while attaching devices Anupama K Patil
2021-04-24 19:43 ` Anupama K Patil
2021-04-24 20:37 ` Valdis Klētnieks
2021-04-24 20:37 ` Valdis Klētnieks
2021-04-25 1:06 ` Barnabás Pőcze
2021-04-25 1:06 ` Barnabás Pőcze
2021-04-26 5:04 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-04-26 5:04 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-04-26 17:50 ` bkkarthik
2021-04-26 17:50 ` bkkarthik
2021-04-27 4:26 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2021-04-27 4:26 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-04-29 4:31 ` Valdis Klētnieks
2021-04-29 4:31 ` Valdis Klētnieks
2021-04-29 7:05 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-04-29 7:05 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-04-28 12:04 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2021-04-28 12:04 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2021-04-28 12:21 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-04-28 12:21 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-04-28 12:26 ` bkkarthik
2021-04-28 12:26 ` bkkarthik
2021-04-28 12:30 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2021-04-28 12:30 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2021-04-28 12:37 ` bkkarthik
2021-04-28 12:37 ` bkkarthik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YIeSc1qePhuQ1XRK@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=anupamakpatil123@gmail.com \
--cc=bkkarthik@pesu.pes.edu \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.