From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: support RO feature
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 06:58:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YK5UHr4fV1Hg8MoO@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <984caf0c-ddec-930a-cbc6-084c8a9b67e5@huawei.com>
On 05/26, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2021/5/22 3:02, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Given RO feature in superblock, we don't need to check provisioning/reserve
> > spaces and SSA area.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 ++
> > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 3 +++
> > fs/f2fs/super.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > index c0bead0df66a..2c6913261586 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ struct f2fs_mount_info {
> > #define F2FS_FEATURE_SB_CHKSUM 0x0800
> > #define F2FS_FEATURE_CASEFOLD 0x1000
> > #define F2FS_FEATURE_COMPRESSION 0x2000
> > +#define F2FS_FEATURE_RO 0x4000
> > #define __F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(raw_super, mask) \
> > ((raw_super->feature & cpu_to_le32(mask)) != 0)
> > @@ -939,6 +940,7 @@ static inline void set_new_dnode(struct dnode_of_data *dn, struct inode *inode,
> > #define NR_CURSEG_DATA_TYPE (3)
> > #define NR_CURSEG_NODE_TYPE (3)
> > #define NR_CURSEG_INMEM_TYPE (2)
> > +#define NR_CURSEG_RO_TYPE (2)
> > #define NR_CURSEG_PERSIST_TYPE (NR_CURSEG_DATA_TYPE + NR_CURSEG_NODE_TYPE)
> > #define NR_CURSEG_TYPE (NR_CURSEG_INMEM_TYPE + NR_CURSEG_PERSIST_TYPE)
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > index 8668df7870d0..67cec8f858a2 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > @@ -4674,6 +4674,9 @@ static int sanity_check_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > {
> > int i;
> > + if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi->raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_RO))
> > + return 0;
>
> We need to skip this sanity check because .next_blkoff may point to end position
> of image?
Since we only use hot data and node. Let me check them only.
>
> > +
> > /*
> > * In LFS/SSR curseg, .next_blkoff should point to an unused blkaddr;
> > * In LFS curseg, all blkaddr after .next_blkoff should be unused.
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > index b29de80ab60e..312bfab54693 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > @@ -1819,7 +1819,11 @@ static int f2fs_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct dentry *root)
> > static void default_options(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > {
> > /* init some FS parameters */
> > - F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs = NR_CURSEG_PERSIST_TYPE;
> > + if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi->raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_RO))
> > + F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs = NR_CURSEG_RO_TYPE;
> > + else
> > + F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs = NR_CURSEG_PERSIST_TYPE;
> > +
> > F2FS_OPTION(sbi).inline_xattr_size = DEFAULT_INLINE_XATTR_ADDRS;
> > F2FS_OPTION(sbi).whint_mode = WHINT_MODE_OFF;
> > F2FS_OPTION(sbi).alloc_mode = ALLOC_MODE_DEFAULT;
> > @@ -1994,6 +1998,11 @@ static int f2fs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
> > err = parse_options(sb, data, true);
> > if (err)
> > goto restore_opts;
> > +
> > + if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi->raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_RO) &&
> > + !(*flags & SB_RDONLY))
>
> err = -EROFS; ?
Done.
>
> > + goto restore_opts;
> > +
> > checkpoint_changed =
> > disable_checkpoint != test_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT);
> > @@ -3137,16 +3146,18 @@ int f2fs_sanity_check_ckpt(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > ovp_segments = le32_to_cpu(ckpt->overprov_segment_count);
> > reserved_segments = le32_to_cpu(ckpt->rsvd_segment_count);
> > + if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi->raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_RO))
> > + goto no_reserved;
> > if (unlikely(fsmeta < F2FS_MIN_META_SEGMENTS ||
> > ovp_segments == 0 || reserved_segments == 0)) {
> > f2fs_err(sbi, "Wrong layout: check mkfs.f2fs version");
> > return 1;
> > }
>
> Well, why not:
>
> if (!F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(, RO) && unlikely()) {
> }
Done.
>
> > -
> > +no_reserved:
> > user_block_count = le64_to_cpu(ckpt->user_block_count);
> > segment_count_main = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->segment_count_main);
> > log_blocks_per_seg = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->log_blocks_per_seg);
> > - if (!user_block_count || user_block_count >=
> > + if (!user_block_count || user_block_count >
>
> Does this change related to RO feature? if so, let's split condition for
> RO feature here?
Done.
>
> > segment_count_main << log_blocks_per_seg) {
> > f2fs_err(sbi, "Wrong user_block_count: %u",
> > user_block_count);
> > @@ -3175,6 +3186,10 @@ int f2fs_sanity_check_ckpt(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > if (le32_to_cpu(ckpt->cur_node_segno[i]) >= main_segs ||
> > le16_to_cpu(ckpt->cur_node_blkoff[i]) >= blocks_per_seg)
> > return 1;
> > +
> > + if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi->raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_RO))
> > + goto check_data;
> > +
> > for (j = i + 1; j < NR_CURSEG_NODE_TYPE; j++) {
> > if (le32_to_cpu(ckpt->cur_node_segno[i]) ==
> > le32_to_cpu(ckpt->cur_node_segno[j])) {
> > @@ -3185,10 +3200,15 @@ int f2fs_sanity_check_ckpt(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > +check_data:
> > for (i = 0; i < NR_CURSEG_DATA_TYPE; i++) {
> > if (le32_to_cpu(ckpt->cur_data_segno[i]) >= main_segs ||
> > le16_to_cpu(ckpt->cur_data_blkoff[i]) >= blocks_per_seg)
> > return 1;
> > +
> > + if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi->raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_RO))
> > + goto skip_cross;
> > +
> > for (j = i + 1; j < NR_CURSEG_DATA_TYPE; j++) {
> > if (le32_to_cpu(ckpt->cur_data_segno[i]) ==
> > le32_to_cpu(ckpt->cur_data_segno[j])) {
> > @@ -3210,7 +3230,7 @@ int f2fs_sanity_check_ckpt(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > -
> > +skip_cross:
> > sit_bitmap_size = le32_to_cpu(ckpt->sit_ver_bitmap_bytesize);
> > nat_bitmap_size = le32_to_cpu(ckpt->nat_ver_bitmap_bytesize);
> > @@ -3703,6 +3723,13 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> > if (err)
> > goto free_options;
> > + if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi->raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_RO) &&
> > + !f2fs_readonly(sbi->sb)) {
> > + f2fs_info(sbi, "Allow to mount readonly mode only");
> > + err = -EINVAL;
> > + goto free_options;
> > + }
>
> How about relocating this to parse_options() like other features did, then
> we don't need to handle this in both fill_super() and remount()?
Done. But not sure what you mean "we don't need to handle both".
Thanks,
>
> Thanks,
>
> > +
> > sb->s_maxbytes = max_file_blocks(NULL) <<
> > le32_to_cpu(raw_super->log_blocksize);
> > sb->s_max_links = F2FS_LINK_MAX;
> >
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: support RO feature
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 06:58:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YK5UHr4fV1Hg8MoO@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <984caf0c-ddec-930a-cbc6-084c8a9b67e5@huawei.com>
On 05/26, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2021/5/22 3:02, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Given RO feature in superblock, we don't need to check provisioning/reserve
> > spaces and SSA area.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 ++
> > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 3 +++
> > fs/f2fs/super.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > index c0bead0df66a..2c6913261586 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ struct f2fs_mount_info {
> > #define F2FS_FEATURE_SB_CHKSUM 0x0800
> > #define F2FS_FEATURE_CASEFOLD 0x1000
> > #define F2FS_FEATURE_COMPRESSION 0x2000
> > +#define F2FS_FEATURE_RO 0x4000
> > #define __F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(raw_super, mask) \
> > ((raw_super->feature & cpu_to_le32(mask)) != 0)
> > @@ -939,6 +940,7 @@ static inline void set_new_dnode(struct dnode_of_data *dn, struct inode *inode,
> > #define NR_CURSEG_DATA_TYPE (3)
> > #define NR_CURSEG_NODE_TYPE (3)
> > #define NR_CURSEG_INMEM_TYPE (2)
> > +#define NR_CURSEG_RO_TYPE (2)
> > #define NR_CURSEG_PERSIST_TYPE (NR_CURSEG_DATA_TYPE + NR_CURSEG_NODE_TYPE)
> > #define NR_CURSEG_TYPE (NR_CURSEG_INMEM_TYPE + NR_CURSEG_PERSIST_TYPE)
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > index 8668df7870d0..67cec8f858a2 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > @@ -4674,6 +4674,9 @@ static int sanity_check_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > {
> > int i;
> > + if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi->raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_RO))
> > + return 0;
>
> We need to skip this sanity check because .next_blkoff may point to end position
> of image?
Since we only use hot data and node. Let me check them only.
>
> > +
> > /*
> > * In LFS/SSR curseg, .next_blkoff should point to an unused blkaddr;
> > * In LFS curseg, all blkaddr after .next_blkoff should be unused.
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > index b29de80ab60e..312bfab54693 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > @@ -1819,7 +1819,11 @@ static int f2fs_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct dentry *root)
> > static void default_options(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > {
> > /* init some FS parameters */
> > - F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs = NR_CURSEG_PERSIST_TYPE;
> > + if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi->raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_RO))
> > + F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs = NR_CURSEG_RO_TYPE;
> > + else
> > + F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs = NR_CURSEG_PERSIST_TYPE;
> > +
> > F2FS_OPTION(sbi).inline_xattr_size = DEFAULT_INLINE_XATTR_ADDRS;
> > F2FS_OPTION(sbi).whint_mode = WHINT_MODE_OFF;
> > F2FS_OPTION(sbi).alloc_mode = ALLOC_MODE_DEFAULT;
> > @@ -1994,6 +1998,11 @@ static int f2fs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
> > err = parse_options(sb, data, true);
> > if (err)
> > goto restore_opts;
> > +
> > + if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi->raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_RO) &&
> > + !(*flags & SB_RDONLY))
>
> err = -EROFS; ?
Done.
>
> > + goto restore_opts;
> > +
> > checkpoint_changed =
> > disable_checkpoint != test_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT);
> > @@ -3137,16 +3146,18 @@ int f2fs_sanity_check_ckpt(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > ovp_segments = le32_to_cpu(ckpt->overprov_segment_count);
> > reserved_segments = le32_to_cpu(ckpt->rsvd_segment_count);
> > + if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi->raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_RO))
> > + goto no_reserved;
> > if (unlikely(fsmeta < F2FS_MIN_META_SEGMENTS ||
> > ovp_segments == 0 || reserved_segments == 0)) {
> > f2fs_err(sbi, "Wrong layout: check mkfs.f2fs version");
> > return 1;
> > }
>
> Well, why not:
>
> if (!F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(, RO) && unlikely()) {
> }
Done.
>
> > -
> > +no_reserved:
> > user_block_count = le64_to_cpu(ckpt->user_block_count);
> > segment_count_main = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->segment_count_main);
> > log_blocks_per_seg = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->log_blocks_per_seg);
> > - if (!user_block_count || user_block_count >=
> > + if (!user_block_count || user_block_count >
>
> Does this change related to RO feature? if so, let's split condition for
> RO feature here?
Done.
>
> > segment_count_main << log_blocks_per_seg) {
> > f2fs_err(sbi, "Wrong user_block_count: %u",
> > user_block_count);
> > @@ -3175,6 +3186,10 @@ int f2fs_sanity_check_ckpt(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > if (le32_to_cpu(ckpt->cur_node_segno[i]) >= main_segs ||
> > le16_to_cpu(ckpt->cur_node_blkoff[i]) >= blocks_per_seg)
> > return 1;
> > +
> > + if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi->raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_RO))
> > + goto check_data;
> > +
> > for (j = i + 1; j < NR_CURSEG_NODE_TYPE; j++) {
> > if (le32_to_cpu(ckpt->cur_node_segno[i]) ==
> > le32_to_cpu(ckpt->cur_node_segno[j])) {
> > @@ -3185,10 +3200,15 @@ int f2fs_sanity_check_ckpt(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > +check_data:
> > for (i = 0; i < NR_CURSEG_DATA_TYPE; i++) {
> > if (le32_to_cpu(ckpt->cur_data_segno[i]) >= main_segs ||
> > le16_to_cpu(ckpt->cur_data_blkoff[i]) >= blocks_per_seg)
> > return 1;
> > +
> > + if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi->raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_RO))
> > + goto skip_cross;
> > +
> > for (j = i + 1; j < NR_CURSEG_DATA_TYPE; j++) {
> > if (le32_to_cpu(ckpt->cur_data_segno[i]) ==
> > le32_to_cpu(ckpt->cur_data_segno[j])) {
> > @@ -3210,7 +3230,7 @@ int f2fs_sanity_check_ckpt(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > -
> > +skip_cross:
> > sit_bitmap_size = le32_to_cpu(ckpt->sit_ver_bitmap_bytesize);
> > nat_bitmap_size = le32_to_cpu(ckpt->nat_ver_bitmap_bytesize);
> > @@ -3703,6 +3723,13 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> > if (err)
> > goto free_options;
> > + if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi->raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_RO) &&
> > + !f2fs_readonly(sbi->sb)) {
> > + f2fs_info(sbi, "Allow to mount readonly mode only");
> > + err = -EINVAL;
> > + goto free_options;
> > + }
>
> How about relocating this to parse_options() like other features did, then
> we don't need to handle this in both fill_super() and remount()?
Done. But not sure what you mean "we don't need to handle both".
Thanks,
>
> Thanks,
>
> > +
> > sb->s_maxbytes = max_file_blocks(NULL) <<
> > le32_to_cpu(raw_super->log_blocksize);
> > sb->s_max_links = F2FS_LINK_MAX;
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-26 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-21 19:02 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: immutable file can have null address in compressed chunk Jaegeuk Kim
2021-05-21 19:02 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-05-21 19:02 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: support RO feature Jaegeuk Kim
2021-05-21 19:02 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-05-24 11:53 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2021-05-24 11:53 ` Chao Yu
2021-05-24 17:07 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-05-24 17:07 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-05-25 1:15 ` Chao Yu
2021-05-25 1:15 ` Chao Yu
2021-05-25 1:45 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-05-25 1:45 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-05-26 9:42 ` Chao Yu
2021-05-26 9:42 ` Chao Yu
2021-05-26 13:58 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2021-05-26 13:58 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-05-26 15:06 ` Chao Yu
2021-05-26 15:06 ` Chao Yu
2021-05-26 15:45 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-05-26 15:45 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-05-26 13:59 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2021-05-26 13:59 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-05-26 14:06 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2021-05-26 14:06 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-05-26 14:43 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2 v3] " Jaegeuk Kim
2021-05-26 14:43 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-05-27 1:19 ` Chao Yu
2021-05-27 1:19 ` Chao Yu
2021-05-27 1:36 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-05-27 1:36 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-05-28 2:07 ` Chao Yu
2021-05-28 2:07 ` Chao Yu
2021-06-02 15:16 ` Chao Yu
2021-06-02 15:16 ` Chao Yu
2021-06-02 19:02 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2 v4] " Jaegeuk Kim
2021-06-02 19:02 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-06-03 15:52 ` Chao Yu
2021-06-03 15:52 ` Chao Yu
2021-06-03 16:08 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2 v5] " Jaegeuk Kim
2021-06-03 16:08 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-06-04 23:47 ` Chao Yu
2021-06-04 23:47 ` Chao Yu
2021-05-26 15:32 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] " kernel test robot
2021-05-26 16:40 ` kernel test robot
2021-05-26 9:08 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: immutable file can have null address in compressed chunk Chao Yu
2021-05-26 9:08 ` Chao Yu
2021-05-26 14:02 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-05-26 14:02 ` Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YK5UHr4fV1Hg8MoO@google.com \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.