All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: "Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
	"linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"coresight@lists.linaro.org" <coresight@lists.linaro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] perf env: Set flag for kernel is 64-bit mode
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:59:49 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YO7t1UTrPh4TsiI9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR11MB56264B3A7E4709CB0635F320E0149@PH0PR11MB5626.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

Em Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 05:31:03PM +0000, Hunter, Adrian escreveu:
> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 03:14:35PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 06:41:04PM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> > > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/env.c
> > > > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> > > >  #include <stdlib.h>
> > > >  #include <string.h>

> > > > +int kernel_is_64_bit;
> > > >  struct perf_env perf_env;

> > > Why can't this be in 'struct perf_env'?

> > Good question.  I considered to add it in struct perf_env but finally I used this
> > way; the reason is this variable "kernel_is_64_bit" is only used during
> > recording phase for AUX ring buffer, and don't use it for report.  So seems to
> > me it's over complexity to add a new field and just wander if it's necessary to
> > save this field as new feature in the perf header.

> I think we store the arch, so if the "kernel_is_64_bit" calculation depends only on arch
> then I guess we don't need a new feature at the moment.

So, I wasn't suggesting to add this info to the perf.data file header,
just to the in-memory 'struct perf_env'.

And also we should avoid unconditionally initializing things that we may
never need, please structure it as:

static void perf_env__init_kernel_mode(struct perf_env *env)
{
       const char *arch = perf_env__raw_arch(env);

       if (!strncmp(arch, "x86_64", 6)   || !strncmp(arch, "aarch64", 7) ||
           !strncmp(arch, "arm64", 5)    || !strncmp(arch, "mips64", 6) ||
           !strncmp(arch, "parisc64", 8) || !strncmp(arch, "riscv64", 7) ||
           !strncmp(arch, "s390x", 5)    || !strncmp(arch, "sparc64", 7))
               kernel_is_64_bit = 1;
       else
               kernel_is_64_bit = 0;
}


void perf_env__init(struct perf_env *env)
{
	...
	env->kernel_is_64_bit = -1;
	...
}

bool perf_env__kernel_is_64_bit(struct perf_env *env)
{
	if (env->kernel_is_64_bit == -1)
		perf_env__init_kernel_mode(env);

	return env->kernel_is_64_bit;
}

One thing in my TODO is to crack down on the tons of initializations
perf does unconditionally, last time I looked there are lots :-\

- Arnaldo
 
> > Combining the comment from Adrian in another email, I think it's good to add
> > a new field "compat_mode" in the struct perf_env, and this field will be
> > initialized in build-record.c.  Currently we don't need to save this value into
> > the perf file, if later we need to use this value for decoding phase, then we
> > can add a new feature item to save "compat_mode"
> > into the perf file's header.

> > If you have any different idea, please let me know.  Thanks!

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: "Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
	"linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"coresight@lists.linaro.org" <coresight@lists.linaro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] perf env: Set flag for kernel is 64-bit mode
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:59:49 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YO7t1UTrPh4TsiI9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR11MB56264B3A7E4709CB0635F320E0149@PH0PR11MB5626.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

Em Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 05:31:03PM +0000, Hunter, Adrian escreveu:
> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 03:14:35PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 06:41:04PM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> > > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/env.c
> > > > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> > > >  #include <stdlib.h>
> > > >  #include <string.h>

> > > > +int kernel_is_64_bit;
> > > >  struct perf_env perf_env;

> > > Why can't this be in 'struct perf_env'?

> > Good question.  I considered to add it in struct perf_env but finally I used this
> > way; the reason is this variable "kernel_is_64_bit" is only used during
> > recording phase for AUX ring buffer, and don't use it for report.  So seems to
> > me it's over complexity to add a new field and just wander if it's necessary to
> > save this field as new feature in the perf header.

> I think we store the arch, so if the "kernel_is_64_bit" calculation depends only on arch
> then I guess we don't need a new feature at the moment.

So, I wasn't suggesting to add this info to the perf.data file header,
just to the in-memory 'struct perf_env'.

And also we should avoid unconditionally initializing things that we may
never need, please structure it as:

static void perf_env__init_kernel_mode(struct perf_env *env)
{
       const char *arch = perf_env__raw_arch(env);

       if (!strncmp(arch, "x86_64", 6)   || !strncmp(arch, "aarch64", 7) ||
           !strncmp(arch, "arm64", 5)    || !strncmp(arch, "mips64", 6) ||
           !strncmp(arch, "parisc64", 8) || !strncmp(arch, "riscv64", 7) ||
           !strncmp(arch, "s390x", 5)    || !strncmp(arch, "sparc64", 7))
               kernel_is_64_bit = 1;
       else
               kernel_is_64_bit = 0;
}


void perf_env__init(struct perf_env *env)
{
	...
	env->kernel_is_64_bit = -1;
	...
}

bool perf_env__kernel_is_64_bit(struct perf_env *env)
{
	if (env->kernel_is_64_bit == -1)
		perf_env__init_kernel_mode(env);

	return env->kernel_is_64_bit;
}

One thing in my TODO is to crack down on the tons of initializations
perf does unconditionally, last time I looked there are lots :-\

- Arnaldo
 
> > Combining the comment from Adrian in another email, I think it's good to add
> > a new field "compat_mode" in the struct perf_env, and this field will be
> > initialized in build-record.c.  Currently we don't need to save this value into
> > the perf file, if later we need to use this value for decoding phase, then we
> > can add a new feature item to save "compat_mode"
> > into the perf file's header.

> > If you have any different idea, please let me know.  Thanks!

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-14 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-11 10:40 [PATCH v4 00/11] perf: Refine barriers for AUX ring buffer Leo Yan
2021-07-11 10:40 ` Leo Yan
2021-07-11 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] perf/ring_buffer: Add comment for barriers on " Leo Yan
2021-07-11 10:40   ` Leo Yan
2021-07-11 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] coresight: tmc-etr: Add barrier after updating " Leo Yan
2021-07-11 10:40   ` Leo Yan
2021-07-12 10:40   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-07-12 10:40     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-07-12 10:54     ` Leo Yan
2021-07-12 10:54       ` Leo Yan
2021-07-11 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] coresight: tmc-etf: Add comment for store ordering Leo Yan
2021-07-11 10:40   ` Leo Yan
2021-07-13 12:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-13 12:56     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-13 15:49     ` Leo Yan
2021-07-13 15:49       ` Leo Yan
2021-07-11 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] perf/x86: Add barrier after updating bts Leo Yan
2021-07-11 10:40   ` Leo Yan
2021-07-13 13:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-13 13:01     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-11 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] perf auxtrace: Use WRITE_ONCE() for updating aux_tail Leo Yan
2021-07-11 10:40   ` Leo Yan
2021-07-11 10:41 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] perf auxtrace: Drop legacy __sync functions Leo Yan
2021-07-11 10:41   ` Leo Yan
2021-07-11 10:41 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] perf auxtrace: Remove auxtrace_mmap__read_snapshot_head() Leo Yan
2021-07-11 10:41   ` Leo Yan
2021-07-12 14:32   ` Adrian Hunter
2021-07-12 14:32     ` Adrian Hunter
2021-07-13 13:10     ` Leo Yan
2021-07-13 13:10       ` Leo Yan
2021-07-11 10:41 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] perf: Cleanup for HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_SUPPORT Leo Yan
2021-07-11 10:41   ` Leo Yan
2021-07-11 10:41 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] tools: Remove feature-sync-compare-and-swap feature detection Leo Yan
2021-07-11 10:41   ` Leo Yan
2021-07-11 10:41 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] perf env: Set flag for kernel is 64-bit mode Leo Yan
2021-07-11 10:41   ` Leo Yan
2021-07-12 14:37   ` Adrian Hunter
2021-07-12 14:37     ` Adrian Hunter
2021-07-12 18:14   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-07-12 18:14     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-07-13 15:09     ` Leo Yan
2021-07-13 15:09       ` Leo Yan
2021-07-13 17:31       ` Hunter, Adrian
2021-07-13 17:31         ` Hunter, Adrian
2021-07-14 13:59         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2021-07-14 13:59           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-07-14 14:00           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-07-14 14:00             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-07-23  7:11             ` Leo Yan
2021-07-23  7:11               ` Leo Yan
2021-07-11 10:41 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] perf auxtrace: Add compat_auxtrace_mmap__{read_head|write_tail} Leo Yan
2021-07-11 10:41   ` Leo Yan
2021-07-12 14:44   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-07-12 14:44     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-07-13 15:46     ` Leo Yan
2021-07-13 15:46       ` Leo Yan
2021-07-13 16:14       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-07-13 16:14         ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-07-13 18:13         ` Catalin Marinas
2021-07-13 18:13           ` Catalin Marinas
2021-07-14  8:40           ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-07-14  8:40             ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-07-23  7:23             ` Leo Yan
2021-07-23  7:23               ` Leo Yan
2021-07-13  7:07   ` Adrian Hunter
2021-07-13  7:07     ` Adrian Hunter
2021-07-13 15:48     ` Leo Yan
2021-07-13 15:48       ` Leo Yan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YO7t1UTrPh4TsiI9@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.