From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [bug report] iommu_dma_unmap_sg() is very slow then running IO from remote numa node
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 09:40:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YPd7IGFZrsTRfUxE@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad5bc549-d83f-bee0-9a9f-03a5afd7f3d9@huawei.com>
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 05:14:28PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> On 09/07/2021 15:24, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > associated compromises.
> > Follows the log of 'perf report'
> >
> > 1) good(run fio from cpus in the nvme's numa node)
>
> Hi Ming,
>
> If you're still interested in this issue, as an experiment only you can try
> my rebased patches here:
>
> https://github.com/hisilicon/kernel-dev/commits/private-topic-smmu-5.14-cmdq-4
>
> I think that you should see a significant performance boost.
There is build issue, please check your tree:
MODPOST vmlinux.symvers
MODINFO modules.builtin.modinfo
GEN modules.builtin
LD .tmp_vmlinux.btf
ld: Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected!
ld: Unexpected run-time procedure linkages detected!
ld: drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.o: in function `smmu_test_store':
/root/git/linux/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:3892: undefined reference to `smmu_test_core'
BTF .btf.vmlinux.bin.o
pahole: .tmp_vmlinux.btf: No such file or directory
LD .tmp_vmlinux.kallsyms1
.btf.vmlinux.bin.o: file not recognized: file format not recognized
make: *** [Makefile:1177: vmlinux] Error 1
Thanks,
Ming
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug report] iommu_dma_unmap_sg() is very slow then running IO from remote numa node
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 09:40:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YPd7IGFZrsTRfUxE@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad5bc549-d83f-bee0-9a9f-03a5afd7f3d9@huawei.com>
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 05:14:28PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> On 09/07/2021 15:24, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > associated compromises.
> > Follows the log of 'perf report'
> >
> > 1) good(run fio from cpus in the nvme's numa node)
>
> Hi Ming,
>
> If you're still interested in this issue, as an experiment only you can try
> my rebased patches here:
>
> https://github.com/hisilicon/kernel-dev/commits/private-topic-smmu-5.14-cmdq-4
>
> I think that you should see a significant performance boost.
There is build issue, please check your tree:
MODPOST vmlinux.symvers
MODINFO modules.builtin.modinfo
GEN modules.builtin
LD .tmp_vmlinux.btf
ld: Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected!
ld: Unexpected run-time procedure linkages detected!
ld: drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.o: in function `smmu_test_store':
/root/git/linux/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:3892: undefined reference to `smmu_test_core'
BTF .btf.vmlinux.bin.o
pahole: .tmp_vmlinux.btf: No such file or directory
LD .tmp_vmlinux.kallsyms1
.btf.vmlinux.bin.o: file not recognized: file format not recognized
make: *** [Makefile:1177: vmlinux] Error 1
Thanks,
Ming
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug report] iommu_dma_unmap_sg() is very slow then running IO from remote numa node
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 09:40:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YPd7IGFZrsTRfUxE@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad5bc549-d83f-bee0-9a9f-03a5afd7f3d9@huawei.com>
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 05:14:28PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> On 09/07/2021 15:24, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > associated compromises.
> > Follows the log of 'perf report'
> >
> > 1) good(run fio from cpus in the nvme's numa node)
>
> Hi Ming,
>
> If you're still interested in this issue, as an experiment only you can try
> my rebased patches here:
>
> https://github.com/hisilicon/kernel-dev/commits/private-topic-smmu-5.14-cmdq-4
>
> I think that you should see a significant performance boost.
There is build issue, please check your tree:
MODPOST vmlinux.symvers
MODINFO modules.builtin.modinfo
GEN modules.builtin
LD .tmp_vmlinux.btf
ld: Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected!
ld: Unexpected run-time procedure linkages detected!
ld: drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.o: in function `smmu_test_store':
/root/git/linux/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:3892: undefined reference to `smmu_test_core'
BTF .btf.vmlinux.bin.o
pahole: .tmp_vmlinux.btf: No such file or directory
LD .tmp_vmlinux.kallsyms1
.btf.vmlinux.bin.o: file not recognized: file format not recognized
make: *** [Makefile:1177: vmlinux] Error 1
Thanks,
Ming
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-21 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-09 8:38 [bug report] iommu_dma_unmap_sg() is very slow then running IO from remote numa node Ming Lei
2021-07-09 8:38 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-09 8:38 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-09 10:16 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-07-09 10:16 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-07-09 10:16 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-07-09 14:21 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-09 14:21 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-09 14:21 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-09 10:26 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-09 10:26 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-09 10:26 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-09 11:04 ` John Garry
2021-07-09 11:04 ` John Garry
2021-07-09 11:04 ` John Garry
2021-07-09 12:34 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-09 12:34 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-09 12:34 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-09 14:24 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-09 14:24 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-09 14:24 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-19 16:14 ` John Garry
2021-07-19 16:14 ` John Garry
2021-07-19 16:14 ` John Garry
2021-07-21 1:40 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-07-21 1:40 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-21 1:40 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-21 9:23 ` John Garry
2021-07-21 9:23 ` John Garry
2021-07-21 9:23 ` John Garry
2021-07-21 9:59 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-21 9:59 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-21 9:59 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-21 11:07 ` John Garry
2021-07-21 11:07 ` John Garry
2021-07-21 11:07 ` John Garry
2021-07-21 11:58 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-21 11:58 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-21 11:58 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-22 7:58 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-22 7:58 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-22 7:58 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-22 10:05 ` John Garry
2021-07-22 10:05 ` John Garry
2021-07-22 10:05 ` John Garry
2021-07-22 10:19 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-22 10:19 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-22 10:19 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-22 11:12 ` John Garry
2021-07-22 11:12 ` John Garry
2021-07-22 11:12 ` John Garry
2021-07-22 12:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-22 12:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-22 12:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-22 13:54 ` John Garry
2021-07-22 13:54 ` John Garry
2021-07-22 13:54 ` John Garry
2021-07-22 15:54 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-22 15:54 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-22 15:54 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-22 17:40 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-22 17:40 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-22 17:40 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-23 10:21 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-23 10:21 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-23 10:21 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-26 7:51 ` John Garry
2021-07-26 7:51 ` John Garry
2021-07-26 7:51 ` John Garry
2021-07-28 1:32 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-28 1:32 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-28 1:32 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-28 10:38 ` John Garry
2021-07-28 10:38 ` John Garry
2021-07-28 10:38 ` John Garry
2021-07-28 15:17 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-28 15:17 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-28 15:17 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-28 15:39 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-28 15:39 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-28 15:39 ` Robin Murphy
2021-08-10 9:36 ` John Garry
2021-08-10 9:36 ` John Garry
2021-08-10 9:36 ` John Garry
2021-08-10 10:35 ` Ming Lei
2021-08-10 10:35 ` Ming Lei
2021-08-10 10:35 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-27 17:08 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-27 17:08 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-27 17:08 ` Robin Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YPd7IGFZrsTRfUxE@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.