From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] genirq/affinity: move group_cpus_evenly() into lib/
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 09:04:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRm5lXfnukXU8Ebh@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202108150001.EBuNGcQ8-lkp@intel.com>
Hello,
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 01:01:07AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Ming,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on tip/irq/core]
> [also build test WARNING on next-20210813]
> [cannot apply to block/for-next linux/master linus/master v5.14-rc5]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Ming-Lei/genirq-affinity-abstract-new-API-from-managed-irq-affinity-spread/20210814-203741
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git 04c2721d3530f0723b4c922a8fa9f26b202a20de
> config: hexagon-randconfig-r041-20210814 (attached as .config)
> compiler: clang version 12.0.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/759f72186bfdd5c3ba8b53ac0749cf7ba930012c
> git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
> git fetch --no-tags linux-review Ming-Lei/genirq-affinity-abstract-new-API-from-managed-irq-affinity-spread/20210814-203741
> git checkout 759f72186bfdd5c3ba8b53ac0749cf7ba930012c
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=hexagon
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> >> lib/group_cpus.c:344:17: warning: no previous prototype for function 'group_cpus_evenly' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> struct cpumask *group_cpus_evenly(unsigned int numgrps)
> ^
> lib/group_cpus.c:344:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
> struct cpumask *group_cpus_evenly(unsigned int numgrps)
> ^
> static
> 1 warning generated.
>
>
> vim +/group_cpus_evenly +344 lib/group_cpus.c
>
> 328
> 329 /**
> 330 * group_cpus_evenly - Group all CPUs evenly per NUMA/CPU locality
> 331 * @numgrps: number of groups
> 332 *
> 333 * Return: cpumask array if successful, NULL otherwise. And each element
> 334 * includes CPUs assigned to this group
> 335 *
> 336 * Try to put close CPUs from viewpoint of CPU and NUMA locality into
> 337 * same group, and run two-stage grouping:
> 338 * 1) allocate present CPUs on these groups evenly first
> 339 * 2) allocate other possible CPUs on these groups evenly
> 340 *
> 341 * We guarantee in the resulted grouping that all CPUs are covered, and
> 342 * no same CPU is assigned to different groups
> 343 */
> > 344 struct cpumask *group_cpus_evenly(unsigned int numgrps)
But the above symbol is exported via EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(), in current
kernel tree, we usually keep such exported symbol as global, or is there
some change in kernel coding style recently?
Thanks,
Ming
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] genirq/affinity: move group_cpus_evenly() into lib/
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 09:04:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRm5lXfnukXU8Ebh@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202108150001.EBuNGcQ8-lkp@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3253 bytes --]
Hello,
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 01:01:07AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Ming,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on tip/irq/core]
> [also build test WARNING on next-20210813]
> [cannot apply to block/for-next linux/master linus/master v5.14-rc5]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Ming-Lei/genirq-affinity-abstract-new-API-from-managed-irq-affinity-spread/20210814-203741
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git 04c2721d3530f0723b4c922a8fa9f26b202a20de
> config: hexagon-randconfig-r041-20210814 (attached as .config)
> compiler: clang version 12.0.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/759f72186bfdd5c3ba8b53ac0749cf7ba930012c
> git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
> git fetch --no-tags linux-review Ming-Lei/genirq-affinity-abstract-new-API-from-managed-irq-affinity-spread/20210814-203741
> git checkout 759f72186bfdd5c3ba8b53ac0749cf7ba930012c
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=hexagon
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> >> lib/group_cpus.c:344:17: warning: no previous prototype for function 'group_cpus_evenly' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> struct cpumask *group_cpus_evenly(unsigned int numgrps)
> ^
> lib/group_cpus.c:344:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
> struct cpumask *group_cpus_evenly(unsigned int numgrps)
> ^
> static
> 1 warning generated.
>
>
> vim +/group_cpus_evenly +344 lib/group_cpus.c
>
> 328
> 329 /**
> 330 * group_cpus_evenly - Group all CPUs evenly per NUMA/CPU locality
> 331 * @numgrps: number of groups
> 332 *
> 333 * Return: cpumask array if successful, NULL otherwise. And each element
> 334 * includes CPUs assigned to this group
> 335 *
> 336 * Try to put close CPUs from viewpoint of CPU and NUMA locality into
> 337 * same group, and run two-stage grouping:
> 338 * 1) allocate present CPUs on these groups evenly first
> 339 * 2) allocate other possible CPUs on these groups evenly
> 340 *
> 341 * We guarantee in the resulted grouping that all CPUs are covered, and
> 342 * no same CPU is assigned to different groups
> 343 */
> > 344 struct cpumask *group_cpus_evenly(unsigned int numgrps)
But the above symbol is exported via EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(), in current
kernel tree, we usually keep such exported symbol as global, or is there
some change in kernel coding style recently?
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-16 1:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-14 12:35 [PATCH 0/7] genirq/affinity: abstract new API from managed irq affinity spread Ming Lei
2021-08-14 12:35 ` [PATCH 1/7] genirq/affinity: remove the 'firstvec' parameter from irq_build_affinity_masks Ming Lei
2021-08-17 4:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-14 12:35 ` [PATCH 2/7] genirq/affinity: pass affinity managed mask array to irq_build_affinity_masks Ming Lei
2021-08-17 4:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-14 12:35 ` [PATCH 3/7] genirq/affinity: don't pass irq_affinity_desc " Ming Lei
2021-08-17 4:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-14 12:35 ` [PATCH 4/7] genirq/affinity: rename irq_build_affinity_masks as group_cpus_evenly Ming Lei
2021-08-17 4:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-18 8:38 ` Ming Lei
2021-08-14 12:35 ` [PATCH 5/7] genirq/affinity: move group_cpus_evenly() into lib/ Ming Lei
2021-08-14 17:01 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-14 17:01 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-16 1:04 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-08-16 1:04 ` Ming Lei
2021-08-17 4:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-17 4:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-14 17:15 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-14 17:15 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-14 12:35 ` [PATCH 6/7] lib/group_cpus: allow to group cpus in case of !CONFIG_SMP Ming Lei
2021-08-17 4:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-14 12:35 ` [PATCH 7/7] blk-mq: build default queue map via group_cpus_evenly() Ming Lei
2021-08-14 16:31 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-14 16:31 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-14 20:49 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-14 20:49 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-16 7:23 ` Ming Lei
2021-08-16 7:23 ` Ming Lei
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-08-15 1:49 [PATCH 5/7] genirq/affinity: move group_cpus_evenly() into lib/ kernel test robot
2021-08-16 10:08 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-16 10:08 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YRm5lXfnukXU8Ebh@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.