From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Nikhil Devshatwar <nikhil.nd@ti.com>,
Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@nxp.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] phy: cdns-dphy: Prepare for Rx support
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 04:25:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YSL48RA2ksldoCyX@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210820190346.18550-2-p.yadav@ti.com>
Hi Pratyush,
Thank you for the patch.
On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 12:33:41AM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> The Rx programming sequence differs from the Tx programming sequence.
> Currently only Tx mode is supported. For example, the power on and off,
> validation, and configuration procedures are all different between Rx
> and Tx DPHYs. Currently they are only written from a Tx point of view
> and they won't work with an Rx DPHY. Move them to cdns_dphy_ops so they
> can be defined by the implementation, accommodating both Rx and Tx mode
> DPHYs.
>
> The clocks "psm" and "pll_ref" are not used by the Rx path so make them
> optional in the probe and then check if they exist in the Tx power_on()
> hook.
I think it would be better to check them at probe time.
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Instead of having both Rx and Tx modes in the same driver data, keep
> them separate since the op selection is based on compatible now. For
> that reason, the cdns_dphy_driver_data struct is no longer needed.
> - Rename ref_dphy_ops to tx_ref_dphy_ops to clarify their purpose.
> - Drop submode checks in validate() hook.
>
> drivers/phy/cadence/cdns-dphy.c | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/cadence/cdns-dphy.c b/drivers/phy/cadence/cdns-dphy.c
> index ba042e39cfaf..0a169d649216 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/cadence/cdns-dphy.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/cadence/cdns-dphy.c
> @@ -75,6 +75,11 @@ struct cdns_dphy;
> struct cdns_dphy_ops {
> int (*probe)(struct cdns_dphy *dphy);
> void (*remove)(struct cdns_dphy *dphy);
> + int (*power_on)(struct cdns_dphy *dphy);
> + int (*power_off)(struct cdns_dphy *dphy);
> + int (*validate)(struct cdns_dphy *dphy, enum phy_mode mode, int submode,
> + union phy_configure_opts *opts);
> + int (*configure)(struct cdns_dphy *dphy, union phy_configure_opts *opts);
> void (*set_psm_div)(struct cdns_dphy *dphy, u8 div);
> void (*set_clk_lane_cfg)(struct cdns_dphy *dphy,
> enum cdns_dphy_clk_lane_cfg cfg);
> @@ -86,6 +91,7 @@ struct cdns_dphy_ops {
> struct cdns_dphy {
> struct cdns_dphy_cfg cfg;
> void __iomem *regs;
> + struct device *dev;
> struct clk *psm_clk;
> struct clk *pll_ref_clk;
> const struct cdns_dphy_ops *ops;
> @@ -199,20 +205,9 @@ static void cdns_dphy_ref_set_psm_div(struct cdns_dphy *dphy, u8 div)
> dphy->regs + DPHY_PSM_CFG);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * This is the reference implementation of DPHY hooks. Specific integration of
> - * this IP may have to re-implement some of them depending on how they decided
> - * to wire things in the SoC.
> - */
> -static const struct cdns_dphy_ops ref_dphy_ops = {
> - .get_wakeup_time_ns = cdns_dphy_ref_get_wakeup_time_ns,
> - .set_pll_cfg = cdns_dphy_ref_set_pll_cfg,
> - .set_psm_div = cdns_dphy_ref_set_psm_div,
> -};
> -
> -static int cdns_dphy_config_from_opts(struct phy *phy,
> - struct phy_configure_opts_mipi_dphy *opts,
> - struct cdns_dphy_cfg *cfg)
> +static int cdns_dphy_tx_config_from_opts(struct phy *phy,
> + struct phy_configure_opts_mipi_dphy *opts,
> + struct cdns_dphy_cfg *cfg)
> {
> struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> unsigned int dsi_hfp_ext = 0;
> @@ -232,24 +227,13 @@ static int cdns_dphy_config_from_opts(struct phy *phy,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int cdns_dphy_validate(struct phy *phy, enum phy_mode mode, int submode,
> - union phy_configure_opts *opts)
> +static int cdns_dphy_tx_configure(struct cdns_dphy *dphy,
> + union phy_configure_opts *opts)
> {
> struct cdns_dphy_cfg cfg = { 0 };
> -
> - if (mode != PHY_MODE_MIPI_DPHY)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - return cdns_dphy_config_from_opts(phy, &opts->mipi_dphy, &cfg);
> -}
> -
> -static int cdns_dphy_configure(struct phy *phy, union phy_configure_opts *opts)
> -{
> - struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> - struct cdns_dphy_cfg cfg = { 0 };
> int ret;
>
> - ret = cdns_dphy_config_from_opts(phy, &opts->mipi_dphy, &cfg);
> + ret = cdns_dphy_tx_config_from_opts(dphy->phy, &opts->mipi_dphy, &cfg);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -279,9 +263,18 @@ static int cdns_dphy_configure(struct phy *phy, union phy_configure_opts *opts)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int cdns_dphy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
> +static int cdns_dphy_tx_validate(struct cdns_dphy *dphy, enum phy_mode mode,
> + int submode, union phy_configure_opts *opts)
> {
> - struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> + struct cdns_dphy_cfg cfg = { 0 };
> +
> + return cdns_dphy_tx_config_from_opts(dphy->phy, &opts->mipi_dphy, &cfg);
> +}
> +
> +static int cdns_dphy_tx_power_on(struct cdns_dphy *dphy)
> +{
> + if (!dphy->psm_clk || !dphy->pll_ref_clk)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> clk_prepare_enable(dphy->psm_clk);
> clk_prepare_enable(dphy->pll_ref_clk);
> @@ -293,16 +286,73 @@ static int cdns_dphy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int cdns_dphy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
> +static int cdns_dphy_tx_power_off(struct cdns_dphy *dphy)
> {
> - struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> -
> clk_disable_unprepare(dphy->pll_ref_clk);
> clk_disable_unprepare(dphy->psm_clk);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * This is the reference implementation of DPHY hooks. Specific integration of
> + * this IP may have to re-implement some of them depending on how they decided
> + * to wire things in the SoC.
> + */
> +static const struct cdns_dphy_ops tx_ref_dphy_ops = {
> + .power_on = cdns_dphy_tx_power_on,
> + .power_off = cdns_dphy_tx_power_off,
> + .validate = cdns_dphy_tx_validate,
> + .configure = cdns_dphy_tx_configure,
> + .get_wakeup_time_ns = cdns_dphy_ref_get_wakeup_time_ns,
> + .set_pll_cfg = cdns_dphy_ref_set_pll_cfg,
> + .set_psm_div = cdns_dphy_ref_set_psm_div,
> +};
> +
> +static int cdns_dphy_validate(struct phy *phy, enum phy_mode mode, int submode,
> + union phy_configure_opts *opts)
> +{
> + struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> +
> + if (mode != PHY_MODE_MIPI_DPHY)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (dphy->ops->validate)
> + return dphy->ops->validate(dphy, mode, submode, opts);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int cdns_dphy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
> +{
> + struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> +
> + if (dphy->ops->power_on)
> + return dphy->ops->power_on(dphy);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int cdns_dphy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
> +{
> + struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> +
> + if (dphy->ops->power_off)
> + return dphy->ops->power_off(dphy);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int cdns_dphy_configure(struct phy *phy, union phy_configure_opts *opts)
> +{
> + struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> +
> + if (dphy->ops->configure)
> + return dphy->ops->configure(dphy, opts);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
Given that all of these are essentially pass-through operations, how
about getting rid of the indirection ? I would create a new structure:
struct cdns_dphy_info {
const struct phy_ops *phy_ops;
const struct cdns_dphy_ops *dphy_ops;
};
and reference it in cdns_dphy_of_match. The cdns_dphy structure would
then store a pointer to cdns_dphy_info. That way you won't have to
extend cdns_dphy_ops, which could possibly be renamed to
cdns_dphy_tx_ops as you don't use those operations for rx.
> static const struct phy_ops cdns_dphy_ops = {
> .configure = cdns_dphy_configure,
> .validate = cdns_dphy_validate,
> @@ -320,6 +370,7 @@ static int cdns_dphy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!dphy)
> return -ENOMEM;
> dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, dphy);
> + dphy->dev = &pdev->dev;
>
> dphy->ops = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> if (!dphy->ops)
> @@ -329,11 +380,11 @@ static int cdns_dphy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(dphy->regs))
> return PTR_ERR(dphy->regs);
>
> - dphy->psm_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "psm");
> + dphy->psm_clk = devm_clk_get_optional(dphy->dev, "psm");
> if (IS_ERR(dphy->psm_clk))
> return PTR_ERR(dphy->psm_clk);
>
> - dphy->pll_ref_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "pll_ref");
> + dphy->pll_ref_clk = devm_clk_get_optional(dphy->dev, "pll_ref");
> if (IS_ERR(dphy->pll_ref_clk))
> return PTR_ERR(dphy->pll_ref_clk);
>
> @@ -369,7 +420,7 @@ static int cdns_dphy_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> static const struct of_device_id cdns_dphy_of_match[] = {
> - { .compatible = "cdns,dphy", .data = &ref_dphy_ops },
> + { .compatible = "cdns,dphy", .data = &tx_ref_dphy_ops },
> { /* sentinel */ },
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cdns_dphy_of_match);
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Nikhil Devshatwar <nikhil.nd@ti.com>,
Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@nxp.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] phy: cdns-dphy: Prepare for Rx support
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 04:25:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YSL48RA2ksldoCyX@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210820190346.18550-2-p.yadav@ti.com>
Hi Pratyush,
Thank you for the patch.
On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 12:33:41AM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> The Rx programming sequence differs from the Tx programming sequence.
> Currently only Tx mode is supported. For example, the power on and off,
> validation, and configuration procedures are all different between Rx
> and Tx DPHYs. Currently they are only written from a Tx point of view
> and they won't work with an Rx DPHY. Move them to cdns_dphy_ops so they
> can be defined by the implementation, accommodating both Rx and Tx mode
> DPHYs.
>
> The clocks "psm" and "pll_ref" are not used by the Rx path so make them
> optional in the probe and then check if they exist in the Tx power_on()
> hook.
I think it would be better to check them at probe time.
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Instead of having both Rx and Tx modes in the same driver data, keep
> them separate since the op selection is based on compatible now. For
> that reason, the cdns_dphy_driver_data struct is no longer needed.
> - Rename ref_dphy_ops to tx_ref_dphy_ops to clarify their purpose.
> - Drop submode checks in validate() hook.
>
> drivers/phy/cadence/cdns-dphy.c | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/cadence/cdns-dphy.c b/drivers/phy/cadence/cdns-dphy.c
> index ba042e39cfaf..0a169d649216 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/cadence/cdns-dphy.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/cadence/cdns-dphy.c
> @@ -75,6 +75,11 @@ struct cdns_dphy;
> struct cdns_dphy_ops {
> int (*probe)(struct cdns_dphy *dphy);
> void (*remove)(struct cdns_dphy *dphy);
> + int (*power_on)(struct cdns_dphy *dphy);
> + int (*power_off)(struct cdns_dphy *dphy);
> + int (*validate)(struct cdns_dphy *dphy, enum phy_mode mode, int submode,
> + union phy_configure_opts *opts);
> + int (*configure)(struct cdns_dphy *dphy, union phy_configure_opts *opts);
> void (*set_psm_div)(struct cdns_dphy *dphy, u8 div);
> void (*set_clk_lane_cfg)(struct cdns_dphy *dphy,
> enum cdns_dphy_clk_lane_cfg cfg);
> @@ -86,6 +91,7 @@ struct cdns_dphy_ops {
> struct cdns_dphy {
> struct cdns_dphy_cfg cfg;
> void __iomem *regs;
> + struct device *dev;
> struct clk *psm_clk;
> struct clk *pll_ref_clk;
> const struct cdns_dphy_ops *ops;
> @@ -199,20 +205,9 @@ static void cdns_dphy_ref_set_psm_div(struct cdns_dphy *dphy, u8 div)
> dphy->regs + DPHY_PSM_CFG);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * This is the reference implementation of DPHY hooks. Specific integration of
> - * this IP may have to re-implement some of them depending on how they decided
> - * to wire things in the SoC.
> - */
> -static const struct cdns_dphy_ops ref_dphy_ops = {
> - .get_wakeup_time_ns = cdns_dphy_ref_get_wakeup_time_ns,
> - .set_pll_cfg = cdns_dphy_ref_set_pll_cfg,
> - .set_psm_div = cdns_dphy_ref_set_psm_div,
> -};
> -
> -static int cdns_dphy_config_from_opts(struct phy *phy,
> - struct phy_configure_opts_mipi_dphy *opts,
> - struct cdns_dphy_cfg *cfg)
> +static int cdns_dphy_tx_config_from_opts(struct phy *phy,
> + struct phy_configure_opts_mipi_dphy *opts,
> + struct cdns_dphy_cfg *cfg)
> {
> struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> unsigned int dsi_hfp_ext = 0;
> @@ -232,24 +227,13 @@ static int cdns_dphy_config_from_opts(struct phy *phy,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int cdns_dphy_validate(struct phy *phy, enum phy_mode mode, int submode,
> - union phy_configure_opts *opts)
> +static int cdns_dphy_tx_configure(struct cdns_dphy *dphy,
> + union phy_configure_opts *opts)
> {
> struct cdns_dphy_cfg cfg = { 0 };
> -
> - if (mode != PHY_MODE_MIPI_DPHY)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - return cdns_dphy_config_from_opts(phy, &opts->mipi_dphy, &cfg);
> -}
> -
> -static int cdns_dphy_configure(struct phy *phy, union phy_configure_opts *opts)
> -{
> - struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> - struct cdns_dphy_cfg cfg = { 0 };
> int ret;
>
> - ret = cdns_dphy_config_from_opts(phy, &opts->mipi_dphy, &cfg);
> + ret = cdns_dphy_tx_config_from_opts(dphy->phy, &opts->mipi_dphy, &cfg);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -279,9 +263,18 @@ static int cdns_dphy_configure(struct phy *phy, union phy_configure_opts *opts)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int cdns_dphy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
> +static int cdns_dphy_tx_validate(struct cdns_dphy *dphy, enum phy_mode mode,
> + int submode, union phy_configure_opts *opts)
> {
> - struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> + struct cdns_dphy_cfg cfg = { 0 };
> +
> + return cdns_dphy_tx_config_from_opts(dphy->phy, &opts->mipi_dphy, &cfg);
> +}
> +
> +static int cdns_dphy_tx_power_on(struct cdns_dphy *dphy)
> +{
> + if (!dphy->psm_clk || !dphy->pll_ref_clk)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> clk_prepare_enable(dphy->psm_clk);
> clk_prepare_enable(dphy->pll_ref_clk);
> @@ -293,16 +286,73 @@ static int cdns_dphy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int cdns_dphy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
> +static int cdns_dphy_tx_power_off(struct cdns_dphy *dphy)
> {
> - struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> -
> clk_disable_unprepare(dphy->pll_ref_clk);
> clk_disable_unprepare(dphy->psm_clk);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * This is the reference implementation of DPHY hooks. Specific integration of
> + * this IP may have to re-implement some of them depending on how they decided
> + * to wire things in the SoC.
> + */
> +static const struct cdns_dphy_ops tx_ref_dphy_ops = {
> + .power_on = cdns_dphy_tx_power_on,
> + .power_off = cdns_dphy_tx_power_off,
> + .validate = cdns_dphy_tx_validate,
> + .configure = cdns_dphy_tx_configure,
> + .get_wakeup_time_ns = cdns_dphy_ref_get_wakeup_time_ns,
> + .set_pll_cfg = cdns_dphy_ref_set_pll_cfg,
> + .set_psm_div = cdns_dphy_ref_set_psm_div,
> +};
> +
> +static int cdns_dphy_validate(struct phy *phy, enum phy_mode mode, int submode,
> + union phy_configure_opts *opts)
> +{
> + struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> +
> + if (mode != PHY_MODE_MIPI_DPHY)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (dphy->ops->validate)
> + return dphy->ops->validate(dphy, mode, submode, opts);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int cdns_dphy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
> +{
> + struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> +
> + if (dphy->ops->power_on)
> + return dphy->ops->power_on(dphy);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int cdns_dphy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
> +{
> + struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> +
> + if (dphy->ops->power_off)
> + return dphy->ops->power_off(dphy);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int cdns_dphy_configure(struct phy *phy, union phy_configure_opts *opts)
> +{
> + struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> +
> + if (dphy->ops->configure)
> + return dphy->ops->configure(dphy, opts);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
Given that all of these are essentially pass-through operations, how
about getting rid of the indirection ? I would create a new structure:
struct cdns_dphy_info {
const struct phy_ops *phy_ops;
const struct cdns_dphy_ops *dphy_ops;
};
and reference it in cdns_dphy_of_match. The cdns_dphy structure would
then store a pointer to cdns_dphy_info. That way you won't have to
extend cdns_dphy_ops, which could possibly be renamed to
cdns_dphy_tx_ops as you don't use those operations for rx.
> static const struct phy_ops cdns_dphy_ops = {
> .configure = cdns_dphy_configure,
> .validate = cdns_dphy_validate,
> @@ -320,6 +370,7 @@ static int cdns_dphy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!dphy)
> return -ENOMEM;
> dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, dphy);
> + dphy->dev = &pdev->dev;
>
> dphy->ops = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> if (!dphy->ops)
> @@ -329,11 +380,11 @@ static int cdns_dphy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(dphy->regs))
> return PTR_ERR(dphy->regs);
>
> - dphy->psm_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "psm");
> + dphy->psm_clk = devm_clk_get_optional(dphy->dev, "psm");
> if (IS_ERR(dphy->psm_clk))
> return PTR_ERR(dphy->psm_clk);
>
> - dphy->pll_ref_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "pll_ref");
> + dphy->pll_ref_clk = devm_clk_get_optional(dphy->dev, "pll_ref");
> if (IS_ERR(dphy->pll_ref_clk))
> return PTR_ERR(dphy->pll_ref_clk);
>
> @@ -369,7 +420,7 @@ static int cdns_dphy_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> static const struct of_device_id cdns_dphy_of_match[] = {
> - { .compatible = "cdns,dphy", .data = &ref_dphy_ops },
> + { .compatible = "cdns,dphy", .data = &tx_ref_dphy_ops },
> { /* sentinel */ },
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cdns_dphy_of_match);
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-23 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-20 19:03 [PATCH v4 0/6] Rx mode support for Cadence DPHY Pratyush Yadav
2021-08-20 19:03 ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-08-20 19:03 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] phy: cdns-dphy: Prepare for Rx support Pratyush Yadav
2021-08-20 19:03 ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-08-23 1:25 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2021-08-23 1:25 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-08-26 19:14 ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-08-26 19:14 ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-08-20 19:03 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] phy: cdns-dphy: Add " Pratyush Yadav
2021-08-20 19:03 ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-08-23 1:37 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-08-23 1:37 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-08-26 18:49 ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-08-26 18:49 ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-08-26 19:34 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-08-26 19:34 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-08-20 19:03 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] phy: dt-bindings: Convert Cadence DPHY binding to YAML Pratyush Yadav
2021-08-20 19:03 ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-08-20 19:03 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] phy: dt-bindings: cdns,dphy: make clocks optional Pratyush Yadav
2021-08-20 19:03 ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-08-23 1:40 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-08-23 1:40 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-08-23 8:57 ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-08-23 8:57 ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-08-20 19:03 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] phy: dt-bindings: cdns, dphy: add power-domains property Pratyush Yadav
2021-08-20 19:03 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] phy: dt-bindings: cdns,dphy: " Pratyush Yadav
2021-08-20 19:03 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] phy: dt-bindings: cdns,dphy: add Rx DPHY compatible Pratyush Yadav
2021-08-20 19:03 ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-08-23 1:44 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-08-23 1:44 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-08-23 22:43 ` Rob Herring
2021-08-23 22:43 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YSL48RA2ksldoCyX@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nikhil.nd@ti.com \
--cc=p.yadav@ti.com \
--cc=paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com \
--cc=peter.chen@nxp.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.