All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Carlos Bilbao <bilbao@vt.edu>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] include: linux: Reorganize timekeeping and ktime headers
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 07:21:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YYN78YlFrV0vFPq9@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fb66b935-b498-723a-1f05-f02648f8f580@vt.edu>

On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 03:33:52PM -0400, Carlos Bilbao wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> Some time ago I sent a small patch to avoid implicit function declaration. 
> In particular, timekeeping.h was using ktime_to_ns(), a static function defined 
> in a header it does no include, ktime.h. Some maintainers saw this as an 
> opportunity to reorganize ktime, and so I did and tested for all architectures.
> Now, this patch has fallen into the "limbo of patches", so the original problem
> remains unsolved. Please, either take a look at this or check the original
> patch for the header dependencies.

Please just resend after 5.16-rc1 is out, there's nothing we can do with
this at this point in time.

thanks,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Carlos Bilbao <bilbao@vt.edu>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] include: linux: Reorganize timekeeping and ktime headers
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 07:21:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YYN78YlFrV0vFPq9@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fb66b935-b498-723a-1f05-f02648f8f580@vt.edu>

On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 03:33:52PM -0400, Carlos Bilbao wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> Some time ago I sent a small patch to avoid implicit function declaration. 
> In particular, timekeeping.h was using ktime_to_ns(), a static function defined 
> in a header it does no include, ktime.h. Some maintainers saw this as an 
> opportunity to reorganize ktime, and so I did and tested for all architectures.
> Now, this patch has fallen into the "limbo of patches", so the original problem
> remains unsolved. Please, either take a look at this or check the original
> patch for the header dependencies.

Please just resend after 5.16-rc1 is out, there's nothing we can do with
this at this point in time.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-04  6:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-31 19:30 arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c:801:5: error: no previous prototype for 'update_persistent_clock64' kernel test robot
2021-07-31 19:30 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-01 20:12 ` [PATCH v4.1] include: linux: Reorganize timekeeping and ktime headers Carlos Bilbao
2021-08-01 20:12   ` Carlos Bilbao
2021-08-01 20:12   ` Carlos Bilbao
2021-08-09 15:07   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-08-09 15:07     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-08-09 15:07     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-08-09 16:39     ` Carlos Bilbao
2021-08-09 16:39       ` Carlos Bilbao
2021-08-09 16:39       ` Carlos Bilbao
2021-08-22 13:15       ` Carlos Bilbao
2021-08-22 13:15         ` Carlos Bilbao
2021-08-22 13:23         ` Greg KH
2021-08-22 13:23           ` Greg KH
2021-08-22 13:27           ` [PATCH v5] " Carlos Bilbao
2021-08-22 13:27             ` Carlos Bilbao
2021-09-12 15:33             ` Carlos Bilbao
2021-09-12 15:33               ` Carlos Bilbao
2021-11-03 19:33               ` Carlos Bilbao
2021-11-03 19:33                 ` Carlos Bilbao
2021-11-04  6:21                 ` Greg KH [this message]
2021-11-04  6:21                   ` Greg KH
2021-11-16 22:11                   ` Carlos Bilbao
2021-11-16 22:11                     ` Carlos Bilbao
2021-11-16 22:11                     ` Carlos Bilbao
2021-11-16 22:11                       ` Carlos Bilbao
2021-12-01 15:22                       ` Carlos Bilbao
2021-12-01 15:22                         ` Carlos Bilbao
2021-12-03 13:28                         ` Greg KH
2021-12-03 13:28                           ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YYN78YlFrV0vFPq9@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bilbao@vt.edu \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.