Re: [PATCH 4/7] media: hantro: move postproc enablement for old cores

[Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>]

Hi Jernej,

On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 07:46:59PM +0100, Jernej Skrabec wrote:
> Older G2 cores, like that in Allwinner H6, seem to have issue with
> latching postproc register values if this is first thing done in job.
> Moving that to the end solves the issue.
> 

Any idea what exact register should be written before the post-processor
is enabled, for H6 to work? Also, which of the PP registers need
to be written "at the end"?

> Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c | 9 ++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c
> index 8c3de31f51b3..530994ab3024 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c
> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ void hantro_start_prepare_run(struct hantro_ctx *ctx)
>  	v4l2_ctrl_request_setup(src_buf->vb2_buf.req_obj.req,
>  				&ctx->ctrl_handler);
>  
> -	if (!ctx->is_encoder) {
> +	if (!ctx->is_encoder && !ctx->dev->variant->legacy_regs) {

To make this less fragile, do you think it would make sense to
have a dedicated quirk flag, something like "legacy_post_proc",
instead of overloading the meaning of legacy_regs.

What do you think?

Thanks,
Ezequiel

>  		if (hantro_needs_postproc(ctx, ctx->vpu_dst_fmt))
>  			hantro_postproc_enable(ctx);
>  		else
> @@ -142,6 +142,13 @@ void hantro_end_prepare_run(struct hantro_ctx *ctx)
>  {
>  	struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *src_buf;
>  
> +	if (ctx->dev->variant->legacy_regs && !ctx->is_encoder) {
> +		if (hantro_needs_postproc(ctx, ctx->vpu_dst_fmt))
> +			hantro_postproc_enable(ctx);
> +		else
> +			hantro_postproc_disable(ctx);
> +	}
> +
>  	src_buf = hantro_get_src_buf(ctx);
>  	v4l2_ctrl_request_complete(src_buf->vb2_buf.req_obj.req,
>  				   &ctx->ctrl_handler);
> -- 
> 2.34.0
>