All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@google.com>
To: "allen-kh.cheng" <allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
	cujomalainey@google.com, Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] firmware: mediatek: add adsp ipc protocol interface
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 12:43:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YaBl2PMPHnOMGKY+@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211125122925.1303-3-allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com>

On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 08:29:24PM +0800, allen-kh.cheng wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/mediatek/mtk-adsp-ipc.c b/drivers/firmware/mediatek/mtk-adsp-ipc.c
[...]
> +static void adsp_ipc_recv(struct mbox_client *c, void *msg)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_adsp_chan *chan = container_of(c, struct mtk_adsp_chan, cl);
> +
> +	if (chan->idx == MTK_ADSP_MBOX_REPLY)
> +		chan->ipc->ops->handle_reply(chan->ipc);
> +	else
> +		chan->ipc->ops->handle_request(chan->ipc);

Using switch ... case ... makes the intention more clear.

> +static int mtk_adsp_ipc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
[...]
> +	for (i = 0; i < MTK_ADSP_MBOX_NUM; i++) {
> +		chan_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "mbox%d", i);
> +		if (!chan_name)
> +			return -ENOMEM;

It needs to go error handling path.

> +static int mtk_adsp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_adsp_chan *dsp_chan;
> +	struct mtk_adsp_ipc *dsp_ipc;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	dsp_ipc = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);

To be concise, I would prefer dev_get_drvdata() inline to the line where the variable is declared.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@google.com>
To: "allen-kh.cheng" <allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com>
Cc: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	cujomalainey@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
	Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] firmware: mediatek: add adsp ipc protocol interface
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 12:43:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YaBl2PMPHnOMGKY+@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211125122925.1303-3-allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com>

On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 08:29:24PM +0800, allen-kh.cheng wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/mediatek/mtk-adsp-ipc.c b/drivers/firmware/mediatek/mtk-adsp-ipc.c
[...]
> +static void adsp_ipc_recv(struct mbox_client *c, void *msg)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_adsp_chan *chan = container_of(c, struct mtk_adsp_chan, cl);
> +
> +	if (chan->idx == MTK_ADSP_MBOX_REPLY)
> +		chan->ipc->ops->handle_reply(chan->ipc);
> +	else
> +		chan->ipc->ops->handle_request(chan->ipc);

Using switch ... case ... makes the intention more clear.

> +static int mtk_adsp_ipc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
[...]
> +	for (i = 0; i < MTK_ADSP_MBOX_NUM; i++) {
> +		chan_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "mbox%d", i);
> +		if (!chan_name)
> +			return -ENOMEM;

It needs to go error handling path.

> +static int mtk_adsp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_adsp_chan *dsp_chan;
> +	struct mtk_adsp_ipc *dsp_ipc;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	dsp_ipc = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);

To be concise, I would prefer dev_get_drvdata() inline to the line where the variable is declared.

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@google.com>
To: "allen-kh.cheng" <allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com>
Cc: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	cujomalainey@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
	Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] firmware: mediatek: add adsp ipc protocol interface
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 12:43:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YaBl2PMPHnOMGKY+@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211125122925.1303-3-allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com>

On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 08:29:24PM +0800, allen-kh.cheng wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/mediatek/mtk-adsp-ipc.c b/drivers/firmware/mediatek/mtk-adsp-ipc.c
[...]
> +static void adsp_ipc_recv(struct mbox_client *c, void *msg)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_adsp_chan *chan = container_of(c, struct mtk_adsp_chan, cl);
> +
> +	if (chan->idx == MTK_ADSP_MBOX_REPLY)
> +		chan->ipc->ops->handle_reply(chan->ipc);
> +	else
> +		chan->ipc->ops->handle_request(chan->ipc);

Using switch ... case ... makes the intention more clear.

> +static int mtk_adsp_ipc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
[...]
> +	for (i = 0; i < MTK_ADSP_MBOX_NUM; i++) {
> +		chan_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "mbox%d", i);
> +		if (!chan_name)
> +			return -ENOMEM;

It needs to go error handling path.

> +static int mtk_adsp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_adsp_chan *dsp_chan;
> +	struct mtk_adsp_ipc *dsp_ipc;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	dsp_ipc = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);

To be concise, I would prefer dev_get_drvdata() inline to the line where the variable is declared.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@google.com>
To: "allen-kh.cheng" <allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com>
Cc: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	cujomalainey@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
	Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] firmware: mediatek: add adsp ipc protocol interface
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 12:43:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YaBl2PMPHnOMGKY+@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211125122925.1303-3-allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com>

On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 08:29:24PM +0800, allen-kh.cheng wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/mediatek/mtk-adsp-ipc.c b/drivers/firmware/mediatek/mtk-adsp-ipc.c
[...]
> +static void adsp_ipc_recv(struct mbox_client *c, void *msg)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_adsp_chan *chan = container_of(c, struct mtk_adsp_chan, cl);
> +
> +	if (chan->idx == MTK_ADSP_MBOX_REPLY)
> +		chan->ipc->ops->handle_reply(chan->ipc);
> +	else
> +		chan->ipc->ops->handle_request(chan->ipc);

Using switch ... case ... makes the intention more clear.

> +static int mtk_adsp_ipc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
[...]
> +	for (i = 0; i < MTK_ADSP_MBOX_NUM; i++) {
> +		chan_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "mbox%d", i);
> +		if (!chan_name)
> +			return -ENOMEM;

It needs to go error handling path.

> +static int mtk_adsp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_adsp_chan *dsp_chan;
> +	struct mtk_adsp_ipc *dsp_ipc;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	dsp_ipc = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);

To be concise, I would prefer dev_get_drvdata() inline to the line where the variable is declared.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-26  4:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-25 12:29 [PATCH v4 0/3] This patches provide ADSP IPC support for MT8195 allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-25 12:29 ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-25 12:29 ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-25 12:29 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: mediatek: add adsp-mbox document allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-25 12:29   ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-25 12:29   ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-25 12:29 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] firmware: mediatek: add adsp ipc protocol interface allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-25 12:29   ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-25 12:29   ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-26  4:43   ` Tzung-Bi Shih [this message]
2021-11-26  4:43     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2021-11-26  4:43     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2021-11-26  4:43     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2021-11-25 12:29 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] mailbox: mediatek: add support for adsp mailbox controller allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-25 12:29   ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-25 12:29   ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-26  4:43   ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2021-11-26  4:43     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2021-11-26  4:43     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2021-11-26  4:43     ` Tzung-Bi Shih

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YaBl2PMPHnOMGKY+@google.com \
    --to=tzungbi@google.com \
    --cc=Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com \
    --cc=allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=cujomalainey@google.com \
    --cc=daniel.baluta@nxp.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
    --cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.