From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Michał Winiarski" <michal.winiarski@intel.com>,
"Intel GFX" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
"DRI Devel" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 01/11] drm/i915: Store backpointer to GT in uncore
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 19:26:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbI8KBKFMSjWhEKl@intel.intel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ilvx3dz9.fsf@intel.com>
Hi Jani,
thanks for looking at it.
> > - intel_gt_init_early(&dev_priv->gt, dev_priv);
> > + __intel_gt_init_early(&dev_priv->gt, dev_priv);
>
> Why double underscores here? It looks like it's supposed to be internal
> to intel_gt, not to be called by anyone else.
I forgot to write two lines in the commit log about this.
It's a temporary solution that will go away in the next patch
series[*].
The reason for it is because at this point I need to break the
early initialization of the gt into two parts. In the specific
the '__intel_gt_init_early' assigns the i915 private data and the
uncore.
It's not pretty, but, knowing what's coming next, it's the change
with the smallest impact.
> >
> > i915_gem_init_early(dev_priv);
> >
Thank you,
Andi
[*] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/464475/?series=97352&rev=1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Michał Winiarski" <michal.winiarski@intel.com>,
"Intel GFX" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
"DRI Devel" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
"Andi Shyti" <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 01/11] drm/i915: Store backpointer to GT in uncore
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 19:26:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbI8KBKFMSjWhEKl@intel.intel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ilvx3dz9.fsf@intel.com>
Hi Jani,
thanks for looking at it.
> > - intel_gt_init_early(&dev_priv->gt, dev_priv);
> > + __intel_gt_init_early(&dev_priv->gt, dev_priv);
>
> Why double underscores here? It looks like it's supposed to be internal
> to intel_gt, not to be called by anyone else.
I forgot to write two lines in the commit log about this.
It's a temporary solution that will go away in the next patch
series[*].
The reason for it is because at this point I need to break the
early initialization of the gt into two parts. In the specific
the '__intel_gt_init_early' assigns the i915 private data and the
uncore.
It's not pretty, but, knowing what's coming next, it's the change
with the smallest impact.
> >
> > i915_gem_init_early(dev_priv);
> >
Thank you,
Andi
[*] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/464475/?series=97352&rev=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-09 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-09 13:25 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 00/11] More preparation for multi gt patches Andi Shyti
2021-12-09 13:25 ` Andi Shyti
2021-12-09 13:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 01/11] drm/i915: Store backpointer to GT in uncore Andi Shyti
2021-12-09 13:25 ` Andi Shyti
2021-12-09 17:06 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2021-12-09 17:26 ` Andi Shyti [this message]
2021-12-09 17:26 ` Andi Shyti
2021-12-09 13:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 02/11] drm/i915: Introduce to_gt() helper Andi Shyti
2021-12-09 13:25 ` Andi Shyti
2021-12-09 23:00 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2021-12-09 23:00 ` Matt Roper
2021-12-09 13:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 03/11] drm/i915/display: Use " Andi Shyti
2021-12-09 13:25 ` Andi Shyti
2021-12-09 23:03 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2021-12-09 23:03 ` Matt Roper
2021-12-09 13:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 04/11] drm/i915/gt: " Andi Shyti
2021-12-09 13:25 ` Andi Shyti
2021-12-09 23:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2021-12-09 23:33 ` Matt Roper
2021-12-09 13:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 05/11] drm/i915/gem: " Andi Shyti
2021-12-09 13:25 ` Andi Shyti
2021-12-09 23:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2021-12-09 23:50 ` Matt Roper
2021-12-09 13:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 06/11] drm/i915/gvt: " Andi Shyti
2021-12-09 13:25 ` Andi Shyti
2021-12-09 23:51 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2021-12-09 23:51 ` Matt Roper
2021-12-09 13:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 07/11] drm/i915/selftests: " Andi Shyti
2021-12-09 13:25 ` Andi Shyti
2021-12-09 23:55 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2021-12-09 23:55 ` Matt Roper
2021-12-09 13:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 08/11] drm/i915/pxp: " Andi Shyti
2021-12-09 13:25 ` Andi Shyti
2021-12-09 23:59 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2021-12-09 23:59 ` Matt Roper
2021-12-10 0:21 ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2021-12-10 0:21 ` Andi Shyti
2021-12-10 0:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2021-12-10 0:22 ` Matt Roper
2021-12-10 1:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 " Andi Shyti
2021-12-10 1:07 ` Andi Shyti
2021-12-10 15:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2021-12-10 15:27 ` Matt Roper
2021-12-09 13:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 09/11] drm/i915: " Andi Shyti
2021-12-09 13:25 ` Andi Shyti
2021-12-10 0:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2021-12-10 0:02 ` Matt Roper
2021-12-09 13:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 10/11] drm/i915: Use to_gt() helper for GGTT accesses Andi Shyti
2021-12-09 13:25 ` Andi Shyti
2021-12-10 0:18 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2021-12-10 0:18 ` Matt Roper
2021-12-10 2:11 ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2021-12-10 2:11 ` Andi Shyti
2021-12-09 13:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 11/11] drm/i915: Rename i915->gt to i915->gt0 Andi Shyti
2021-12-09 13:25 ` Andi Shyti
2021-12-10 0:19 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2021-12-10 0:19 ` Matt Roper
2021-12-10 10:25 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for More preparation for multi gt patches (rev7) Patchwork
2021-12-10 10:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-12-10 10:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-12-11 3:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YbI8KBKFMSjWhEKl@intel.intel \
--to=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.