From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Cc: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] ata: libahci_platform: Get rid of dup message when IRQ can't be retrieved
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:02:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbfDCNIMNy4PdBwL@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0d967bb4-0b80-c293-b7d5-f49c9cc38718@opensource.wdc.com>
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 06:36:00AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 2021/12/13 20:52, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 07:39:31AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> >> On 2021/12/11 19:25, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:
...
> >> The problem I see is that the current behavior is unclear: what does
> >> platform_get_irq_optional() returning 0 mean ? IRQ == 0 ? or "no IRQ" ? I think
> >> it should be the latter rather than the former. Note that the function could
> >> return ENOENT (or similar) for the "no IRQ" case. With that, case (2) goes away,
> >> but then I do not see any difference between platform_get_irq_optional() and
> >> platform_get_irq().
> >>
> >> If the preferred API semantic is to allow returning IRQ 0 with a warning, then
> >> the kdoc comments of platform_get_irq_optional() and platform_get_irq() are
> >> totally broken, and the code for many drivers is probably wrong too.
> >
> > Yeah, what we need to do is that (roughly a roadmap):
> > - revisit callers of platform_get_irq_optional() to be prepared for
> > new behaviour
> > - rewrite platform_get_irq() to return -ENOENT
> > - rewrite platform_get_irq_optional() to return 0 on -ENOENT
> >
> > This is how other similar (i.e. _optional) APIs do.
>
> Sounds like a good plan to me. In the mean time though, your patch 1/2 should
> keep the "if (!irq)" test and return an error for that case. No ?
No problem. I can send a v2.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-13 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-09 14:59 [PATCH v1 1/2] ata: libahci_platform: Get rid of dup message when IRQ can't be retrieved Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-09 14:59 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] ata: libahci_platform: Remove bogus 32-bit DMA mask attempt Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-10 19:34 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-11 0:04 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-12-17 0:58 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-12-17 11:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-09 15:21 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] ata: libahci_platform: Get rid of dup message when IRQ can't be retrieved Hans de Goede
2021-12-09 17:24 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-12-09 17:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-09 18:22 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-12-09 19:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-09 19:27 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-09 20:31 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-12-09 20:29 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-12-10 10:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-10 11:14 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-12-10 11:28 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-10 17:39 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-12-10 17:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-09 22:49 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-12-09 22:57 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-12-10 8:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-10 16:38 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-12-10 17:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-10 8:59 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-12-10 10:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-10 11:19 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-12-10 11:36 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-10 17:15 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2021-12-10 17:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-10 19:01 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-12-10 19:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-10 19:30 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-12-10 19:35 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2021-12-11 10:13 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-12-13 11:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-10 23:45 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-12-11 10:25 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-12-12 22:39 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-12-13 11:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-13 21:36 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-12-13 22:02 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2021-12-13 11:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-13 11:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YbfDCNIMNy4PdBwL@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.shtylyov@omp.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.